User talk:Cwong2275

Nomination of Keith Chambers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keith Chambers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Keith Chambers& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DannyS712 (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

We?
In this edit summary you note that "we removed some references". Who is "we"? A Wikipedia account should not be shared, but should represent a single individual. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:40, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, that was just a figure of speech. I'll be sure to use "I" for any future notes.

Copied content
Wikipedia cannot and will not accept copyrighted content copied from elsewhere. Only content that is in the public domain, or has been released by the copyright owner under a CC-BY-SA license or a compatible free license may be copied, and even those must be properly attributed, and may not be suitable. See Copyrights for more information.

Brief quotations may be used if they are properly attributed, marked as quotations, and cited to a reliable source. See Quotation for more details on this.

Keith Chambers was tagged as a copyright violation. I confirmed that it was a copy, and deleted it accordingly.

Please in future do not copy content from other websites to insert into Wikipedia. Facts must be supported by reliable sources, but article content must be written in your own original words. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

I had revised some of the text and would have appreciated some feedback other than "I confirmed that it was a copy, and deleted it accordingly." Please restore the page and let me edit it to conform to Wikipedia's regulations. Cwong2275 (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC)cwong2275
 * , Wikipedia can't have copyrighted text on it at any point, whether you plan on rewriting it or not. That's a hard rule, not one of the more negotiable guidelines. You'd have to rewrite it completely before you post it here. We don't want to be sued for copyright infringement, or have any reason for lawsuits to even be a possibility — so text must be completely your own work or else licensed under a compatible licence, and it can't be overly positive or negative. As a side note, can you confirm whether you are the photographer for the photos you've uploaded to Commons? Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)