User talk:Cuzkozski

Nomination of The Tenenbaum Family for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Tenenbaum Family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Tenenbaum Family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your contributions
Hello. We've redirected your articles to The Royal Tenenbaums. As per Wikipedia guidelines on notability, characters in films that have not received significant independent coverage (e.g., Rocky Balboa and the like) are typically pointed towards the film article. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask, or head on over to WP:TEAHOUSE for guidance and help from other editors. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:05, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jared Rattenbury


The article Jared Rattenbury has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Oddbodz (talk) 13:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Rattenbury
Hello Cuzkozski,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chris Rattenbury for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Surfer43 (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jared Rattenbury


A tag has been placed on Jared Rattenbury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Henry Sherman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry Sherman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Henry Sherman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. InvadingInvader (talk) 01:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)