User talk:Cxw1044

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Replaceable fair use File:UMass Memorial Ambulatory Care Center.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:UMass Memorial Ambulatory Care Center.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Fut.Perf - thank you for the message. That is very helpful.  The image is of an architectural piece of work with permission to use by the designers. I believe architecture is a form of art and the artistry must be adequately captured in photographs of the building.  This photograph was taken by the architectural artist and beautifully complements their work on the architectural piece.  As such, although I could (and have) taken photos of the subject myself, I chose to add this photo as it is effectively not replaceable. A snapshot may be free but it would not adequately capture the architectural work as intended.
 * Would you agree with this explanation?
 * If not, I could circle back to the designers and ask whether they would release under free license, although I'm sure as artists they would prefer to have their work properly credited.

Cxw1044 (talk) 22:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * In terms of copyright, an architectural work may indeed be a creative work, but according to US law, photographs of it can still be taken freely by anybody and independently of its copyright. If this is possible, we must use that possibility, according to our own non-free content rules. Whether or not such a replacement is qualitatively adequate is purely a matter of the quality of the photographer's work – nobody could reasonably argue that no replacement photograph could ever adequately capture this, so non-replaceability is not an issue. If you can get the creators of the present photo to release it under a free license, that would of course also work (and you can assure them that even under a free license, they would still be entitled to proper credits too.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * FutPerf - I think I may have been unclear. I agree that you can certainly freely take photographs of buildings in public places. I was, however, suggesting that this photograph with its additional artistic merits best represents the creative work as the original artist intended. Although a replacement photograph is theoretically possible, as far as I know, it is currently not available. I would submit that until such time as it is, the present photograph is effectively not directly replaceable. I will, nonetheless, ask whether the artist is happy with a free license.  Cxw1044 (talk) 10:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Memorial Hospital Worcester MA Historic.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Memorial Hospital Worcester MA Historic.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

License
Assuming the image was published in the United States, I would use the license tag PD-1923 on that image. Kelly hi! 12:29, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RobinsonLecture2004.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RobinsonLecture2004.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion pending for File:RobinsonLecture2004.jpg
Hello, Cxw1044. Some time ago, a file you uploaded &mdash; File:RobinsonLecture2004.jpg &mdash; was tagged with OTRS pending, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.


 * If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.


 * If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Memorial Hospital Worcester MA Historic.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Memorial Hospital Worcester MA Historic.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 11:26, 15 June 2015 (UTC)