User talk:Cyberpower678/spam-exception.js/Archives/2014/February

{{notice

Examiner
Last September, Cyberbot II tagged Frenchman's Tower as having a blacklisted link. The link is a reference supporting a statement in the article that the tower has attracted vandals and the curious. The referenced web site contains advertising, but is not otherwise abusive, as far as I can tell.

//www.examiner.com/tourism-in-san-jose/the-mystery-of-frenchman-s-tower

Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

Wikfr (talk) 21:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You will need to request whitelisting on MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist.— cyberpower ChatAbsent 22:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I changed my mind, after linking to the article, and finding the site full of tricks that drastically slowed my browser. I will change the url to a comment, that will document the reference, but can't be clicked on.  Thanks Cyberbot.  Wikfr (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I have had a brief look at:

h t t p : / / w w w. a n d t a n. n e w m a i l. r u / l i s t /

I don't see any problem with this site. It isn't spam. I hasn't done anything to my Mac system that I'm aware of.

Idiots. How can I tell you a site is not bad if you refuse to accept the URL.

Furthermore, if this is not the appropriate place to address this report, why does your system direct me to this place?
 * Actually it should be directing you to MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist— cyberpower Absent Be my Valentine 06:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)