User talk:Curiousbadger

''Welcome to my talk page. Please leave a message at the bottom of the page and sign your name with four tildes (~). I will respond on your talk page, if applicable. Curiousbadger 13:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Narnia
Hello, and welcome to WikiProject Narnia. Feel free to help by being bold and checking out our to-do list. If you need anything go ahead and drop a note on my talk page. Bornagain4 16:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Seven Lords Re:
You should probably just drop a note on the WikiProject's discussion page. Bornagain4 13:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Marble Brewery
I can fix the refs if nobody else does. It'll be tomorrow (Sat) though. Regards, Mr Stephen 15:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. If you want to play (use a sandbox), have a look at the ref element, section 4 'how it works'.  Then, if you like, move on to 'template:cite web' here, but that simply formats the reference in a certain manner. Regards, Mr Stephen 17:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * See how you like that. I've made one or two changes to avoid copyvio problems; feel free to improve the English.  You had forgotten to add, so you didn't get the bibliography at the end.  Regards, Mr Stephen 13:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Happy to help. Regards, Mr Stephen 11:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Helpful links
Why thank you lady, for the helpful links. This is hella addictive. Oops. See what you've done!

Drasticsturgeon 14:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Help
Regarding the page Trevor Lock, I have just removed an untrue and potentially damaging statement which was added by an unregistered user - is it possible to vandal proof the page, or does this have to be done by an admin? Is this an appropriate case for vandal blocking?

(I have attached a reference within the page to the only reported news article on the matter, and have been unable to find any other sources).
 * Edit-locking pages is something that we do rarely on Wikipedia, and I'm not sure this page would qualify. The best way to combat vandalism is to add the page to your watchlist to monitor the recent changes to it, and then revert any vandalism you see.  You can use appropriate warning templates on the vandal's talk pages, and if particular users get out of line, you can request administrator intervention.  I hope that's helpful! -- Merope 13:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It is indeed! I've added the page to my watchlist to keep an eye out, and I'll bear the other points in mind. Thanks for the quick response :) Curiousbadger 14:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Whaling.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Whaling.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 11:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for letting me know, have now tagged the image as "book cover". Curiousbadger 22:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Fictional deities
Sorry for the delay, finally responded to your comments at Talk:List_of_fictional_deities Canonblack 11:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Brevity ... is wit.
A good edit at Alan Moore by you, I thought. A great writer but a rambling article. Fred.e 16:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Now I know about Stewart Lee. As indeed I should, if only because he writes about the Fall.  His work sounds too good to ever be on Aus TV. Fred.e 11:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Whaling.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Whaling.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Scientists.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Scientists.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:American virgin 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:American virgin 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Communists.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Communists.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Curiousbadger! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Nick Doody -

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)