User talk:CyberGhostfarce

Image copyright problem with Image:ScotchBlogScreenshot.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:ScotchBlogScreenshot.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Making apparently malicious sockpuppetry claims with no evidence whatseover; the only reason I haven't yet blocked this as a trolling account is to give you the chance to explain what's possibly an honest mistake. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  13:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If you did your research, you would see that my claims of sockpuppetry against that user have merit. There is no "personal attack" involved here, simply an assertion that I believe that another editor is using sock puppets. By checking your prior contributions, I see that you have had prior interaction with the accused sock puppeteer. I feel that this disqualifies you from making a judgment about my claim, as I question your neutrality. Additionally, by making accusations about me such as you have, I believe that you are in violation of wikipedia's civility policy for threatening to block me simply because I opened a sock puppety claim against another editor. CyberGhostfarce 10:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ScotchBlogScreenshot.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:ScotchBlogScreenshot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:KevinErskineBook.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KevinErskineBook.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)