User talk:CusaboEmpress

Welcome!
Hello, CusaboEmpress, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Cusabo did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome.  Grey joy talk 10:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

So the very FACT that I AM Cusabo makes no difference then right? How is it robots and colonists have more say in my peoples story than we do? This article is FALSE and misleading. You participate in the genocide of my people to continue the narrative that we are extinct. We are not. LET PEOPLE KNOW THE TRUTH!!! CusaboEmpress (talk) 10:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * That's exactly right. Think of Wikipedia as a repository of knowledge. It's not somewhere to discuss new knowledge (or even old knowledge). It's just a place to gather the accumulated knowledge of reliable sources. Activism has no place here. Blackmane (talk) 01:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 11:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

When real history is hidden what source is there beyond FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE? This article is false and misleading. CusaboEmpress (talk) 11:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately if there are no sources beyond first hand knowledge then the info is not suitable for wikipedia since we only document what is in reliable secondary sources rather than going by what individual editors believe to be the WP:truth. In my opinion, if you have good evidence from your first hand knowledge for your claims, there will actually be plenty of people in the world who would be interested in them, be they "colonialists" or whatever. These are the people you will need to talk to. Once your claims are well accepted and well covered in such sources, a process which may take years, then we can add them to our article. But not before then. And if for whatever reason you are unable to convince other sources to document and accept your claims, then they will never appear. Wikipedia isn't the place to WP:right great wrongs. Nil Einne (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)