User talk:Cvkcvk

March 2019
Hello, I'm 94rain. I noticed that in this edit to Paris Kassidokostas-Latsis, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 94rain Talk 10:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Dear i have noticed that you have rolled it back,without an explanation too. I have submitted the reason of this change,the name is written falsely, and you have changed it to the false name again. And the goo sip too. Can you explain the reason of this inappropriate behavior. You are changing something so fast without checking it if it is correct and vandalise a page or an edit.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Template:Because you thanked me. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 94rain Talk 11:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

you are spelling the name wrong dear!the name is as i edited and you edited wrong
 * Hi, why did you delete Kassidokostas? Was not it his name?-- 94rain  Talk 11:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Re: My talk page message
Please note that I know absolutely nothing about Mr. Latsis and was only cleaning up the page. If you notice any misinformation or want to suggest any more edits, please go to the talk page of the article and write there, remembering to always cite reliable sources for what you want to change. Welcome to Wikipedia and remember to always assume good faith of other editors. – Þjarkur (talk) 11:16, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Dear what do you mean, you have edited a million times with false information.
 * Is that responsible from you?Since you do not know nothing???????


 * To make changes you have to show you are right by providing reliable sources. See WP:RS WP:CITE.-- 94rain  Talk 11:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Please see the version of the page before I cleaned some of it up. The material in question was there before. You'll need to find news articles or books showing that the information is untrue. I will also repeat: Please assume good faith of other editors. – Þjarkur (talk) 11:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Question
Dear i have noticed that you have roll back a my edit, you have to state why you did that. Currently you have wrong bday date, wrong name in the small box and many gossip rumors etc. Could you please explain how this page is correct and my edit was wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cvkcvk (talk • contribs) 09:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia works on the principle of verifiability. Only information for which there exist reliable sources should be added. See also: Verifiability, not truth.
 * Your edits did not cite reliable sources, so other editors were unable to verify the information. The section you wanted removed for being "gossip" did not actually look like gossip, just seemed to state the fact that they were engaged. He publicly discussed their engagement with the press and it appears he was somewhat well known at the time for being engaged to her. See An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing.
 * – Þjarkur (talk) 12:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

could you please tell me where have you found that this age is the correct. also any gossip tabloid states that is it your verified source of somenone?