User talk:Cumbrowski

  Wikipedia Resources  A collection of Wikipedia resources for Wikipedia newbies and veterans alike.

User:Cumbrowski/UserTalkArchiveBox User:Cumbrowski/usertalkarchivenav


 * Additional user pages of mine, which you might find useful or interesting


 * About me - More details about me and what I do plus some personal resources.
 * My Wikipedia Resources - Wikipedia resources just for me. My sandbox so to speak.

=Ideas for Improving Wikipedia=


 * Opt-In for Interiot/Editcount Tool'
 * I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms


 * Ideas for Improving Wikipedia (Archive) Archived - Click here
 * What the F**k is REL="NO FOLLOW" ??? - Presented to WikiProject Spam on 4/17/2006. The Whole Text and Comment History can be found here REL=NOFOLLOW attribute for Wikipedia.

= Discussions and Comments = Please sign all your comments by typing --~ at the end of your post. Add a new comment to this page.

The article PubCon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unambiguous advertorial, the sole reason for this page is promotion. Seems somewhat notable, but the article as it is right now is not acceptable for Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeremy112233 (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of PubCon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PubCon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PubCon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jeremy112233 (talk) 20:37, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Ccu wiki heatmap.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  04:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IP targeting


The article IP targeting has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article needs WP:TNT to eliminate edits by Orangemoody sock Dstay29.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 03:59, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Linkshare.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Linkshare.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Geeks.com for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geeks.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Geeks.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Geekslogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Geekslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:UserTalkArchiveListLong
Template:UserTalkArchiveListLong has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Performics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Performics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Performics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:08, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

MediaTrust
I moved your abandoned draft User:Cumbrowski/WorkInProgress/MediaTrust to Draft:MediaTrust where other editors might work on it. – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:MediaTrust


Hello, Cumbrowski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MediaTrust".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:UserTalkArchiveBox
Template:UserTalkArchiveBox has been nominated for merging with Template:Archives. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Terasail [✉️] 12:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Frank Fiore, from its old location at User:Cumbrowski/Frank Fiore. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Compensation methods for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Compensation methods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Compensation methods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zim Zala Bim talk 04:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Frank Fiore
Hello, Cumbrowski. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frank Fiore, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Frank Fiore


Hello, Cumbrowski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frank Fiore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 31 July 2022 (UTC)