User talk:Curtis23/Archive 1

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  TJ   Spyke   17:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.   TJ   Spyke   17:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Prowrestling.net is not a reliable source.  TJ   Spyke   18:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

SummerSlam
STOP. You are hurting the article and making it look ugly by putting in WAY too many pictures. Only a handful of pictures are needed, not every match wrestler participating needs to have a picture in the article. Stop putting them back in.  TJ   Spyke   20:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It's NOT helping the article. See the tag that you deleted for no reason, there is such a thing as article having too many pictures (which this article definitely has too many). It's hurting the article and makes it look ugly by squeezing the test (the IMPORTANT part of the article) together and making it look ugly.  TJ   Spyke   01:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Except the tag IS right. You may like putting way too many pictures in articles (which you admit), but you are wrong here. There are way too many pictures in the article and they WILL be removed (either by me or someone else). Not every match needs to be represented by a picture. Articles are not picture galleries.  TJ   Spyke   01:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * And you will be blocked for edit warring if others agree to remove the pictures and you keep removing them. Try taking a look at other PPV articles to see the correct way to do it (like Lockdown (2008), which is a Featured Article). No sane person could think the article looks good with all those pictures cramming the text and table together. I don't get how you can't see how you are hurting the article.  TJ   Spyke   01:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

There are too many pictures on that article. GO to the article talkpage rather than replying to one user. Darrenhusted (talk) 01:37, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Darrenhusted (talk) 01:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I regret to inform you that you've been blocked for 24 hours due to your edit warring. In the future, please discuss controversial changes on the talk page and pursue dispute resolution as needed. If you wish to contest this block, you may add to your talk page. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 05:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The general rule is that PPV's don't get articles until they are about 2 months away (the exception being WrestleMania and Bound for Glory). There is no info that would go into the SS article yet and it would just be a stub.  TJ   Spyke   21:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no info out there about the 2009 event. Create something on a testpage first and show that to some experienced editors. Articles are not test grounds.  TJ   Spyke   21:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * User page.  TJ   Spyke   22:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  TJ   Spyke   00:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Because WWE has not announced a "WrestleMania XXVII". They have not announced any PPV's after WrestleMania XXVI. Once WWE announces WrestleMania XVII, then a article on it can be created. Right now no such event even exists and would violate WP:CRYSTALBALL. Will it happen? Almost certainly, but you can't speculate.  TJ   Spyke   00:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
About 2 1/2 months away and 3 PPV's before it (Breaking Point, Hell in a Cell, Bragging Rights). There is no info about the event other than date and location.  TJ   Spyke   18:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * What info? The standard info that is in EVERY PPV article (like the warning about wrestling being fake)?  TJ   Spyke   18:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * A article has to be able to survive deletion the moment its created. At that point the article can be re-created, work on it in a subpage for now.  TJ   Spyke   18:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Nothing has changed in the last 4 days.  TJ   Spyke   23:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. 'Edits like this one are considered refactoring of others' comments. Please look over that very important policy.' —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 05:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Your userpage
Hi there. I saw you've been in a bit of a dispute over an article on your userpage. It is in fact allowed for you to write articles in the userspace if they are works in progress, but usually, they are done as user subpages rather than on the main userspace (for example: User:Curtis23/Title). I don't think there's any rule against it being on your main userpage, but still, I strongly suggest using a subpage (keeps your userpage available for info on you). Also, if you do draft an article in your userspace, please don't put the page in any article categories (for example, this revision puts your userpage into the Category:2009 in professional wrestling, which is prohibited, as that category is only for live articles). One more thing: articles in the userspace are meant to be temporary, until they're ready for the article space, so if you keep them for a long time without working on them, they may end up deleted via miscellany for deletion. Hope this clarifies things a bit. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 08:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

RE
First off, the list is too small to begin with and even if we needed to keep track of all the champions, it would have to remain in the main article till there was 10 champions, or at least 9 and a 10th one was likely. The Unified Tag Team Championship is just a term. All the champions are already tracked with the two title lists. The lead is meant to summarize the article and some of the championship's history. See List of TNA X Division Champions, List of TNA Women's Knockout Champions, List of CZW World Heavyweight Champions, etc. Good for your first try though.-- Will C  23:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I got use to doing FLs, I've got around 10 so far. Thought to be blunt, it sticks longer. My bad-- Will C  23:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Only the Cena/Orton, Punk/Undertaker, and DX/Legacy matches are in HIAC.  TJ   Spyke   05:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  TJ   Spyke   21:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Note about Zack Ryder
There is NO consensus to make it an article, so stop reverting it back. RobJ1981 (talk) 21:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

TLC
Why are you so insistent on making PPV articles extremely early? I do not want to have to go through this with you on every PPV. It's too early to start an article on the event.  TJ   Spyke   22:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 2 months away from the event. That would be mid-October for this event (since it's December 13). It won't kill you to actually wait, no would it hurt the article since it would just be a stub for the next few weeks anyways.  TJ   Spyke   23:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Warning
Do NOT post fake messages claiming I agreed with you. You very well know that I don't agree with the split of Curt Hawkins and Zack Ryder. RobJ1981 (talk) 23:01, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  TJ   Spyke   16:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * WWE has not announced a Backlash 2010 event or a WrestleMania XXVII event, you can't assume they will happen (especially Backlash, considering WWE's love of re-naming PPV's lately).  TJ   Spyke   16:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Edit Warring
I am filing a complaint against your edits in Zack Ryder. This message to you is part of the process. If you do not respond to the complaints, and continue your unjustified reverts, it is likely you will be blocked from editing. avs5221 (talk) 21:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

A note
Hi. Please note that while I'm not going to take action against you at the moment, any further disruption on Zack Ryder will lead to an immediate block. When involved in a dispute, please utilize discussion pages to come to a reasonable solution. Thank you. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * One more revert on Mike Mizanin you will have violated the 3RR. Listen, the image you uploaded is copywritten. It is owned by the WWE and you have presented no proof that they have given you permission to use that image anyway we see fit. Thus we can not use a copywritten image that is not released under fair-use. Even if it was under a fair-use license, we have free-use images already available of The Miz, so we don't need it.-- Will C  21:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * ThinkBlue is a she. Go ahead, add that part in. In fact I'll just do it.-- Will C  22:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs
I just wanted to let you know if you don't know already that your edits on here can be considered to be Edit Warring, if you wish to have input on the subject, please leave your comments here on the subject Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling I'm telling you this incase to hope avoid the conflict. Afro Talkie Talk - Afkatk 08:56, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Miss WrestleMania
Please keep this page as a redirect. Afro Talkie Talk - Afkatk 21:08, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

The Undertaker edits
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Undertaker has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 23:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009 2
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-- Coldplay   Expert  23:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a different title by copying its content and pasting it into. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 23:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Survivor Series (2009). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  TJ   Spyke   00:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 01:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Zack Ryder support
No. As I said on the page, the behavior behind the request prevents me from taking it seriously. Please also note that posting a message on a user's talk page asking them to support you is a violation of Canvassing. Even if I did support the idea at this point, my input would be thrown out because of the canvassing. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Final warning
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Unified WWE Tag Team Champions


The article List of Unified WWE Tag Team Champions has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This lists offers nothing new. There is no actual title, it's just 2 separate titles held together. Both title already have their own history lists here on Wikipedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  TJ   Spyke   00:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Unified WWE Tag Team Champions
I have nominated List of Unified WWE Tag Team Champions, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of Unified WWE Tag Team Champions. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  TJ   Spyke   00:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Just to let you know, you voted twice in the AfD for List of Unified WWE Tag Team Champions. You don't have to erase your comments, but you may want to delete the second Keep that you put in there before someone else notices.  HAZardousMATT toxic 22:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Cool It
I just wanted to kindly ask you to cool this Zack Ryder business, in time I'm sure he will establish himself enough to get his own page, and I do feel you are violating WP:POINT, I would hate to see a passionate editor such as yourself get thrown off Wikipedia for something as silly as this, so I'm just asking you if would consider dropping it and changing your Timestamp. Afro Talkie Talk - Afkatk 07:12, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Seriously dude if you keep up violating WP:POINT by keeping that Zack Ryder stuff in your Timestamp, you're going to end up blocked and I would hate to see that happen. Afro  Talkie Talk - Afkatk 22:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

3RR
If you haven't already, familiarize yourself with WP:3RR. You've done two revisions to Curt Hawkins and Zack Ryder in 24 hours. The second was attributed to good faith, but you need to make sure you're aware of 3RR to prevent blocks.  HAZardousMATT toxic 02:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You already added this information once, and it was removed. You've added it again. Before you get blocked for edit warring, take any disputes to the talk page of the article.  HAZardousMATT toxic 21:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
No such match between Mysterio and Undertaker has been announced for Royal Rumble. Before you try to say it, it was NOT announced at the SmackDown tapings (they already announced earlier on the show that the winner of Mysterio/Batista will get the title shot next week on SmackDown).  TJ   Spyke   01:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

RFA
I removed your RFA from the RFA page as you have yet to answer the first two questions. Looking at your talk page, I would suggest that you hold off on an RFA, as it is likely to fail. I hate to bring you the bad news, but the current standards of administratorship are pretty lofty these days. If you would like some coaching, feel free to go here. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm going to save you the drama and allow you to withdraw it in the next ten minutes, otherwise I will close it per WP:NOTNOW. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I closed it. Please consider coaching of adoption though as your heart is in the right place and I know that you will vastly benefit from it. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)