User talk:Cvillalva/sandbox

Peer Review
I liked that you found a study to back up the claim of how dogs play a significant role in the lives of people which creates the human canine bond. Your sources all come from journals so it's good because those will definitely present reliable non biased information which is credible to cite. The edit you made was substantial because it created the connect that was missing in the original Wikipedia article. You also worded your edit well so that it has a neutral tone. Your next step might be to find more sources to add, especially about the human canine connection because the more sources you have well help it to become more credible. Sdunc2 (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Response I appreciate this review of my edits. I will consider adding to my article some more sources relevant to the Human Canine Bond

Peer Review
Your edits are extremely useful. By incorporating research, credible citations, and deleting sentences due to repetition, you are making this source a lot more credible. Every edit you intend on making is far from biased. Instead, the research you are incorporating is very credible. Your citations are proper and they all work when clicked on. None of them are red, therefore, your citations are formatted correctly. The language you use is neutral. I do not believe you need to add anything, I think these edits are great. Sbeau7 (talk) 17:05, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Response Thank you for reviewing my edits. I was careful to avoid a bias tone and made sure all my citations were working