User talk:Cuber2020

November 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Feliks Zemdegs has been reverted. Your edit here to Feliks Zemdegs was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://speedsolving.fandom.com/wiki/Feliks_Zemdegs) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Feliks Zemdegs have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Feliks Zemdegs was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://speedsolving.fandom.com/wiki/Feliks_Zemdegs) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit to Speedcubing
Hello there! I'm letting you know that I reverted one of your recent edits to the Speedcubing page due to having a lack of citations to back up your changes. Additionally, while the Petrus method is commonly used anymore, it has still had a major impact in the history of the Speedcubing community, which justifies its place on the page. If you have a credible source that justifies your edit, please feel free to undo my reversion and add them. Thanks! AVeryBadTypist (talk) 23:49, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of all cryptocurrencies


The article List of all cryptocurrencies has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Duplicate of List of cryptocurrencies but without regard to notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 10:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

"List of all cryptocurrencies" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of all cryptocurrencies. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Smjg (talk) 14:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Kusma. I noticed that you recently removed content from Polar bear without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Kusma (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2022 Badminton Asia Team Championships
Hello Cuber2020,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2022 Badminton Asia Team Championships for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 08:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dewald Brevis.webp


A tag has been placed on File:Dewald Brevis.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.espncricinfo.com/player/dewald-brevis-1070665. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Incomplete updates to ICC player rankings pages
Hi, I see you have updated most of the ICC rankings templates, could you check the whole table when you do so, as you missed a few players today. Also when you moved some players up and down you didn't move the corresponding flags. Spike &#39;em (talk) 09:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't understand why Bairstow has lost points in the ODI rankings, so easy to miss that one. Spike &#39;em (talk) 09:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Girls' Brigade Singapore
Hello Cuber2020, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Girls' Brigade Singapore, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Girls' Brigade Singapore.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ Tails   Wx  (🐾, me!) 02:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)