User talk:Currywurry

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Deiaemeth 00:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Erm, stop adding irrelevant materials to Huddersfield article please! Repeated vandalisms may get you banned from Wikipedia. Your constructive contributions will be always welcomed, though. Deiaemeth 10:18, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Your unwelcome vandalism to the other articles, since you became a user last night have also been reverted. Did you become a user just to be a vandal? If so you are not being constructive, just destructive. 86.2.138.123 10:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm not a vandal...
...i'm just bored. I only make minor changes, and typically to articles that i know get reverted in minutes. No problem with that, is there?

Yes, there is. The problem is that it is contrary to Wikipedia's mission and it wastes the time of serious contributors who have to clean up the situation. Please, there are other Wikis that are ripe for this kind of treatment, such as Uncyclopedia. Perhaps they would be sympathetic to your mission. --bitewOrms 00:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)


 * No, Uncyclopedia is a very good and well written piece of work, while Wikipedia is a shameless parody.

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Deiaemeth 23:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Please don't create non-encyclopaedic articles here. Uncyclopedia would be a much better place for a work like Second coming of Jesus, and people would actually get to read it rather than having to spend their time deleting it. Pseudomonas 13:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page William Jackson (secretary) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Other persons thoughts
THIS GUY IS WIN - Anon

The world needs more cowbell; and more currywurry! - Anon

This man, is perhaps, the worlds best of everything. - Anon

Do not fear, my children!
Your messiah has returned, to make more enlightening edits to the Huddersfield article, and to mislead 11 year olds into putting on an essay that the third coming of Jesus was responsible for the rise of Hitler and his Third Reich in the Arctic.

You have been blocked for a period of 6 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. -- VS talk 16:38, 16 December 2008 (UTC)