User talk:CurtisEdward

Thank you, Keakealani. Perhaps we can talk sometime. To the editor's comments on "pretensions of perceptions," it is a valid subject of epistemology, it was missing, so I decided to add it. Also, I'm new here and perhaps I did not properly construct the page? I do need help, which is what Keekealani offered, but I'm even confused by how to talk. I will be waiting for comments, thanks. CurtisEdward 01:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Synopticon
Hi Curtis, I noticed that you created the article Great Ideas of the Western World. I have turned the article into a redirect to A Syntopicon: An Index to The Great Ideas. I am not an expert on these matters and I would be happy to discuss it with you.

Separately, could I ask that you use the syntax ~ only for pages that are not articles as wikipedia articles are a description of the subject and shouldn't have user names within them. Using that syntax on pages such as talk pages is strongly recommended.

The welcome message above is a good one to browse around to get used to wikipedia but I would also be happy to offer support. You can get hold of me at my talk page. MLA 16:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Am I allowed after the paragraphys above, to then reference my own Talk page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CurtisEdward (talk • contribs)


 * Hello, CurtisEdward! I have removed the helpme tag and your question from the Pretensions of perceptions article, moving it here instead, to your talk page. I also noticed that you said: but I'm even confused by how to talk.


 * Well, to answer that question—this page is your talk page, where other people can leave you messages, and you can, in turn, respond as well. To do this, simply edit this page (like you would a normal article) and add your comments. To edit the page, click on the "edit this page" tab at the top of the page.


 * It is usually customary to:


 * Add new messages to the bottom of the page;
 * Create a new section when you wish to start discussing a new topic
 * Indent your replies below those of others, using the relevant number of colons, e.g.: :, ::, or :::, etc.
 * Sign your messages by typing four tildes at the end, like so: ~


 * For more information, please see Talk page guidelines. You are welcome to leave a reply here, and I will try to help with whatever other questions you might have. If you wish, you can also join the #wikipedia-bootcamp IRC channel to chat in real-time, or use the web-based client for instant access. —Xhantar Talk 18:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi again! Just wanted to let you know that I've moved the comments you made about the Pretensions of perceptions article, to the article's talk page instead. Just like all users on Wikipedia have their own talk pages, all articles also have their own talk pages, and that is where discussion about the article itself should take place. To get to an article's talk page, click on the "discussion" tab you'll see at the top of the page while viewing the article. —Xhantar Talk 18:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi! Me again. The people in #wikipedia-bootcamp are friendly and don't mind helping, but they are likely also busy on Wikipedia itself and, as such, might take a while to notice questions and respond. I don't think I was there when you joined earlier, but I am now, if you want to chat.


 * Just a few extra notes:


 * When you add the helpme tag, please do so on your talk page (this page) and not on the article you need help with. This is not an absolute rule and you won't break anything by doing so, but it helps to keep discussion in one place. Also, placing a helpme tag in an article will probably just confuse informal visitors.


 * You can reply to my comments here instead of on my talk page, although either will work just fine. Replying here, though, will again help to keep discussion in one place. I am watching your talk page and will notice when you have responded. —Xhantar Talk 19:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Xhantar, I didnot realize the factual numbers of references to the subject would be for discussion. It was meant to support the idea that the subject "pretensions of perceptions" was important enough not to delete completely. Would it be different if my own comment did not addend the info? Thanks CurtisEdward 19:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pretensions_of_perceptions"


 * Sorry for the delay in my replying; I got a bit tied up with another editor, but that is now sorted.


 * Alright! Back to Pretensions of perceptions. The reason the article was proposed for deletion is because another user felt that its subject and/or content (as it now stands) might be more suited for a dictionary (such as Wiktionary, a sister project of Wikipedia) than for an encyclopedia (Wikipedia). You can read the official policy page here: Wikipedia is not a dictionary


 * However, if you don't agree with this assertion or otherwise object to the article's deletion, feel free to remove the template from the page, but do explain why you don't agree on the article's talk page, and please try to further improve the article by (in this case, specifically) sourcing its content sufficiently.


 * While doing so, you might consider adding the underconstruction template to the page, to let other users know that you are busy further expanding/improving the article.


 * Hope this helps! —Xhantar Talk 22:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)