User talk:Cwn-news

Welcome!
Hello, Cwn-news, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Cwn-news, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 01:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Cwn-news


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Cwn-news, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 01:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your wrong PhilKnight. You cannot override federal law. Freedom of speech is as is for any website. Good luck trying to override it. Because I know cases like this that lost in court. And people like me, won in court. You won't be winning and I am not threating it: I promise you that. I'm done with you PhilKnight. I will only speak to the CEO of Wikipedia now.

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Cwn-news (talk) 01:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC) I'm not promoting. I was only talking about CWN. Big difference. I will keep on putting it up until you give up. You let CNN, Foxnews and other orgs do it. So, it does work like a two-way street. You need to let me also. I've already spoke to my attorney about this before I posted this. We reviewed the guidelines; how I worded it was not breaking your guidelines. You just limited my: 1st amendment rights which is considered a felony for Wikipedia.


 * CNN does not have an editor creating an article in their name; its article is written about other users. Also, please review WP:No legal threats and retract your comment above accordingly. —C.Fred (talk) 02:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. —C.Fred (talk) 02:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

If you're going by the rules, then you know that you may not edit Wikipedia while you have pending legal action against it or when you have made a comment that indicates your intention or contemplation of taking legal action. That would also include accusing WMF and/or editors of committing a crime—and you have done that this evening as well. I can provide diffs if you like. —C.Fred (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes I can edit my comments Mr. Fred since you block me. You can't limit my freedom of speech by federal law. Your policies isn't the law. Nice try. You know what you did was in the wrong. Again I'm not threating. You took it the wrong way and I will prove that with the Founder and CEO by email. I'm done with you. I will let your boss override your block now. And that is not a threat!


 * You have no freedom of speech on Wikipedia. It's a private website, so freedom of speech doesn't apply. PhilKnight (talk) 03:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Indeed. The 1st Amendment only prohibits Government from preventing free speech, and provides no rights whatsoever to free speech in any private setting. (And I'm surprised by how many Americans don't appear to understand that - your 1st Amendment was a remarkable achievement, and you really should learn about it before you try to invoke it.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your username
Should you retract your threat of legal action, there is still the problem of your disallowed username, which will need to be addressed before you can be unblocked. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, this username can not be used. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you use. You can request a change of username by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

I will only cease the legal action if you allow me to have my page. I did nothing wrong at all. And you guys know it. Legally people can sue people or website and retaliation like you did legally cannot happen. You blocking due to "legal actions" is retaliation and any attorney will tell you that. Heck even the DOJ will tell you that. Doesn't matter if you're a private company or not. The US Supreme Court already ruled that you can't do what you did long time ago. I'm overriding your ruling due to the federal laws which you can't override. I'm making me another account and opening a page. Same wording same everything.


 * As was expressed before, Wikipedia is a private website and is allowed to set up its own rules of conduct. One of those is the WP:No legal threats policy. Only after you withdraw your threats can we begin to discuss what you need to do to show that Cwn-news is a notable subject and warrants an article.


 * If you were to create a new account and set up the same page, you would be in violation of the policy against abuse of multiple accounts. That violation would result in the immediate blocking of your new account. —C.Fred (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Another made up rule? Look Fred, I said last night that I'm done talking with you. That is my legal right to say that. If you keep on talking to me, I can legally file harassment. Look, you know that you was in the wrong on the block. Wikipedia cannot override federal law. Your policy cannot override federal law. Your policy isn't the law and the United States Supreme Court ruled that already on other cases similar to this. I know the law, but it looks like you don't know the law. How is your failed research working for you? I don't think it's working today for you. That's ok, I will ban you from my sites also. Works like a 2-way street! Also I will ban you from my social media pages. Works like a 2-way street. I'm done with you and that is final! I'm making me another account and I know legally, you cannot ban me on that. You will be in direct violation of federal laws and Wikipedia cannot override federal laws. Even Wikipedia attorneys will tell you that. if you take Donations, guess what; you work for the people that you accept donations from. That means the people that donates the money is the boss legally. Something to think about before banning companies. I'm done but I won legally! It's not a threat. It's a promise and that is way different then a threat that you claimed that I did. I think you need to research the meaning of threat and promises. Different meanings! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwn-news (talk • contribs) 21:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * As you are continuing to make legal threats here, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. If you wish to appeal further, please see WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:16, 12 February 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 23:16, 12 February 2017 (UTC)