User talk:CuddleKing1993

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diablophis (April 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diablophis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Diablophis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Diablophis Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mcmatter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Diablophis reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Suchomimus. --Mr Fink (talk) 03:39, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your recent conduct is going to get you blocked if it continues. Stop, or expect to lose your editing privileges.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:57, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Acrocanthosaurus. Please stop giving such inanely hysterical edit summaries, and try to provide sources support your changes instead of accusations of lying and false hope.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diablophis (June 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diablophis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Diablophis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Diablophis Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Diablophis reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Atlantis536 (talk) 00:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Atlantis536 (talk) 11:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

This is the third time I've reported you to ANI, CuddleKing. You'd better stop your problematic behaviors or else you might be blocked. Atlantis536 (talk) 01:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please read WP:NOTAFORUM and follow it. Wikipedia is not the place to ask for advice about your fan fiction. Cullen328 (talk) 18:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a social network
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Wasell. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Labocania, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —  Wasell ( T ) 🌻🇺🇦 12:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Irgilin Dzo moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Irgilin Dzo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 14:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Diablophis
Hello, CuddleKing1993. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Diablophis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Speculation
You need to stop posting personal speculation on the talkpages of the articles without any sources, it is just creating useless clutter. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Why would Alamosaurus have come from South America instead of Asia? CuddleKing1993 (talk) 23:33, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

The relationships of American Late Cretaceous fauna, according to current science
Since you insist on your own idea of these creatures' relationships, I would like to remind you how they really are related according to real, professional scientists.

- Labocania is disputed to be either a tyrannosauroid or a carcharodontosaurid similar to Shaochilong.

- Dakotaraptor is currently believed to be a dromaeosaurine, but a chimaeric one.

- Santanaraptor is usually believed to be tyrannosauroid, although it seems to have some features of noasaurids.

- Kelumapusaura is part of an endemic clade of South American kritosaurins.

- Notoceratops may be either a ceratopsian or a hadrosaurid.

- Patagopelta is a nodosaurid, possibly a panoplosaurin.

- Alamosaurus is a saltasauroid titanosaur, although it is disputed whether its ancestors came from South America or Asia.

There is currently NO evidence that Labocania is an abelisaurid or that Notoceratops is a ceratopsid. The evidence for Dakotaraptor being a unenlagiine is flimsy at best. The describers of Patagopelta tested its relationships against parankylosaurs and nodosaurids and found it to clade with the latter.

The presence of nodosaurids and hadrosaurids in South America and Alamosaurus in North America does not automatically assume that their contemporaries also crossed continents. The exact reason why is unknown, but it definitely isn't because of their "majesty" or "mundaneness" and most definitely not because you yourself personally want to see evidence of a Late Cretaceous American interchange. You do not have the power to guide the evolution of dinosaurs that lived seventy million years before you were even born. So STOP adding your speculations to articles and talk pages, because real scientists don't agree, and Wikipedia can only show real scientists' findings when it comes to the relationships of dinosaurs. 2001:4453:5C6:CB00:C56C:38D2:DFBF:253A (talk) 09:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I do not understand the logic of professional scientists. CuddleKing1993 (talk) 11:28, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The scientists examine the fossils themselves, notice certain subtle traits in those bones, then use their knowledge of fossils to compare them and determine their relationships. Sometimes they enter those traits into a phylogenetic analysis so that computers can work out their relationships.
 * On the other hand, I assume you just read the very simplified results of those scientists on Wikipedia and form your own theories based on them. While that's still scientific thinking, your theories can't be added to Wikipedia because they aren't published in scientific papers and aren't based on provable evidence.
 * Besides the fact that "hadrosaurs and nodosaurs reached SA from NA, so ceratopsids must've too" and "you want to see ceratopsids and abelisaurids fighting", what concrete evidence do you have for Notoceratops to be a ceratopsid? Are there subtle features in its fragmentary, lost dentary that suggest relationships with ceratopsids? If so, I suggest you write a scientific paper about it and publish it in a scientific journal before you add it to Wikipedia. 2001:4453:5C6:CB00:C0FF:93AA:66B0:4E32 (talk) 12:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

2001:4453:5C6:CB00:C56C:38D2:DFBF:253A (talk) 09:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * In case there is ever an unblock request, I can't help but respond to this statement: "I do not understand the logic of professional scientists" with "You don't need to understand it. Just accept it." David10244 (talk) 13:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sarrail (talk) 01:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Diablophis


Hello, CuddleKing1993. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Diablophis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Irgilin Dzo
Hello, CuddleKing1993. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Irgilin Dzo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Irgilin Dzo


Hello, CuddleKing1993. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Irgilin Dzo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)