User talk:Cusimar9

Welcome
Hello, Cusimar9, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--OnoremDil 10:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

First Choice Vacation Homes
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with First Choice Vacation Homes. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --OnoremDil 10:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's talk page.


 * You asked what you could do to improve this article. Even if it is not considered advertising (and the point is arguable as the article now stands) the article might be deleted if it does not assert its significance of the subject or the subject is considered not notable. Please look at our speedy delete criteria, particularly section A7 (unremarkable people, groups, bands or companies). Please also read our notability guiideline for companies. Has there been non-trivial independant press coverage, or other secondary sources writing about this firm? if so, please add citations to a few to the article. That would help to establish notability. DES (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Santos higham farm
A tag has been placed on Santos higham farm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~ Excesses ~ (talk) 12:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Santo's Higham Farm for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santo's Higham Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Santo's Higham Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)