User talk:CyberTea1977

Welcome!
Hello, AndreKerr, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  01:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of André Kërr


The page André Kërr has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanCherek (talk) 01:32, 15 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Note what G4 clearly states: "It excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version." The page is mostly different from what it was before, without extrapolating facts from the sources, and the sources provide notability. Its style is in line with other pages in the same category of Hinduism. There should not be persecution towards a page on a topic, but rather an openness for it to improve. It was mistakenly perceived as self-promotion due to the incorrect use of a nickname, which has already been clarified. Therefore, I don't see a reason to keep targeting this article. CyberTea1977 (talk) 16:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines, as you did at André Kërr. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. DanCherek (talk) 01:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The sources hold a notable status in Brazil. UOL, an important portal, stands out as one of them. ABAV, a non-profit organization, specializes in this particular subject, primarily within the Brazilian context. Lastly, WeMystic represents a domain of high authority in spiritual themes. In total, there are three excellent sources available. One of the sources, in fact, addresses the topic specifically, not just briefly mentioning it. It is not a personal website of the author; it is literally an non-profit organization that also references other notable individuals within the same line of work. There is a socio-cultural context that was overlooked during the voting process, known as the "complexo de vira-lata" (mongrel complex), as it was a Brazilian individual who decided to target the article's author, who has a humble background. Certainly, the article will be similar, but not identical, as it reflects the truth of the topic as cited in the sources. What makes more sense is to leave the article open for the community to make their changes and improvements. The votes were based on the allegations made by the individual in question and were simply accepted as facts without rational judgment, exhibiting a thoughtless herd mentality. CyberTea1977 (talk) 16:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you have an issue with the way the AFD is closed, deletion review is thataway. DanCherek (talk) 16:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)