User talk:Cwmhiraeth/Archive 8

DYK for Milicia excelsa
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for Talk:Battle of Grunwald (painting)/GA1
Thanks! By any chance, would you consider helping with some prose issues I have at another GA of mine, Talk:Prussian Homage (painting)/GA1? I am not a native speaker, and there are some issues that I simply cannot fix myself, and those are the ones that the reviewer there listed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:42, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I will have a look at the article you mention. What surprises me is how good your English is (and the English of various other editors for whom it is not their native tongue) and it makes me ashamed to think how feeble we are in the United Kingdom at speaking any language other than our own. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I have been through the article and have made a number of alterations to the prose. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help. And about English... well, it is the global language. No other one matches it with regards to importance, so I think that's a valid excuse :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 21:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Frog
Hello, I see that lately you are editing this article intensively. Do you plan to take it all the way to the GA/FA? I am working now on the Russian version of the article and compare the data with English version which is pretty well developed. I would be rather pleased if you could notify me of any major error you find in the existing data. Thank you, Sir Shurf (talk) 07:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do intend to take Frog to GA/FA. I have been working on it for some time and I do not think that it currently contains information not backed up by reliable sources. Good luck with your article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Very well, thank you, Sir Shurf (talk) 09:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Comatulida
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Neutral notice of an RfC
A Request for Comment has been posted for an article on which you have been an editor. If you wish to comment, go to Talk:List of African-American firsts. --Tenebrae (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As far as I know I have never edited this article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Peer review exchange
Hi Cwmhiraeth, like what you have done with frog. I am a herpetologist and willing to peer-review your article, but was hoping for a trade in the deal. Would you be willing to come and peer-review ecology? I have been working on the ecology article for a long-time and you seem like the right person for the job. I'll review frog anyway, but wanted to draw you to ecology since it seems to be in your area of interest anyway. Thanks.Thompsma (talk) 18:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will have a go at peer reviewing Ecology. As you say, this is certainly a subject that interests me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Cwmhiraeth! I might come across as being harsh in my peer review comments. Please do not take any of it personally. I know I used to hate getting critical feedback, yet I know that I give very harsh and pointed feedback. Feel free to call me out if you think I am wrong, because often times I can be. It is just my writing style and it puts some people off. I'll do my best, however, to help out as much as I can and hopefully my tough review will make the FA simple.Thompsma (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh...I'm moving this week and all my herpetology textbooks are in boxes. I might be away for a week or two as I move and unpack. I have a full and complete collection of herpetology texts (over 1000 books) - I collect them. So I can use these resources to give you any information you need if you can't access a book or citation.Thompsma (talk) 06:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I will work on the points you raise in the review and see if I can find some time in between to look at Ecology! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Don't give up on ecology, you are doing a great job.Thompsma (talk) 05:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification
Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the wikify template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify

DYK for Agelas schmidti
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Parazoanthus swiftii
Orlady (talk) 16:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Iotrochota birotulata
Orlady (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Tree
Hi Cwmhiraeth,

I too was puzzled by the extremely negative reaction to your rewrite of the Tree article, but I think I now have some advice: smaller edits, rather than a lot of work in your userspace seems to be best for an article like that one, that has high importance and has been entrenched for a long time, so people get very touchy about changes to it. Of course, an edit has to be big enough to make a point completely, but I think that is the key, divide them up by concept and use a very thorough edit description. Waiting for a couple of days before making the next edit also gives you a chance to step away for your own protection if there is a volley of insults. I've very sorry that this has happened to you. Best wishes, Sminthopsis84 (talk) 17:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I had been wondering if that was the problem and will know not to proceed in the same way another time. There was a particular reason for treating the article in that way which was that I wanted to enter it for the Core contest, which runs through August, and did not want to start improving the article before the end of July. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The edit I made today in tree and that you reversed was made because I came across these sentences in the Coevolution section of the article Ecology which I was helping to peer review:
 * "Indirect mutualisms occur where the organisms live apart. For example, trees living in the equatorial regions of the planet supply oxygen into the atmosphere that sustains species living in distant polar regions of the planet. This relationship is called commensalism because many others receive the benefits of clean air at no cost or harm to trees supplying the oxygen." It was referenced to that journal article so I did likewise even though the abstract did not look promising. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah yes. I've substituted some citations on the Ecology page, unfortunately not particularly accessible ones, but authoritative and about the topic under discussion.
 * Thank you for explaining about the Core Contest, I'll take that as a sort of warning to stay away from those. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry that I'm taking so long to look at this question properly, the time I have available for wikipedia gets used up rapidly by my watch list. However, the versions are all still there, so over the next month or two perhaps we can slowly build something that satisfies all. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Neofibularia nolitangere
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Haplosyllis spongicola
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Tree
Hi Cwmhiraeth, I'm sorry that the Tree edits are getting so rough on you. It is a touchy subject with anyone who has ever tried to teach biology. A real bang-head-on-laboratory-bench frustration sets in when one is grading student essays, and these facts that we consider so basic get mangled in so many different ways (like the "Meiosis produces a tetrad of microspores that develop into a pollen grain" from this web site which should have said "each of which develops into a pollen grain". Fixing errors is very difficult editing, and I'm afraid that you work too fast for me, I can't keep up. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 19:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Well it was a pity that I chose that source because I see now that it was unreliable. So I rewrote the section on gymnosperm reproduction this morning from a University source. I am trying my best to improve the article and think having the whole section blanked is very destructive and unhelpful. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * As a botanist who learned his botany nearly 50 years ago, you have my support. I don't take too kindly to the pedagogic style of editing that has emerged lately. We all make mistakes or are putting forward long outdated concepts (in my case anyway) - but to be met with sarcasm and blanking is no way to improve an article. I have been around on Wikipedia for more than 7 years and will probably still be here in another 7, still learning, still making some mistakes but hopefully still contributing constructively and improving articles. I fully expect my tenacity will outlive the tantrums of the newly come zealots ! Hwyl fawr.  Velella  Velella Talk 20:29, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * If you haven't taught lately, I think you would be amazed by the speed and tenacity with which students suck up and regurgitate material from wikipedia, and how difficult it is to persuade them that what they have "studied" is nonsense. So I agree with EauOo that it is far better to have a blank than to have misinformation. Anything that has been removed is still very accessible from the history of the page. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * When I wrote the rewrite I thought I was writing on a general topic, a tree, not a specialised botanical topic. The previous version was poor and if I had worked around it and just added further information on uses etc. it would have been better. I do also feel disappointed in the quality of the sources I used as I can see now that the information I derived from the book that I ueed for guidance, The World Encyclopedia of Trees by Tony Russell and Catherine Cuttler, has led me astray. For example, having talked about conifers and broad-leafed trees early on, it then went on to deal with the structure of the roots, trunk and leaves with no further reference to conifers being different from angiosperms. Other editors kept saying how wrong the article was but were unspecific about its faults which rendered it difficult for me to remove them. I enjoyed writing the article at the time but have not enjoyed the aftermath! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, there's a lot of dumbed-down-until-it's-wrong material on the Web that is quite distressing. If I wrote "mammals have fins" there'd surely be no shortage of people ready to correct it, but statements equivalent to "trees have flowers" or "grasses bloom in June" are so common in wikipedia that the few of us who work on these problems can't cope and consequently are rather touchy. The citation that I just added to lenticel seems to be an exceptional online botany site with enough detail to be good, though I've only looked at the one page.
 * I did my best yesterday, but spent more time than I could afford and have other work that needs to be done, so I'm going to step away from Tree now. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Amphibian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to RDNA


 * Frog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to RDNA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Frog FA review
Hi Cwmhiraeth...Just got your message. I would hold off on the FA review for a couple more weeks. I would say that it is definitely not ready. I've nominated a few articles for FA review and had them in better shape that frog is and they were shut down right away. I'm working all this week for a huge contract and will be out in the field most of the time. I will be popping in now and again, but might be too tired to help out. If you give me a couple of weeks and hold off I can help you get it up to par. There's still much to be done. Will check in when I get back from work. Take care.Thompsma (talk) 04:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

GOCE news and September drive invitation
Thank you indeed for the Bio-star. I guess there are a number of editors who would say I didn't deserve it with regards to Tree. And by the way, my botany dates from the same period as yours. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Common toad
Out of curiosity, do you still plan to bring the the common toad article to FA? LittleJerry (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Not really. I thought it might be too difficult to make it comprehensive enough and I thought the sub-species issue was difficult. What do you think?
 * I am working on Frog instead with FAC in mind. It is currently in Peer review here if you have any comments. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:26, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that all you need to do is get rid of those low-qaulity sources. It seems comprehensive enough. Are there major things you think you've missed? LittleJerry (talk) 19:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You are a very good persuader. I will give it a go! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:10, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Good luck!! LittleJerry (talk) 20:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Common toad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Anorexia and Basque Country


 * Amphibian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Extant


 * Milicia regia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Petiole


 * Rhabdias bufonis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Anorexia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Milicia regia
Hello! Your submission of Milicia regia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pumpkin Sky  talk  20:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Pteria colymbus
Hello! Your submission of Pteria colymbus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Smallman12q (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Salientia
Yngvadottir (talk) 00:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pteria colymbus
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Black Mountain Salamander
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 August newsletter
The final is upon us! We are down to our final 8. A massive 573 was our lowest qualifying score; this is higher than the 150 points needed last year and the 430 needed in 2010. Even in 2009, when points were acquired for mainspace edit count in addition to audited content, 417 points secured a place. That leaves this year's WikiCup, by one measure at least, our most competitive ever. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:
 * 1) once again finishes the round in first place, leading Pool B. Grapple X writes articles about television, and especially The X-Files and Millenium, with good articles making up the bulk of the score.
 * 2) led Pool A this round. Fourth-place finalist last year, Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, and has reached the final primarily off the back of his massive number of did you knows.
 * 3) was second in Pool B. Ruby2010 writes primarily on television and film, and scores primarily from good articles.
 * 4) finished third in Pool B. Casliber is something of a WikiCup veteran, having finished sixth in 2011 and fourth in 2010. Casliber writes on the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. Over half of Casliber's points this round were bonus points from the high-importance articles he has worked on.
 * 5) came second in Pool A. Also writing on biology, especially marine biology, Cwmhiraeth received 390 points for one featured article (Bivalvia) and one good article (pelican), topping up with a large number of did you knows.
 * 6) was third in Pool A. Muboshgu writes primarily on baseball, and this round saw Muboshgu's first featured article, Derek Jeter, promoted on its fourth attempt at FAC.
 * 7) was fourth in Pool A. She writes on a variety of topics, including horses, but this round also saw the high-importance lettuce reach featured article status.
 * 8) is another WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist in 2009 and 2010. He writes mostly on mycology.

However, we must also say goodbye to the eight who did not make the final, having fallen at the last hurdle:, , , , , , and. We hope to see you all next year.

On the subject of next year, a discussion has been opened here. Come and have your say about the competition, and how you'd like it to run in the future. This brainstorming will go on for some time before more focused discussions/polls are opened. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/ Lecythis ollaria at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lecythis ollaria
Orlady (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Bufo eichwaldi
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Milicia regia
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Questions re DYK nomination for Lecythis ampla
Hello! Your submission of Lecythis ampla at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —David Eppstein (talk) 01:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/ Davidaster rubiginosus, Davidaster discoideus at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Rhabdias bufonis
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nannophrys ceylonensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulnerable (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Clouded salamander
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Wandering Salamander
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Mexican burrowing caecilian
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Our Greatest Team Parade
Could your re-review the article as I've had to change a couple of things after looking at a new official source? Simply south...... eating shoes for just 6 years 17:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Black Salamander
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Danube bleak
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nannophrys ceylonensis
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nannophrys marmorata
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Common toad
You have done a good job so far, but you just don't get a few things that are fundamental to writing the article.I will write what I can next week, and I asked for help at the wikiproject. Eau (talk) 09:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I had a look at what you wrote at the WikiProject and the sort of help you mention there would be most welcome. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Good.

You have done a great job on the article and trying to work with people, if no one from amphibians can help, I will finish it up, still gotta wait at least a week. Take care. Eau (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

&amp;#8209;
Hi. I just replied on my talk. MOS:ENDASH is long-term stable guidance with wide support. If you've used &amp;#8209; in other articles, it's an easy fix. I'll help, if you like. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 11:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

A pie for you!

 * Well, thanks. I'll enjoy that! I hope to get Amphibian at least as far as GA. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 15:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Davidaster rubiginosus
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Davidaster discoideus
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your spam whitelist request
Hi, this is to let you know that your request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist has now been processed and will soon be closed and archived. To find the request, search for your username at that page. Stifle (talk) 17:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Heteromysis actiniae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Brood pouch


 * Kessler's Gudgeon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Substrate


 * Ouachita Dusky Salamander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Rich Mountain


 * Spotted cleaner shrimp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Chela

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ichthyophis glutinosus
Yngvadottir (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Frog
Hi Cwmhiraeth...Got your message. My internet is going to be hooked up tomorrow. There were a few cancellations. I just moved and started a new job. However, next week I will have time. My books are unpacked and I have a large reference section on herpetology and frogs in general. Next week I will plunge into the article and will assist to get it up to FA status. At this point I am absolutely certain that it will be quickly knocked down in a FA review - I have experience from other articles. I realize you want to enter into the WikiCup and would like me as a co-nominator, but at this point in time I do not think the article is ready. Sorry for being a nay-sayer at this point in time, but it will get there and I will be able to help. I just quickly popped in here to let you know. Take care.Thompsma (talk) 18:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will be patient. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ouachita Dusky Salamander
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Fourche Mountain Salamander
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Rich Mountain Salamander
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nostoc commune
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Sandgrouse
Hi, I've now passed the article. I assume the GA logo is added automatically? I noticed one more thing that might be nice to briefly mention in the article under relations with humans (but isn't essential to the GA status at all), which is that a subspecies of the Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse appears to be extinct. Maybe briefly explain why, as it is most certainly human related? FunkMonk (talk) 08:42, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will investigate what you say about the Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse subspecies.
 * It tells you what you need to do when you pass an article under the section "Pass" on the GA page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. And by a fun coincidence, I just noticed that one of the "best" contemporary depictions of the Dodo (which I'm working on) also shows two Painted Sandgrouse in the lower right! FunkMonk (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Reference clutter in Bivalvia
Please see the above; an editor tried to take a machete to some of the references as "clutter". Br'er Rabbit (talk) 19:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * User talk:Br'er Rabbit


 * is disruptively editing. He has again tried to machete the citation templates and someone else reverted him this time. I reverted two edits that cut sourced information. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 22:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Common toad
I'm happy with the taxonomy, and I've already supported, not sure what you are asking me to do?  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  09:02, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pinna carnea
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lytechinus variegatus
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lytechinus williamsi
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Lecythis ampla
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Ixalotriton niger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Trunk and Category


 * Pseudoeurycea praecellens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Cordoba and Jalapa


 * Carpathian brook lamprey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Timis


 * Chthonerpeton indistinctum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Migration


 * Inga thibaudiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Calyx

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Brownea grandiceps
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Inga thibaudiana
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

2010 proposed taxonomy of the Bivalvia
Thank you for posting this important information to Wikipedia. A suggestion and a question:

It might be good to create a bridge page, or change the title to something beginning with "bivalvia" or "taxonomy, so that it will come up when someone types those words into the search box. The viewer statistics are dismal as it is now.

My question: The family sphaeriidae or pisidiidae (the little freshwater "fingernail" and "pill" clams) is not included in the listing. They are classified with the Corbiculacea in some older classifications. Were they left out of the Proposed Taxonomy? Also, would you be OK if some day I recast the listings to a tabulated form? Martino3 (talk) 03:35, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The article 2010 proposed taxonomy of the Bivalvia was separated from the main Bivalvia article. I was not responsible for its original contents but any alterations would need to be appropriately sourced. I have no objection to the article's name being changed or you tabulating the information. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Oreaster reticulatus
Yngvadottir (talk) 08:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Diploria clivosa
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Diploria strigosa
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Chthonerpeton indistinctum
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Typhlonectes compressicauda
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Kessler's Gudgeon
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Danube Gudgeon
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Heteromysis actiniae
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Bartholomea annulata
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ancylomenes pedersoni
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Spotted cleaner shrimp
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Elacatinus chancei
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Elacatinus horsti
The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Fayum Sandgrouse
There's an entry for the extinct sandgrouse subspecies in the book Extinct Birds from 2012. It says 10 specimens were last seen in 1979, but that it is unknown why they went extinct. FunkMonk (talk) 11:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I see you have added the information to the articles. I have since added your nice image with the dodo to Painted Sandgrouse. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nectophrynoides viviparus
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nectophrynoides laevis
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Echinometra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Urchin


 * Nectophrynoides laevis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Tympanum


 * Nectophrynoides viviparus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Vulnerable


 * Orthasterias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Knoll


 * Pteraster tesselatus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mucous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Agathis atropurpurea
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Common toad
I see Common Toad has been promoted to FA, and, although I did not follow the edits, I saw that you had a good group of editors working on it from WikiProject Amphibian. Go forth and cookie them or something! I will be in the field almost continually for the next month, unexpectedly, so I was no help, but I feel more comfortable with dedicated amphibian editors doing the editing. Great choice of subject for FA. Eau (talk) 02:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help during the FA process. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you for doing such a thorough review! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Caspian lamprey
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Carpathian brook lamprey
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar
I hope you'll do more. Is starfish on your radar? LittleJerry (talk) 01:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I couldn't have done it without the help of others. Starfish is trying for GA. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I've been thinking of bringing some invertebrate (like octopus or scorpion) to FA status in the near future (likely spring 2013). Would you be interested in a collaboration? LittleJerry (talk) 01:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I would be glad to collaborate on one of those or something similar, but not before the end of October. For the moment I am concentrating my efforts on articles that can earn me points in my WikiCup bid. Talking of which, I have put Frog up for FA but so far there has been little response. Would you care to do a spotcheck as you did in the Common toad FAC? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I plan on getting two more mammal articles to FA before considering invertebrates. As for spotchecking. I don't think I'll need you since your not due for that for six months. LittleJerry (talk) 15:41, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Solaster dawsoni
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Stylasterias
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Orthasterias
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pteraster tesselatus
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Article
Hello! Your submission of Article at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yazan (talk) 07:25, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ahnfeltia plicata
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Cordylecladia erecta
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Luidia foliolata
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

FAC
You're not supposed to have two FAC nominations at the same time. (Good luck with "Amphibian".) Axl  ¤  [Talk]  10:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I can if one is a joint nomination, and Frog is. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes, you're right. :-) Axl  ¤  [Talk]  10:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I looked through the contribution history of frog, and it does not seem to me that Mark's input warrants a co-nom on the frog article. I understand he gave some of his valuable expertise at the peer review, but it looks like you're adding his name to be able to put up two candidates at FAC. If you disagree with my assessment, would you mind then if I worked on either the amphibian or the frog article for a few days myself and add myself to the FAC? Sasata (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I have now withdrawn the Amphibian FAC due to concerns as to whether I was contravening the FAC rules as my co-nominator in the Frog FAC might have been insufficiently involved in that article. I'll try again later. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Colostethus stepheni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Amazon


 * Ocoee Salamander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Tallulah

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 September newsletter


We're over half way through the final, and so it is less than a month until we know for certain our 2012 WikiCup champion. currently leads, followed by, and. However, we have no one resembling a breakaway leader, and so the competition is a long way from over. Next month's newsletter will feature a list of our winners (who are not necessarily only the finalists) and keep your eyes open for an article on the WikiCup in a future edition of The Signpost. The leaders are already on a par with last year's winners, but a long way from the huge scores seen in 2010. That said, a repeat of the competition from 2010 seems unlikely.

It is good to see that three-quarters of our finalists have already scored bonus points this round. This shows that, contrary to criticism that the WikiCup has received in the past, the competition does not merely incentivise the writing of trivial articles; instead, our top competitors are still spending their time contributing to high-importance articles, and bringing them to a high standard. This does a great service to the encyclopedia and its readers. Thank you, and good work!

The planning for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Some straw polls have been opened concerning the scoring, and you can now sign up for next year's competition. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK multiple nomination hook is too long
Ixalotriton niger, Ixalotriton parva, Pseudoeurycea praecellens, Thorius pennatulus, Pseudoeurycea smithi, The hook is 219 characters. Can you shorten it up, please?, Maile66 (talk) 12:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * In multiple hooks there is an allowance for greater length, see supplementary rule C3. Mikenorton (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have proposed a slightly shorter hook anyway. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Echinometra viridis
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Echinometra lucunter
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Echinometra mathaei
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Leptasterias polaris
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Leptasterias tenera
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Common rocket frog
Hi there, I've reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Common rocket frog, Colostethus stepheni and found one minor issue that should be easy to fix. Once completed, could you drop me a note there to say it's done and I'll happy come along and give it a green tick. Thanks, Miyagawa   (talk)  12:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Saccharum officinarum
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Saccharum barberi
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Saccharum edule
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ixalotriton niger
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ixalotriton parva
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pseudoeurycea praecellens
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Thorius pennatulus
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pseudoeurycea smithi
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Cumberland Dusky Salamander
Casliber (talk) 08:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ocoee Salamander
Casliber (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ophiothrix suensoni
Casliber (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Haliclona compressa
Casliber (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)