User talk:Currentlybiscuit/Archive 5

Project Taiwan
Sorry, it appears I accidentally deleted a section in the Project Taiwan talk page in my haste of posting something. --Bobthefish2 (talk) 04:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

formatting problems
Your edit, here caused a formatting problem on the Talk:Côte d'Ivoire talk page. Your assistance in correcting the formatting is appreciated. Cliff (talk) 03:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate
The Hope Diamond, an article you have edited recently, has been nominated to be a future United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month. All editors interested in improving this article are encouraged to participate. You can vote for this or other articles article of the Month here. --Kumioko (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Auslogics BoostSpeed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Auslogics BoostSpeed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Auslogics BoostSpeed (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

ROC article merge
Greetings, I've replied to your opposition to the merge. Your concern is that the RoC article should not talk about 'historical' things except in historical forms, of which I agree with you. Which is why I had proposed it to be merged into BOTH the Republic of China and History of the Republic of China, where historical information is put into the historical sections and the modern parts put into the current state article. Liu Tao (talk) 14:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Dispute Resolution
You may be interested in this. Peter jackson (talk) 10:50, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Mambo (software)
Is a post a by a Mambo developer an unreliable source? How so? --Zeno McDohl (talk) 16:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of WorldVentures for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WorldVentures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/WorldVentures (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Laurent (talk) 15:00, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Wheeler-dryden.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wheeler-dryden.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Requested move of Côte d'Ivoire
There is currently a discussion on moving the article Côte d'Ivoire to Ivory Coast. You are being notified since you participated in a previous discussion on this topic. Please join the discussion here if you are interested. TDL (talk) 02:22, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Taiwanarmspic1.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Taiwanarmspic1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Artoonix


The article Artoonix has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Apparently non-notable software. No significant coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 12:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Bothunter
I added some potential source material at Talk:Bothunter, which is a talk page of an article you created. Please consider using the references to expand the article. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fri
Template:Fri has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Esi
Template:Esi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dei
Template:Dei has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:36, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Harry's Filters


The article Harry's Filters has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article fails these notability guidelines because there are insufficient reliable sources to form a complete article. These vast majority of information about this website consists of blogs, forums, and chat sites, most of which are "how to" guides for using the filters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Senator2029 leave me a message 19:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

TrueCrypt
Hi,

I removed the license link because it doesn't work anymore. If the website is hijacked and is going to be reverted to it's original content, the link could be reinstated as well. I don't think it serves any purpose right now. ;)

But you clearly have more wiki-experience than me, so it's your choice to leave it or remove it :)

Best regards, David — Preceding unsigned comment added by MacDada (talk • contribs) 21:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of rich Internet application formats


The article List of rich Internet application formats has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is in fact a Chimera article: While it is called "List of rich Internet application formats", it is a slapdash list consisting of runtime environments and programming languages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codename Lisa (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of rich Internet application formats for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of rich Internet application formats is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of rich Internet application formats until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa (talk) 21:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ArticleBot


The article ArticleBot has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 20:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of ArticleBot for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ArticleBot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ArticleBot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 14:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeroo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeroo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jeroo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JudeccaXIII (talk) 07:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Belfast Coat of Arms
Hi, I wonder if you might be able to advise me of any copyright restrictions connected to the Belfast Coat of Arms image uploaded by yourself? I'm an historian who takes walking tours of the Belfast and I had hoped to use this image as part of flyer and website.

Thanks, Jason Burke jasonrobertburke@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.76.198.136 (talk) 12:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of LIVE555 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LIVE555 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/LIVE555 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 00:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * You could request IP block exemption, but that will only be granted in cases of particular need. A general desire for privacy is not considered sufficient. Huon (talk) 16:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your answer, I will give this a try. Also, I was wondering, and I couldn't find information about this on Wikipedia, what is the reason for IP blocking registered users? Since I'm logged in and I don't have a history of vandalism, presumably it should be safe to unblock me regardless of the IP? Or am I missing something? Laurent (talk) 16:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The block is on the IP address and not on your account, with edits from registered accounts disabled too, and there's no technical way to unblock specific accounts which happen to use that IP address. All we can do at the IP block level is allow/disallow all registered accounts, and at the account level allow/disallow editing through all blocked IP addresses (via IP block exemption). Although IP addresses for registered users are not publicly visible, they are recorded every time an edit is made, and they are frequently used when investigating socking, etc (those with CheckUser privilege can see them). Use of a VPN is one way in which vandals/trolls/socks can hide their real IP addresses, even from CheckUsers, when editing from throwaway registered accounts, and that's essentially why VPNs are blocked when found. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The relevant policy is WP:OPENPROXY; VPNs are considered anonymizing proxies. Huon (talk) 21:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Video game mascot listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Video game mascot. Since you had some involvement with the Video game mascot redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Locate32


The article Locate32 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FireTune


The article FireTune has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable; no mention in reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. w umbolo  ^^^  16:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of FireTune for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FireTune is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FireTune until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. w umbolo  ^^^  18:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Seeking permission from the original copyright holder of "World map with tropic of cancer"
Dear Rights Holder,

I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish World map with tropic of cancer under a CC BY license and complete the last part (after the 3 stars) of the following form: Content Permission Form Content Permission Form.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,

--DCouvin (talk) 19:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

David Couvin

Email1: david.couvin@googlemail.com

Email2: dcouvin@pasteur-guadeloupe.fr

Proposed deletion of Harry's Filters


The article Harry's Filters has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG, non-notable Photoshop filters."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:User Good Article Interwiki
Template:User Good Article Interwiki, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Good Article Interwiki and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:User Good Article Interwiki during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Joplin
Salut Laurent,

I have linked the English and French articles ;-). And thank you for the application. --Dom (talk) 15:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)