User talk:Cwhillubbyy

March 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cheshire cheese have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cheshire cheese was changed by Cwhillubbyy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953302 on 2021-03-18T00:03:11+00:00

Please do not add or change content, as you did at British big cats, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Hellhound. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bruce Stafford


A tag has been placed on Bruce Stafford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/sociology/people/bruce.stafford. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crymeareaver (talk) 01:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bruce Stafford


A tag has been placed on Bruce Stafford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Crymeareaver (talk) 01:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello Cwhillubbyy -- I have removed the copyright-infringing material and moved the article to draftspace so that you can develop it: Draft:Bruce Stafford. I don't know, however, whether the subject is sufficiently notable for inclusion.
 * Importantly, I am concerned about the creation of this article on top of a redirect created by a complicated set of moves; it seems possible that it was intended to evade scrutiny for the article. Have you been paid to contribute this article or do you have any conflict of interest relating to it? If so you must disclose it immediately, following the instructions in the linked policy. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 05:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Your edit to Draft:William Guppy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''Copyvio has already once been removed from that page (when it was about somebody else); please make sure you do not again copy material from non-free external sources. Thanks,'' Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Stop
Just stop moving pages around. I don't know if you lack the competence to do this correctly or if its being maliciously done but you absolutely cannot delete years of edits in an article about a different person to create an article about an entirely different subject. It's highly disruptive. Go through WP:AFC if you wish to publish new articles. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Bruce Stafford (academic). Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I warned you about this yesterday, but you appear to have taken no notice – your additions today to Bruce Stafford (academic) were copy-paste copyright violations of this and this. That can't be permitted here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Madonna and child (Bellini)


The article Madonna and child (Bellini) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This isn't quite a DAB and it isn't an article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 02:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Madonna and child (Bellini)


The article Madonna and child (Bellini) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)