User talk:Cumbriangirl

Warnings and notifications
First let me extend a hearty "howdy" and welcome to Wikipedia! You're work is very much appreciated and we're glad you're here. If you have any problems or questions, don't hesitate to drop me a line. I noticed your report at AIV; ordinarily we have to warn a user several times about edits before blocking them. For vandalism, see WP:VAND and advertising see WP:ADVERT (there are useful warning templates uw-vand1 through uw-vand4 and uw-spam1 through uw-spam4 which can be used, along with many others). Sometimes a person is blocked before they get four warnings, but usually blocking admins look for about four warnings. I didn't look over all of the edits was making, but be sure they are unquestionably spam. I see you have worked on the article for a while, so I am betting you have seen some that are promotional, etc., although I didn't immediately find anything particularly worrisome in the edits the user was making. It often helps to point these highly problematic edits out when asking for a block.

Conflict of Interest is a challenge to enforce. Sometimes people's writing tends toward the positive, despite a lack of conflicts of interest. It is also not, strictly speaking, prohibited (only *very strongly* discouraged). People with conflicts of interest can be some of the most difficult users to deal with. However it is sort of part of the job (and sometimes those close to a company can point out errors, which can be helpful). My usual approach to editors with a conflict of interest is to (i) point out the WP:COI guideline and WP:NPOV policy, (ii) encourage the potentially conflict-of-interest editor to discuss changes on the talk page, rather than making them directly, and (iii) if things get out of hand on the talk page or the editor refuses to discuss, get wider involvement using WP:COIN (or if the edits are clearly problematic and the user has been warned, WP:AIV).

There's a bit of complexity to the workings around here. I apologize for throwing all this information at you at once. Let me know if there is anything I can help with or clarify. (It can be a bit daunting, even for folks who have been here a while.) Thanks again for all your work on Wikipedia! --TeaDrinker (talk) 00:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Atlantis Group
Howdy and thanks for the note! I went ahead and re-blocked the IP for one month, but saying I would be happy to unblock if they confine their edits to the talk page of the article. I took a look over the article and noticed there was a sentence which might be considered uncited criticism. As such, I removed it to the talk page of the article for discussion. Hopefully a source can be found (and of course, your input there is more than welcome). Thanks for all the work! --TeaDrinker (talk) 03:21, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ARLA logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ARLA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Reading Post logos.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Reading Post logos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Atlantis-group.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Atlantis-group.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Atlantis Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atlantis Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Atlantis Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk |c|em ) 17:45, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Association of Residential Managing Agents for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Association of Residential Managing Agents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Association of Residential Managing Agents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hydromania (talk) 04:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of ARLA Propertymark for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ARLA Propertymark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ARLA Propertymark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hydromania (talk) 17:38, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Sykes (British entrepreneur)


The article John Sykes (British entrepreneur) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and not seeing evidence of satisfying WP:BIO."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk |c|em ) 04:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ARMA logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ARMA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of John Sykes (British entrepreneur) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Sykes (British entrepreneur) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Sykes (British entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk |c|em ) 15:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)