User talk:Cwmhiraeth/Archive 6

/Archive 5

WikiCup 2012 January newsletter
WikiCup 2012 is off to a flying start. At the time of writing, we have 112 contestants; comparable to last year, but slightly fewer than 2010. Signups will remain open for another week, after which time they will be closed for this year. Our currrent far-away leader is, due mostly to his work on a slew of good articles about The X-Files; there remain many such articles waiting to be reviewed at good article candidates. Second place is currently held by, whose points come mostly from good articles about television episodes, although good article reviews, did you knows and an article about a baroness round out the score. In third place is, who has scored 200 points for his work on a single featured article, as well as points for work on others, mostly in the area of pop music. In all, nine users have 100 or more points. However, at the other end of the scale, there are still dozens of participants who are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly!

The 64 highest scoring participants will advance to round 2 in a month's time. There, they will be split into eight random groups of eight. The score needed to reach the next round is not at all clear; last year, 8 points guaranteed a place. The year before, 20.

A few participants and their work warrant a mention for achieving "firsts" in this competition.
 * was the first to score, with his good article review of Illinois v. McArthur.
 * was also the first to score points for an article, thanks to his work on Hurricane Debby (1982)- now a good article. Tropical storms have featured heavily in the Cup, and good articles currently have a relatively fast turnaround time for reviews.
 * was the first to score points for a did you know, with Russian submarine K-114 Tula. Military history is another subject which has seen a lot of Cup activity.
 * is also the first person to successfully claim bonus points. Terminator 2: Judgment Day is now a good article, and was eligible for bonus points because the subject was covered on more than 20 other Wikipedias at the start of the competition. It is fantastic to see bonus points being claimed so early!
 * was the first to score points for an In the News entry, with Paedophryne amauensis. The lead image from the article was also used on the main page for a time, and it's certainly eye-catching!
 * was the first to score points for a featured article, and is, at the moment, the only competitor to claim for one. The article, "Halo" (Beyoncé Knowles song), was also worth double points because of its wide coverage. While this is an article that Jivesh and others have worked on for some time, it is undeniable that he has put considerable work into it this year, pushing it over the edge.

We are yet to see any featured lists, featured topics or good topics, but this is unsurprising; firstly, the nomination processes with each of these can take some time, and, secondly, it can take a considerable amount of time to work content to this level. In a similar vein, we have seen only one featured article. The requirement that content must have been worked on this year to be eligible means that we did not expect to see these at the start of the competition. No points have been claimed for featured portals or pictures, but these are not content types which are often claimed; the former has never made a big impact on the WikiCup, while the latter has not done so since 2009's competition.

A quick rules clarification before the regular notices: If you are concerned that another user is claiming points inappropriately, please contact a judge to take a look at the article. Competitors policing one another can create a bad atmosphere, and may lead to inconsistencies and mistakes. Rest assured that we, the judges, are making an effort to check submissions, but it is possible that we will miss something. On a loosely related note: If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you. It is a great honour. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Culcita novaeguineae
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

And another well-deserved one!

 * Thank you again! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Elysia serca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Thalassia and Elysia


 * Crassadoma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mutualism


 * Elysia rufescens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Reunion


 * Gersemia rubiformis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Substrate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Luidia clathrata
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Mulinia lateralis
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Elysia serca
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Halophila engelmannii
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK Review note
Sandy Georgia (Talk) 17:13, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK Review note
Sandy Georgia (Talk) 17:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Downing Hall
Hello! Your submission of Downing Hall at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Froggerlaura (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Marine fungi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mutualism


 * Pisaster ochraceus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Decapod

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Crassadoma
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Downing Hall
Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Deep Blue
The current message on the web page is not quite enough to be considered "free". What you would need to do is get in contact with the copyright holder and have them release the images under a license compatible with Commons. To do this, all they need to do is email you explaining that they are the copyright holder, making clear which images are referred to, and a statement that they are happy to release the image under the license agreed. Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 would be the usual one, and is probably compatible with the kinds of usage the copyright holder has in mind. Note that a mere assertion that Wikipedia/Commons can host the file is not enough. You could then forward this message to the OTRS address. For more information, take a look at Requesting copyright permission. J Milburn (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will do as you suggest. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

A Barnstar For You!
Well, thank you very much. I'm fascinated by all these little creatures, joining in the struggle for existence and living their lives so industriously. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pollicipes polymerus
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Deep Blue again
That release looks perfect to me- that's an absolutely thrilling result. With there being as many images on that site as there are, it may well be worth trying to enlist some help on Commons- I'm not sure precisely where to do that, but Commons:Commons:Village pump would be a good place to start. Note that you'll have to submit that email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and quote the ticket number in every upload. J Milburn (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Marine fungi
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Nice work! You've reminded me of my stale draft on fungivory. I seem to be completely unable to write anything longer than a sentence at the moment (at least on WP) so if you ever feel like it, feel free to jump in and finish it off. The current article is crap! Cheers SmartSE (talk) 00:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I had a look at your draft article and it requires quite a bit of work to fill it out. I don't have access to the papers quoted and am just getting involved in a featured article nomination so don't fancy taking it on at the moment. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:43, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Avicennia alba
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Bruguiera cylindrica
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Leptasterias hexactis
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sclerodactyla briareus
The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Avicennia rumphiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Calyx


 * Colochirus quadrangularis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Papilla


 * Molpadiida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Fusiform

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Synonym redirects
Hello! Just to let you know, it's a good idea to make redirects for the synonyms. At least I think it is. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You are probably right, particularly where they are in common use. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * And I think it prevents others from making duplicate articles. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I hadn't thought about that. Have you done so? If so, I apologise. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Of course no need to apologize! :) I routinely do it for all the common names and syns on articles I start. I just did a few for your last article. I think it's a good idea. I should double check. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pearsonothuria
Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you! I find these peculiar sea creatures fascinating and enjoy writing about them. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Laternula elliptica
Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Triactis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chela and Mutualism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Unihemispheric slow-wave sleep
Hi Cwmhiraeth. I see you were going to start reviewing Unihemispheric slow-wave sleep, but removed your comment as you thought someone else was already reviewing it. The previous review Talk:Unihemispheric slow-wave sleep/GA1 was apparently abandoned by the reviewer and closed by. Do you still want to conduct a review of this article or should I tag it for speedy deletion. Currently it looks like someone is reviewing it on the WP:GAN page. AIR corn (talk) 05:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I will have a go at it then. I thought it was a interesting article and that nobody had started reviewing it but found that I was mistaken. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Paterson's Worms
Hi Cwmhiraeth, I've made the last of the changes you've suggested and incorporated the last of the sources. That ought to wrap it up; I think I've done as good a job on that article as I can. Whichever way your review goes is fine with me. Thanks again for taking this on.

Cheers, Reyk YO!  11:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Woohoo! Thanks! Reyk YO!  23:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

GA closure
Please note that belongs on a talk page like Talk:Paterson's worms and not a GAC talk page like Talk:Paterson's worms/GA1. Please correct all instances where you have placed the tag on the wrong page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This is the first GA review I have done and you seem to have already corrected the tag in this case. I will know next time. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Homaxinella balfourensis
Hello! Your submission of Homaxinella balfourensis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Smokeybjb (talk) 21:33, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Puzstai Affair
Thanks for the review. AIR corn (talk) 23:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Pomacanthus xanthometopon at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 February newsletter
Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was, again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was, thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were, , and. February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from. At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.

The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.

The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk &bull; email) and The ed17 (talk &bull; email) 23:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
It's the first nominee that I've offered here, and I probably should have figured that out before two and a half weeks and no response was made that I was doing something wrong. Once again, thanks, I of course I hope that article goes through! LeftAire (talk) 04:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Acanthurus guttatus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Operculum


 * Adamussium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Morphology


 * Homaxinella balfourensis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Antifungal


 * Hypsoblennius invemar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Oil rig


 * Pomacanthus semicirculatus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Operculum


 * Pomacanthus xanthometopon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Blue angelfish


 * Zebrasoma scopas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Spawn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Burton Court
Hi Swmhiraeth, Thanks for your keen eye, and your improvements to the article. Cheers, --Rosiestep (talk) 03:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lybia tessellata
Orlady (talk) 08:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lybia edmondsoni
Orlady (talk) 08:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Triactis
Orlady (talk) 08:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Homaxinella balfourensis
What a great day. Thank you Victuallers (talk) 08:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Adamussium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Adductor muscle


 * Aspidodiadematidae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Extant


 * Menticirrhus saxatilis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Barbel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Fucus radicans
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life
Thought you might like to see what others think. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Rhinecanthus verrucosus
Orlady (talk) 16:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Acanthurus guttatus
Orlady (talk) 16:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Zebrasoma scopas
Orlady (talk) 16:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pomacanthus xanthometopon
Orlady (talk) 16:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pomacanthus semicirculatus
Orlady (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Aspidodiadema jacobi
The DYK project (nominate) 21:10, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Megabalanus tintinnabulum
The DYK project (nominate) 05:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Melithaea ochracea
Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Menticirrhus americanus
Hello! Your submission of Menticirrhus americanus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Rlendog (talk) 14:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15
Hi. When you recently edited Menticirrhus americanus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Much obliged for taking on the GAR for James I of Scotland and for the improvement suggestions and for then passing it. Best regards, --Bill Reid | (talk) 14:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Menticirrhus americanus
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Western Jackdaw
Okay, I got a burst of energy and had a big rethink, and found some more material on behaviour and displays. I've added and rejigged so it (to me) reads more cohesively and less fragmentedly. Still to add a bit more on some behaviours. Also, there is the dilemma about material that can either go under subspecies or description. To whit from the source (which I will add once we figure out the best place) - "There is very little geographic variation in size. The main differences are the presence or absence of a whitish partial collar at the base of the nape, the darkness or shading of the nape between light and dark grey, and the tone of the underparts. Populations in central Asia have slightly larger wings and spermologus has a slightly heavier bill. Body colour becomes darker as one moves further north, in mountain regions and humid climates and lighter in the opposite. However, individual variation, particularly with juveniles and also worn plumage in the months before premoult (after April), can often be greater than geographic differences."

Also the dilemma - of how much descriptive material to move out of subspecies into description.....

thoughts? Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I haven't done anything to the article since my original input in February but it looks improved by what you have been doing. I'll think about the subspecies issue. You can see how I dealt with the problem in an article that I recently expanded, the Common toad. From the point of view of GA, we could go for it sometime soon, because the criteria don't require the article to be complete. On the other hand, you may prefer to wait till later in the year when the points will be more worthwhile in the WikiCup. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I've had this bird on my radar for so long I think I'm keen on just pushing it to GA/FA sooner rather than later. I felt blocked for a long time but then after a bit of a break sat down on the weekend and it all seemed to slot into place nicely. Yes I can see the toad one and I tthink that is the way to go. I have just found some other taxonomic material on jackdaw subspecies to add so it will not look so thin minus descriptors. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, let's go for it then. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay then - gimme a couple of days to extract some more data and then have a look. Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have made some trivial improvements to the formatting of the references. I think that the lead could be expanded to cover each of the sections in the article and I will work on this. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Been on a roll and added some more stuff - need to go to sleep now and free time unpredictable tomorrow. I'm thinking there is enough content there for GA - trick is the lead and fine-tuning so have a play with it. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have paused on the jackdaw while I have been concentrating on the article I propose to enter in your Core Contest. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Great! I'm glad some folks are taking an interest....Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Homalometron pallidum
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Polysphondylium pallidum
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

This hook is wrong: "The fact was ... that individual cellular slime mould cells are of two distinct mating types?" This hook is wrong. Cellular slime moulds do not have "two distinct mating types." P. pallidum was found to have two in an early article, but a later article left that conclusion up in the air. The main page should not be subject to bad DYK facts for such a long time; correcting this current one is far more important than your trying to defend the incorrect Fucus hook. Sgsfdhd (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Also, your hook and article for Fucus radicans was misdirected; the seaweed speciated recently after the Baltic closed down to a brackish water regime, not after the post-glacial creation of the Baltic Sea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.141.42 (talk) 18:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have replied on the article's talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Re:Adamussium
Of course, I fully understand that it's hard to strike the balance. I've written mycological articles which go into a considerable amount of technical detail. A way to get around this is to provide links to articles which explain the jargon; interwiki links to Wiktionary are also sometimes appropriate. J Milburn (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for European Leaf-toed Gecko
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Common toad
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lucilia bufonivora
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pyrenean Brook Salamander
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Menticirrhus saxatilis
The DYK project (nominate) 16:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Corsican Brook Salamander
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sardinian Brook Salamander
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Iberian Rock Lizard
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

sorry for the conflicts
The back log makes me want to cry. It wasn't like that a couple of years ago. There seems to be only a couple of people who review on a regular basis now, and there are a couple that are very strict that frequently over turn acceptances. I would not mind so much if they would just notify the nom. Just venting. I don't think I am the person you remember. I have had a long absence but I don't even know what ODP means so probably not me. Did not know there was another Ishtar. Take Care.--Ishtar456 (talk) 11:46, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I know how you feel. Some people seldom do reviews but seem to take pleasure in finding close paraphrasing problems in articles already passed as fit for DYK by others. It doesn't encourage other editors who are doing their best in the reviews they undertake. The ODP is the Open Directory Project, DMOZ, where I used to be an editor, but I now feel that Wikipedia is a more worthwhile project. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

OMG, we just conflicted again. I just tried to post here that I was going to start March 10 at the bottom so that we don't crash into each other again. Take Care.--Ishtar456 (talk) 11:55, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well I am stopping now anyway. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Natural approach DYK
Hi Cwmhiraeth! This is just to let you know I left a reply for you at Template:Did you know nominations/Natural approach. Thanks for taking the time to review it. Best —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 14:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have responded there. Sorry about that, it is not the first time that I have missed such a move into mainspace and I really should be more careful. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop posting wrong DYKs on the main page
Cut it out. Wikipedia has no method to correct your bad biology that you insist on posting to the main page.

All you had to do was read the family page at your source or the Wikipedia article on the genus to see what is going on--that's how I found out; I wouldn't know a toad from a lizard if I was paid to swim for it. The specific epithet and your failure to gather information on the genus produced original research that is incorrect.

You did the opposite of this for Polysphondylium pallidum also. You assumed if it was true for the species, it was true for the entire group. Now, every time a reader (the person we write encyclopedias for) goes to the P. pallidum talk page they see this unsupported fact that you simply made up:


 * Did you know ... that individual cellular slime mould cells are of two distinct mating types?

No, I didn't know that, because cellular slime mould cells are not necessarily of two distinct mating types.

Please subtract the P. pallidum WikiCup points and clean up this common midwife toads mess by withdrawing it or finding the real hook. Thanks. 68.107.141.42 (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

This is about the above topic. 68.107.141.42 (talk) 17:35, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK: Common midwife toad
Hi there. I'm sorry to drag this up but I've placed the nomination on hold so we can discuss this. A source for the alternative hook has been provided and, in my humble opinion, it would be an improvement. Would you consider using it to update the article so the alternative hook can be used? Someoneanother 01:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Done :-) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I know this hasn't been pleasant, so your humouring me is doubly appreciated. Someoneanother 13:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Iberian Frog
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup/History/2012/Submissions/Cwmhiraeth
Hey- this is just a quick note to let you know that some of the GA reviews you're submitting are a little light. I have removed Talk:Stresemann's Bushcrow/GA1 and Talk:Article 15 of the Constitution of Singapore/GA1, as they are effectively just rubber-stamping. That is not to say that the review was inappropriate, just that it's not really eligible for WikiCup points. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks, J Milburn (talk) 13:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I've no doubt the work you did was significant, but we have to play it safe with the GA reviews; the last thing we need is the belief that the system could easily be abused/is causing problems. J Milburn (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Libinia dubia
Hello! Your submission of Libinia dubia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for East Canary Gecko
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:03, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Common midwife toad
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 March newsletter
We are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well! , of Pool B, is our highest overall scorer thanks to his prolific writings on television and film. In second place is Pool H's, thanks primarily to work on biological articles, especially in marine biology and herpetology. Third place goes to Pool E's, who also writes primarily on biology (including ornithology and botany) and has already submitted two featured articles this round. Of the 63 contestants remaining, 15 (just under a quarter) have over 100 points this round. However, 25 are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly. 32 contestants, the top two from each pool and the 16 next-highest scorers, will advance to round 3.

Congratulations to, whose impressive File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg became the competition's first featured picture. Also, congratulations to, who claimed good topic points, our first contestant this year to do so, for his work on Featured topics/1982 Atlantic hurricane season. This leaves featured topics and featured portals as the only sources of points not yet utilised. However, as recent statistics from show, no source has yet been utilised this competition to the same extent it has been previously!

It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk &bull; email) and The ed17 (talk &bull; email) 23:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Libinia dubia
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Sugar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Libinia ferreirae
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 07:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lychnorhiza lucerna
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 07:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pelobates syriacus
Orlady (talk) 08:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Astropecten polyacanthus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Specific epithet


 * Clibanarius vittatus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mutualism


 * Dardanus venosus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mutualism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Astropecten polyacanthus
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Re The Sugar Girls DYK nom
Hi. Thanks for your message. I will have a look at the relevant sections and see if I can sort it out. Best wishes, Dwab3 (talk) 11:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've just been through them and changed as many as possible. A lot of them are direct quotations (and attributed), though, so they can't really be changed - and a few others are phrases that can't really be paraphrased (e.g. the names of the authors).  I think it's ok now, but maybe you'd like to look at it again?  (Obviously, the article could be edited to use fewer direct quotations if that is considered preferable - and I don't mind doing that myself - but personally I think the quotations work quite well.)  Dwab3 (talk) 11:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know: Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
 * Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
 * If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

WikiProject Plants Collaboration of the month
I'm attempting to revive the Plant article COTM, and since you're a member of WikiProject Plants, you're being notified about this hopeful revival. Please feel free to propose articles for collaboration, and thanks for your consideration! Northamerica1000(talk) 13:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Truro Cathedral School
Thanks for your note, Cwmhiraeth. I have dealt with the problem you pointed out with this nomination. Moonraker (talk) 18:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Teredo navalis
The Bushranger One ping only 08:42, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Plexaura homomalla
The DYK project (nominate) 01:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Archaster typicus
The DYK project (nominate) 09:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Calyptogena magnifica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Morphology


 * Teredo navalis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Teredo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Halichoeres garnoti
The Bushranger One ping only 00:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Camouflage
Thank you very much for doing the GA Review on Camouflage - my first, and I'm delighted. Many thanks again. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * My pleasure! I am a rather inexperienced reviewer so I hope I got it right. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK - Curious
I see you reviewed my nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Megitza - when will it be marked as passed? --Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 19:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The tick symbol I used means it is approved for DYK. Now it is waiting for someone to add it to the DYK queue to appear on the Wikipedia front page. That person will be another editor, not you, the person who wrote it, nor me, the person who reviewed it. Because you started the article on the 1st April, it should not be long before it appears on the front page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yay! I have one more (Template:Did you know nominations/Jacobus Deketh) DYK left on that page. :D --Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 19:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I will have a look at it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have now reviewed and approved Jacobus Deketh for DYK as well. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I am still going to try and expand Megitza. Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 06:42, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Your DYK
- I forgot it was you, but I reviewed it. Both articles are fine and ready to go. See Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Ecteinascidia_turbinata,_Maritigrella_crozierae. --Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 17:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Philip Humber
Since you were so kind as to give a quick DYK review to Philip Humber's perfect game, I wonder if you would give another quick review for Philip Humber, which and I expanded considerably and added to the hook. We appreciate it. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:35, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

George Hubert Kemp
Thank for your review of George Hubert Kemp. Anne (talk) 18:19, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Dardanus venosus
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Clibanarius vittatus
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Calliactis tricolor
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

John Herbert Hedley
Thank you for your review of John Herbert Hedley. Anne (talk) 00:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * That's OK. I was trying to help clear some of the backlog in DYK where some nominations wait weeks for review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. When you recently edited Villosa arkansasensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morphology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Micah True
Thank you for the review. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 12:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Enigmonia
Hello! Your submission of Enigmonia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Bushranger One ping only 18:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ecteinascidia turbinata
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Maritigrella crozierae
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Limnoperna fortunei
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:08, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Enigmonia
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK problem: Saxifraga spp.
Hello! Your submission of Saxifraga aspera and Saxifraga bryoides at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Stemonitis (talk) 11:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Abralia veranyi
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)