User talk:CultureCouture

Congrats... You asked an awesome question in the Teahouse!

 * Thank you. CultureCouture (talk) 23:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Ball culture categories
Hi CC, we don't categorize into groups that only contain one article. The cats for Houses who have multiple notable members are fine, but the others are best placed in Category:Ball culture (the parent category) than to be left alone in their own category. The aforementioned category isn't that big either, so there isn't much of a need to subdivide. czar 16:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay czar. Thank you.CultureCouture (talk) 23:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Papa Joe Aviance


The article Papa Joe Aviance has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable individual lacking notability beyond WP:1EVENT. Subject is known for losing weight."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 00:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Papa Joe Aviance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Papa Joe Aviance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Papa Joe Aviance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Papa Joe Aviance should have been closed
Hi CC, I don't know whether you are aware but this discussion should have been closed yesterday since its last relist. I have pinged the two admins and asked them to close it. This is just to notify you. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 10:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi CC, this is just to notify you that this article has been relisted three times in a raw which is a clear contravention of Wiki policy. In my opinion, this is a clear keep or no consensus. There is no rationale for relisting 3 times in a row. I have stated this to one of the relisters . I understand this process can be very disheartening, but I hope you don't get discouraged and leave the project. We need you here. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your advice. I don't know why it was relisted thrice in a row. To delay closing by 2 days and now this! I'm over it. CultureCouture (talk) 03:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Just to notify you that there is currently a discussion taking place at ANI
Hi CultureCouture, this is just to notify you that there is currently a discussion taking place at ANI which you might want to participate in. The discussion can be found here. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Democratic Congress Alliance (Gambia) politicians


A tag has been placed on Category:Democratic Congress Alliance (Gambia) politicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Gambia Democratic Party politicians


A tag has been placed on Category:The Gambia Democratic Party politicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:House of Milan has been nominated for deletion
Category:House of Milan has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Papa Joe Aviance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Papa Joe Aviance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Papa Joe Aviance& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  scope_creep Talk  19:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kim Aviance


The article Kim Aviance has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Benjamin Milan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benjamin Milan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Benjamin Milan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 12:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ball culture filmmakers has been nominated for deletion
Category:Ball culture filmmakers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)