User talk:Cuzandor

Bastard
This guy's a bastard he said colored breasts look awful! But asian tits rule! LOL

you sunuvabitch —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.184.167.20 (talk • contribs).


 * Do not engage in personal attacks on Wikipedia. No matter who they are aimed at, they are never tolerated here.  Cuzandor, I've added a warning tag to this IP user's talk page.  Kasreyn 04:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Rat_trap.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rat_trap.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page User:OrphanBot on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.  Funky Monkey   (talk)   01:58, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Your edits on Penguin
Please do not add nonsense or jokes to the article. It is considered vandalism. Zarniwoot 20:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi Cuzandor. I was refering to you edits of the image captions. In regard to flying penguins and theories about lorentz forces and chaos theory, you need to cite a reputable reference. See Verifiability. Zarniwoot 21:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Shred Guitar
This is not the proper way to contribute to wikipedia: ''Well, shut up. Waldir Azevedo was the fastest cavaquinho player of his time. He had a technical proficiency that went way beyond of what those "shredders" ever dreamed of at that time!'' Você deve ser mais educado quando tentar justificar suas inclusões. It doesn´t matter how good Waldir Azevedo could be on the Cavaquinho, this article is about Shred Guitar. By the way it´s also your opinion, and to be included into wikipedia it must be verifiable (by external reliables sources). While I do have a lot of respect for him, mainly because of my father´s influencies on my musical taste, I think we should not mix things up in wikipedia. I think you´re new here. Politeness is always expected towards other wikipedians. We assume good faith everytime unless proved the contrary. Why didn´t you expand the article about Waldir Azevedo instead of listing him incorrectly on the Shred Guitar article. A good source for this follows:


 * Waldir Azevedo 27/1/1923   21/9/1980


 * Biografia


 * Compositor e cavaquinista que mais contribuiu para a divulgação do choro nos anos 50, foi o compositor dos clássicos "Brasileirinho", "Pedacinhos do Céu" e o baião "Delicado", que alcançou enorme sucesso nos Estados Unidos na versão do maestro Percy Faith, entre muitos outros choros. Criado nos subúrbios do Rio de Janeiro, aprendeu flauta, violão e cavaquinho na infância. Mais tarde trabalhou na companhia de energia Light, emprego que abandonou em 1945 para ocupar a vaga de cavaquinho no regional de Dilermando Reis, na Rádio Clube do Brasil. No final de 1949 lançou o disco que continha "Brasileirinho", um enorme sucesso comercial em todo o mundo. Azevedo excursionou pela Europa, Japão e Estados Unidos tocando suas músicas. Algumas dessas turnês eram bancadas pelo Itamaraty, numa iniciativa de divulgar a música brasileira. Com mais de 20 LPs gravados, mudou-se para Brasília em 1971, onde viveu até a sua morte.

Regards Loudenvier 13:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Responding to your comments on my user page (in portuguese):
 * Waldir Azevedo não deve estar na página de Guitar Shredders. Cavaquinho é um instrumento completamente diferente. Pelo mesmo motivo não se deveria incluir um violinista na lista também (a menos que fosse reconhecido como um Shreder da guitarra elétrica, como The Great Kat o é). Waldir Azevedo certamente não teve qualquer influência no desenvolvimento do gênero, principalmente porque os guitarristas pioneiros do gênero não deram qualquer atenção aos "tocadores de cavaquinho" (talvez estivessem muito errados nesta opção...). O artigo deve ser consistente com seu título e seu conteúdo. Ele descreve um sub-gênero do metal (e apenas do metal) que surgiu praticamente no ano da morte de Waldir Azevedo. Não quero com isto diminuir sua contribuição ao mundo musical, mas não posso admitir que ele tenha qualquer coisa a ver com o Shred Guitar. Além disso o gênero é até muitas vezes considerado pejorativamente por músicos profissionais, que consideram a busca da velocidade como uma fuga da verdadeira alma da música (o mesmo que acontece com virtuosismo, que as vezes é visto sob uma ótica pejorativa). Não acredito que Waldir Azevedo enquadre-se nesses termos, pois sua música é dotada de grande presença de espírito e profundidade, não apenas dificuldade técnica e velocidade. Loudenvier 21:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

If you really are new to Wikipedia,
I recommend you avoid exchanges of the kind you engaged in with Nandesuka on Talk:Circumcision. Your statements were rude and condescending, and you're lucky you chose such a calm and unvengeful admin as Nandesuka to attack. If I were an admin and you chose to deliberately insult me in such a way, you would already be blocked. As always, I'm impressed by Nandesuka's fairness. You owe him an apology.

Whether or not you apologize, though, you should definitely avoid being rude and condescending to other users on Wikipedia. It's one of the fastest possible ways to get in trouble and get blocked here. Best of luck, Kasreyn 16:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Re: your reply on my talk page. Just because you refuse to admit your comments to Nandesuka were insulting and condescending doesn't make it so.  You said, and I quote:
 * Are you circumcised nandeska?
 * Insultingly familiar and overly personal. After Nandesuka declined to answer your inappropriately personal question, you said, and I quote:
 * That means "yes"
 * Insulting and condescending. No comment means no comment.  Deliberately reading a different meaning into it is disrespectful bullying, not debate.  After Nandesuka (in an amazing show of tolerance) pointed this out to you, you said, and I quote:
 * You don't need to feel ashamed of your body Nandesuka
 * Again, insulting and condescending. You treat Nandesuka as if there is no possible logical reason he might refuse to answer except shame.  You behave as if you know his motivations better than he possibly could himself.  This assumption only displays your own bias, and is inappropriate behavior on Wikipedia.  When Nandesuka pointed this out to you, you still weren't done treating him poorly (again, I quote from you):
 * I take it you have some kind of trauma, so I'll stop now.
 * Insulting, condescending, and a sophomoric attempt to "get the last word" through a personal attack. And yes, it IS a personal attack.  Your words serve the purpose of declaring Nandesuka unfit to debate with because of his "trauma", which is essentially the same as saying "you wouldn't get it, you're too dumb".  This is how children typically try to end a debate they're losing.


 * If you still fail to see how your behavior was childish and unacceptable by Wikipedia's standards, I don't think I can explain it any better. Please do not contact me again unless it's to say you have come to understand the concept of assuming good faith on the part of other Wikipedia editors.  If you go on treating editors with whom you happen to disagree as if they're fools and trash, eventually you're going to insult one who is more easily provoked than Nandesuka, at which point you'll likely wind up blocked.  Kasreyn 19:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Re: your latest reply on my talk page: You understand nothing.  You have no need to continue to fake disingenuousness with someone who was trying to do you a favor.  Apparently you don't want to learn.  I wash my hands of the inevitable consequences of your attitude problem.  Some people just have to learn the hard way.  Kasreyn 03:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page I Can't Believe It's Not Butter on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.  Geneb1955 Talk / CVU 01:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Landless Workers' Movement. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- M P er el ( talk 04:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Landless Workers' Movement
Hi Cuzander, you sound very passionate about the topic : ) As you appear relatively new, let me first give you a few links to Wikipedia policies you should familiarize yourself with that govern our editing here: Citing sources, no original research, neutral point of view, verifiability, what Wikipedia is not.

The basic thing to remember is that Wikipedia writes from an impersonal, neutral outsider perspective without judgment (i.e., editors' personal views and feelings should not seep through the writing). So for example, an article would never declare a group is terrorist. It is appropriate however, to cite verifiable reputable sources that make statements alleging a group to be terrorist. For example, at Hamas, the article states, "It is listed as a terrorist organization by Australia, Canada, the European Union, Israel, and the United States, [8] and is banned in Jordan.[9]" and it provides sources with government statements to that effect backing up the claim. It would be inappropriate, however, for Wikipedia itself to describe Hamas as a terrorist organization. The same applies to Landless Workers' Movement. Is the difference more clear? -- M P er el ( talk 04:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Feral Pigeon
Hi Carlos. Anything not protected by law could be considered a free lunch, eg rats, earthworms, crows, but the statement is pointless unless you are suggesting that feral pigeons are actually regularly eaten. In the UK, where these birds are abundant and a pest, I have not heard of them being eaten. Pigeons for food are either domesticated (therefore not free) or a different species, the Wood Pigeon. Wild feral pigeons are avoided because of the health risk. If the consumption of wild feral pigeons takes place on a significant scale, you need to be more specific, but even then I would query whether "free lunch" is an encyclopedic descriptor, jimfbleak 05:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Tasty water
Your recent edit to Tasty water was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 18:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Re:hair article
I'm Italian, but I'm not furry ;). Please keep content on Wikipedia encyclopediac.  This sort of comment would only belong on Ethnic stereotypes in popular culture, so please take it there if you're not satisfied with its reversion.  Fabricationary 01:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Talk:England
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:England. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Robdurbar 06:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments such as this are not suitable for Wikipedia. Please refrain from such behaviour. Jooler 21:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Survey request
Hi,

I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, BCeagle0312 (talk) 18:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Cuzandor! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Francesco Fareri -

Articles for deletion nomination of Francesco Fareri
I have nominated Francesco Fareri, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Francesco Fareri. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  MBisanz  talk 13:17, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Tasty water.jpg


The file File:Tasty water.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Pontedamizade.jpg


The file File:Pontedamizade.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)