User talk:Culolala

Welcome!
I have noticed that an individual, who will remain unnamed, but has been a Wikipedia member since 2006 rejected my factual edits on Gibraltar. Sadly, for many British people, Gibraltar is the ONLY colony remaining in Europe! This truth apparently ruffled an editors feathers but the comment is both truthful and objective yet he removed it. Makes no sense to me but i dare say that this pro-British bologna that so-called Western Society magically accepts as factual is ridiculous! Essentially, this British doctrine to "truth" as they see it, masks and subverts the real truth from coming out. I am somewhat offended that he feels the truth regarding Gibraltar, as i stated above, is my personal opinion? It is not my good Sir. Obviously, you have some power here in Wikipedia to subvert the truth from coming out so i am powerless. Nevertheless, i feel you and the others like yourself on Wikipedia are doing a disservice rather than a service. I sincerely hope that you do not take offence and understand that my comment is both truthful and objective. I repeat," Gibraltar is the only colony left in Europe, and the British refuse to leave". So everything else according to your British history as you see it on that page is perfect i assume? But my comment is not? Ridiculous!

October 2014
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Gibraltar and Canadians of Spanish descent. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Warning for unsourced personal commentary. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a blog, so all material added must be surced to reliable sources, and personal POV comments are not allowed.'' Thomas.W talk 06:53, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

=
====================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Sir Thomas. W thank you for taking the time and teaching a lowly pheasant like myself how to write the facts and history as the British see fit! As a Spaniard, i should be ashamed of myself for having dared utter, "Gibraltar is the only colony left in Europe and the British refuse to leave". I aught to have known better than to question an Englishman's authority on Gibraltar and i will never do anything to harm Britain in any way, shape or form again! I further submit myself to whatever whipping and torture you prescribe. For it is thy will that i serve, and not mine own Sir. Please forgive. Again, i am so very sorry for daring to utter what i did, 1000 apologies good Sir. With a very low head i plead for your forgiveness Sir.
 * Don't be silly. The only one your posts here reflect bad on is you. Your edits were reverted because A) they violated Wikipedia's rules about neutral point-of-view, and B) they were factually incorrect. Gibraltar is not a colony but a self-governing territory with its own elected parliament and its own laws. And it's because of their own will that they're a British Overseas Territory. Two referendums, in 1967 and 2002, have also clearly shown that the people of Gibraltar do not want to be Spanish, with 98.48% of the voters saying no to Spain in the referendum of 2002, and even more than that in 1967. Thomas.W talk 21:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

=
===========================================================================================

Me silly? Take a step back and let me walk you through your very "typical" British version of history & truth(s) as you folks see things of course...do you not think that as a Ph.D. scholar (U.S.C. at Sacramento) i am not fully aware that there are paid-promoters of causes throughout cyber space? In this case, you are one of the many sentinels that promote the British version of what Gibraltar is.

You are either warned and or constantly monitor Gibraltar page(s) to make sure the British tone is not interrupted in any way, shape, or form. I come along with a fact and you hound me like a Nazi SS (British were no different nor your American cousins in executing and murdering the masses; only thing you Anglos do very, very well is blame the Spanish or make up the Black Legend, and rewrite the history books with the pro-British minutia the rest of the planet is supposed to swallow as fact) soldier as we can clearly see with your bombardment of messages telling me i am wrong, wrong, wrong and so forth. And, then hide behind rules and regulations (made up by the British of course) to further censor the truth. A very lame, and quite old story that this scholar, and many others i may add, are tired of hearing over the past century when you ramped-up the propaganda machine. I can be here all day and provide a treatise of your British bologna but i have better things to do with my life.

So you go ahead and toil away like the "tool" you are protecting the only colony left in Europe and the Queen ( whom i assure you cares not a single iota about you nor of her "forced" so-called loyal British subjects). Tonight, before you go to bed, get a nice tea and some biscuits and really think hard about what you are doing and if it really makes any logical sense? Also, reflect on the many Spaniards, and non-Spaniards alike, out there that are sick and tired of the pro-British dribble the planet is lambasted with on a daily basis.

If you have developed critical skills you will come to a very startling revelation and you may very well think twice about amending your way(s) of being. No doubt, as the good British lad you stubbornly believe you are, you will find some way to take offence with the kind, loving and gentle words i just gave you. And, yet again, i will be proven right on how the British insidiously operate throughout their history, and today of course!

Adios muchachito, A.P. Ph.D. U.S.C. at Sacramento, USA.

Accurate Edit of Canada was Reversed...By the pro-British Censor Police, WHY??
On November 2, 2014 i made the following accurate edit of Canada," Spain had land claims to all of Canada since Christopher Columbus claimed the New World for Spain on October 12, 1492."[33] I cited the Treaty of Tordesillas dated 7 June,1494. Now, i do understand that the British have many, many sentinels that are CONSTANTLY monitoring Wikipedia and other media sources on the internet on a Global Scale to maintain the erroneous British version of history. I supposed, and at the same time i protest, the fact that such a pro-British sentinel has REVERSED my edit, even though, my edit was 1 sentence, precise and cited correctly! Why is it that the British enjoy suppressing truths in history as it relates to Spain? Spain discovered Canada, was established in Canada for centuries yet the British history police ONLY forcefully mention either themselves or the French in Canada. Why that insistence? Please feel free to come on here Mr. pro-British tone editor and enlighten me on your bizarre British ways you lambaste the rest of the planet with.

November 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Olivenza. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Per WP:BRD you should have discussed this on the talk page after I undid your edit the first time. The comment that it will remain Spanish is POV, the source is not a WP:RS, and the comment the Portuguese have better things to worry about is not encyclopedic. Discuss it on the article's talk page if you insist, but stop making this edit. Meters (talk) 03:28, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

=
==================================================== You say," the comment that it will remain Spanish is not a POV"...No offence, but i too have editing rights and it is best we both do not enter an editing war. Therefore, i highly suggest you (not me as a good token) revert the article back in the manner that i objectively wrote it," Neverthelsee, Olivenza has been Spanish for over 214 years and will remain as such. Perhaps, the Portuguese nation would be better to focus its energies on the current crippling economic crisis rather than focus its energies on the past and what once was; a difficult psychological task indeed." I can later add new sources to support. No offence, but AGAIN, it seems like the cyber space (including Wikipedia) is a home for the bizarre British version of history as they see it (and no doubt, you are one of the many sentinels it has at its disposal). Lets be fair, as i am sure you do not wish me to hand out warnings and reverts to your pro-British dribble, right? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Culolala (talk • contribs) 03:36, November 6, 2014‎
 * TI started a discussion on the article's talk page. Take it there. I'm certainly not restoring your edit. You made an edit, and I undid with what I believe are valid grounds. Per WP:BRD it's up to you now to discuss it on the talk page and attempt to get consensus to add it. You should have done so after the first edit.
 * If you want to contact me directly, next time try posting on my talk page, not on my retired (and never used) alternate account.
 * Also, please remove the above comment accusing me. I've said nothing at al about British interests, and your comment is verging on a personal attack.