User talk:Cybertrend

AMA request
Hello, I'm Steve Caruso from the Association of Members' Advocates. I'm sorry to hear about your difficulties. I'm writing to inform you that we have recieved your request, and that we are currently in the process of finding you a suitable Advocate. You should be hearing from us soon. In the meantime, be sure to read through the AMA pages here at Wikipedia to get more aquainted with the process of Advocacy and what to expect. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page. :-) אמר Steve Caruso ( desk / AMA / vote for me ) 01:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: your message on my talk page
You accuse me of not having any personal knowledge of Mr. Paul. Do you? What is that personal knowledge?

I am writing a book on the Rise and Fall of Stan Lee Media, the company Paul founded with Spider Man creator Stan Lee. I have studied all court documents from Paul's securities prosecution, his anti-Castro activities and charges, including the Cuban Coffee Caper and his drug possession charges from 1979. I interviewed key witnesses from the government and business community, regarding Paul dating back to his career as an international lawyer in Miami and his work with government agencies. I have no agenda other than to ensure that facts are not distorted by malevolent acolytes of the Clintons who get their entire education from mainstream media news outlets that have consistently misrepresented whistleblowers and the conduct of the Clintons. You have engaged in a long term systematic campaign to falsely malign both sources that have been quoted and facts that you have challenged without any personal knowledge on your part.

Hello from an Advocate
Hello Cybertrend. My name is Royalguard11 and I have been asked to help you with your current troubles. I have looked over the Peter Paul and Peter F. Paul talk pages. From what I can see, you believe that Peter F. Paul was a figure in uncovering fraud in a Hillery Clinton campain, and User:Uucp believes that he is nothing more than a drug dealer. You accuse Uucp of protecting the Clintons, and he accuses you of being a Peter Paul spokesperson. Am I correct, or is there more I have missed? I will watch this page for your responce, or you can respond on my desk, or you may email me using the e-mail this user function on my userpage. Hope to hear from you soon. -Royalguard11Talk 04:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Response from Cybertrend
I left a message on your desk. Uucp is also vandalizing a related linked page, Gala Hollywood Farewell Salute to President Clinton and removing factual information, related links in order to once again distort the facts. This event, known as Event 39 to the FEC was the cenetrpiece of the first ever trial of a Senator's finance director for election law fraud, and it was the centerpiece of the FEC admission by Hillary's treasurer that false FEC reports were filed that hid Paul's contributions. uucp should not be allowed to continue without limit his efforts to hide the facts from wikipedia. Talk 13:46, 14 August 2006 (EST)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Cybertrend for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Uucp 14:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)