User talk:Cyclonebiskit/Archive18

The Signpost: 9 June 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Precious five years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Bret track
This may seem like a straightforward and/or dumb question, but when you make the track for Bret, can you just start it from when NHC initiated advisories on it as a potential tropical cyclone? --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 00:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * For consistency I'm just using whatever they place in the ATCF track. It'll almost certainly be shortened in post-storm analysis. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 00:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I would just put up the track with the ATCF data you said just so it's done (and possibly saved for later uses) :P --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 01:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Page move thing
Do you mind moving this draft of TS Bret me and some other members of WPTC have worked on to the mainspace? It looks as detailed as I (and the others) could possibly make it. Also I would've asked Hink but he seems to be away or something so I've come to ask you instead :P --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 20:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I've moved the page into the mainspace. Also marked the flooding image as speedy delete on the commons as there's no indication it is not copyrighted. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 00:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Joaquin Bahamas track
Please update the File:Joaquin 2015 Bahamas track.png with the best track, thanks. --219.79.127.186 (talk) 09:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter
The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Matthew Florida effects
Are you planning at some point to finish the draft you made on the effects of Matthew in Florida? You seemed to have abandoned it after late March and the last edit on there was by an IP on 7 April. Would love to see it finished so it can go live. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 23:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

FLC review trade
Hi, I have the other video game-related FLC currently up on the list, a few below yours (List of Enix games) - would you like to trade reviews? -- Pres N  17:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a fair deal to me! ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 13:49, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Saladin1987
Hi, Cyclonebiskit. You blocked this user for making constant disruptive edits back in 2015. , who dealt with him in 2016, will be off for a few days. Unfortunately, literally about every single edit this user makes, falls under the definition of pure disruption. The only reason why "Saladin1987" has managed to jump the gun so often, is because he edits irregularly, and with many of the targeted articles being low-profile ones.

I'm convinced that another topic ban won't be able to fix this issue. When he got topic banned in September 2016, he just "waited" for the months to expire (March/April 2017), and then just went at it again, straight ahead. Unfortunately, being disruptive, is something that is very deeply embedded in the user's editorial pattern, and I'm afraid that its the only conclusion that one can form here. Basic examples of the past few weeks;
 * Changes "Turkmen" into "Azerbaijani" without providing a source, and using a fake edit summary
 * Changes Turkmen into Turkic without any reason, even though the source literally states "Turkmen".
 * Removes "ethnic Turkmen people" category for no reason.
 * More disruptive, unsourced and unreasoned editing.
 * Here he removes references to actor being of Pashtun ancestry, even though there is a source in the article ("The son of Zakira Khan, a Pathan from the North-West Frontier Province....")
 * Here, he removes Pashto, even though it's a sourced statement.
 * Here he gives no reason in the edit summary for changing "Afghanistan" to "Kabul". The source of the photo says "Findplace: Afghanistan/Gandhara".
 * Changing the word "Afghanistan" into "Pakistan".
 * More unsourced info.

And that's literally the tip of the iceberg. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Omais and 17W BT tracks
Hi, Cyclonebiskit and thanks for updating the 2016 typhoon tracks from the JTWC BT. I haven't seen the files yet from JTWC, though, JD updated that Omais was a cat1 typhoon and 17W was a TS. Could you update these too? Also the season summary track map, so we can fully finish up the 2016 season. Thanks so much and keep up the great work in TC tracks. Typhoon2013 (talk) 07:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

CPHC Rebest
Hi Cyclonebiskit, any news about the CPHC Rebest update into HURDAT? Sorry to bother you again about this question. ABC paulista (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

96W
I am sorry to say this. I am aware of 96W and its characteristics, but the basin does not recognise subtropical systems. Moreover, there is already a section about that system as JMA has monitored it for many days. Again, I feel sorry to say, but I need to revert what you added. 🐱💬 15:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If it's the same as 93W, that's fine to remove it and have it mentioned within the appropriate section. If it's a separate system, it warrants inclusion as an unofficial system. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 93W and 96W are exactly the same system as the JMA kept monitoring it during the period when the JTWC stopped monitoring, and advisories from JMA can prove that. It is just ironic that JTWC gave a new temporary designation when JMA declared it extratropical... Thus, it should be moved to the “Other storms” section. 🐱💬 17:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If it's the same system then it doesn't need mention anywhere else other than within 93W's section. Thanks for clarifying! ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:22, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

2017 Atlantic hurricane season summary map
I would Like to request that you please update File:2017 Atlantic hurricane season summary map.png that you created to include the full track of Hurricane Franklin.

Update : and the current track of TS Gert and full track of Gert when in Dissipates

WikiProject Investment
Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 16:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Satellite image of Hurricane Harvey in the news page
Recently you swapped the satellite image from the track image, okay? You put the 2230z, which i think is bad, badder than 2231z, which is more modern and better. Reason why i think 2230z is bad because it looks like a past storms on 1980 to 1990's while 2231z is good because it looks like a modern one as i said before. Could you please replace the 2230z with 2231z? Though 2231z is darker as i know i can say that i fear the most of other Wikipedia projects will be influenced by this image (2230z), even though this will appear for short time. I hope you'll change that. Anyways, thanks! --SMB99thx XD (contribs) 07:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The images convey the exact same information and there's no real need to swap them. The 2230z one works better for main page purposes since it's cropped closer to the storm and the features are more prominent. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 12:43, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Got it. I will try to prevent 2230z instances happening in future after this, despite that 2230z will appear in the main page for a while. I'll watch it on Wikimedia Commons to see how it goes.--SMB99thx XD (contribs) 12:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter
Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Four award nominations
Could I trouble you to take a squiz at the Four Award nominations? Hawkeye7  (talk)  04:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Irma
Do you mind moving my draft for Irma to mainspace? Considering it may be the worst the Northern Leeward Islands have seen since Luis 1995, it should be out there. MH is already halfway finished, up to the point where it first became a C3. Prep/impacts are also beginning to be worked on and main space would attract more editors to add stuff to this. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 02:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * done ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 03:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Prayers
Unsure why others haven't realized this yet, but wishing you the best of luck and thoughts and prayers since Irma appears to be making a beeline towards Florida... --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 23:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated man. Not looking good for my area, but hoping for the best. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Re
I think you went too far with your arguments, just counting it was 16:10, and there were some very oddish comments. Anyway, thanks for having the guts to make a decision. And maybe comment here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hurricane_Katrina_and_global_warming#Merger_proposal Cheers. prokaryotes (talk) 18:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Close at Hurricane Irma
Hi, Two thoughts. (A) Since you are involved at that talk page, I don't think you should have closed it. (B) FYI, as you may know, the bit about discretionary sanctions is sort of extra but not really enforceable. DS rules require, as a precondition for imposing such sanctions, a showing that one of the "awareness" criteria have been met. These criteria are listed at WP:Discretionary_sanctions. Although text on talk pages, like your reminder in the close statement, can be useful to help remind people, there is presently no recognition (at least in the written rules) that text on article talk pages can make an ed subject to DS. One of other criteria must be met. (C) Your close is overly broad, in my opinion, because its logic notes the tangential nature of the current text but you have threatened holy thunder about anyone trying to add Irma specific climate change discussion without clambering over the barred gates at the talk page first. We should be preventing problems and obstacles not making new ones. But life is short and I don't plan to pursue a formal challenge. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Maria
Do you mind moving my draft for Maria to mainspace? It'll be needed very soon tbh. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 21:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * There is already an older draft at Draft:Hurricane Maria (2017). Master of Time   ( talk ) 21:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh. Didn't realise :P I'll just merge whatever info I can in there. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 22:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Cyclonebiskit. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Pokémon – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 9. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Notice
Please rule here (merge, no merge, or move for new dedicated article) Also, users at related Irma and Harvey discussions suggested a dedicated article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hurricane_Katrina_and_global_warming#Merger_proposal prokaryotes (talk) 14:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Matthew in Florida article
Are you still going to finish the draft you started on the impacts of Matthew in Florida? You haven’t touched it in like 6 months and I think perhaps moving it to main space might help it get finished or so. Your call. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 18:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Bumping this about a week later. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 16:59, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Would appreciate a response soon imo but given your recent twitter update I'd understand if this takes longer. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 15:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry I keep forgetting to reply! I'm not really sure what I want to do with this article now. It's still severely lacking in multiple areas and incomplete... ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Huh. IMO you could either move it to draft space or main space - either one could and probably would speed up completion. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 16:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

"A Pacific Basin Sub-Tropical Cyclone off the Chilean Coast”in 2014/2015 South Pacific Tropical Cyclone Season.
Hello, I have been interested in the development of a sub-tropical cyclone system near Easter Islands off the Chilean Coast in 2014–15 South Pacific cyclone season. According to online information, it seems like you were going to submit an article titled “A Pacific Basin Sub-Tropical Cyclone off the Chilean Coast” to Nature. However, after searching in Google Scholar and Nature's site, it doesn't seems like the article have been indexed on those places. Was the article eventurally submitted under different name or to different place, and could you grant me access to the article? C933103 (talk) 10:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I think that there should be an article for this storm, given its unique nature (similar to 2006 Central Pacific cyclone and 1996 Lake Huron cyclone). Perhaps you should move it to draft space, and some other editors could come in and expand it, before moving it to mainspace. The system is notable enough, and there is research on the system out there.  Light and Dark2000  (talk) 04:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Maria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Hurricane_Maria check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Hurricane_Maria?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Question
Hi,

I left a question at the tropical cyclone portal but I am not sure that I wil get an answer I juge by the last item date. Maybe you can tell me or know a refence I can use. So here is my question:

In the tropical season articles, the begining of a tropical cyclone is when it becomes at least a Tropical depression (not counting the time of the tropical wave before). In the case of the end, I always was under the impression it was when it was declared post-tropical, not counting the further time as extra-tropical storm. In the case of Ophelia, the article set the end 3 days after the NHC has declared it post-tropical, counting the mid-latitude storm time. What was the reason for this?

Pierre cb (talk) 01:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Hurricane Flora GAR
Hurricane Flora, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.  Auree  ★ ★  07:30, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

1992 Pacific hurricane season summary map
I would like to request that you... Please update an another new File:1992 Pacific hurricane season summary map.png that you created to include the full track of that.



Update: Full tracks from storms and new summary map PNG-format. --FrancoLeymas (talk) 22:00, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results
The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:
 * First Place -
 * Second Place -
 * Third Place -

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
 * Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
 * Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
 * Featured List – and  both produced 2 FLs in R2
 * Featured Pictures – improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
 * Featured Topic – has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
 * Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
 * Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
 * In The News – had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
 * Good Article Review – completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - please send  an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. ,, and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

2017 Atlantic hurricane season summary map request
Can you remove the precursor points for the storms except the POTC ones? It makes it look cluttered especially with the long tracked invests that later became storms (like Gert). --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 16:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018
So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? , and. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Last cyclone updates
Hi, Cyclonebiskit. Just before the first cyclone develops for the upcoming cyclone season, would you be able to finally update the summary track maps for the 2016-17 SWio and AusR articles? Thanks. This is just to complete last season's tracks and to move on to the next. :) Typhoon2013  (talk) 09:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Otto and Irma images
Do you mind colorizing these images of Otto from last year on November 24 and Irma from this year on September 6 (both are at peak intensities)? Thanks. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 20:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know how to colorize images. I believe is the person to go to for that. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 14:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Oops I forgot that! :P Sorry I thought for a sec you did know. My bad! --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 16:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Numa track
Can you upload the track you made of Numa so I can add it to its page? --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 17:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I can't as it violates WP:OR. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh right...since it’s not confirmed it was actually tropical...whoops. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 17:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Cyclonebiskit, well then can you please let me upload the track maps for both Numa and 90M (last year)? I can label them as "Unofficial" and attribute the author to you, which would mitigate any Licensing issues on Commons (I only have the annotated track maps, though ;)). They really help in depicting the storm paths, and we already have a few of these "unofficial" storm track on Commons. Of course, if did obtain the track data from another agency or source, then it really wouldn't be OR, just "unofficial." Actually, your track isn't entirely OR. Your storm track is nearly identical to one in a diagram on this page, though it seems that researchers have yet to release specific track points for this storm (probably 'cause no one has written a report for Numa yet).  Light and Dark2000  (talk) 02:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * BTW, the NOAA called it a "hybrid" (between being fully tropical and subtropical, technically subtropical), and Meteo-France called it a subtropical system. And then, you have the satellite analysis depicting the warm-core and closed LLC, so... The storm's status is not entirely unofficial even in this regard.  Light and Dark2000  (talk) 02:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

HURDAT and WPTC
Hi there! Just a quick question to ask if you could tell me how to run a HURDAT2 file format on WPTC? I can only run it on ATCF at the moment and feel more comfortable if I could run the HURDAT format. Thanks. Layten (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays


YE Pacific Hurricane  is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

The Signpost: 16 January 2018
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wettest tropical cyclones in Honduras
Template:Wettest tropical cyclones in Honduras has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

TFA
This is to let you know that the Hurricane Marie (2014) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for March 16, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/March 16, 2018--Wehwalt (talk) 21:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the article, for "among the strongest Eastern Pacific hurricanes on record, attaining Category 5 status on the Saffir–Simpson hurricane wind scale. A large system, it had substantial effects along the coastlines of Mexico and California despite its center remaining hundreds of miles away."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:54, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

ITN
With this edit you have made the main page out of synch with the very article it points to. Could you either undo your change or fix the article per your assertion (which is disputed in the article, along with references.....) As the top story and getting hundreds of thousands of hits, we should avoid such discrepancies. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * went ahead and reverted myself. The article is continually going back and forth between 14 and 15, including the shooter and not including the shooter. It's a mess so I guess leaving it at 15 is easier. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Effects of Hurricane Matthew in Florida
Should User:Cyclonebiskit/Effects of Hurricane Matthew in Florida move to article namespace? --B dash (talk) 09:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No, it's still largely incomplete. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 21:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2018
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Suggestion on Non-tropical storms talk page
I have previously posted two suggestions on the Non-tropical storms project talk page. Please look at it and let me know if this is a good idea. I tried to ask a few others (with no response), but want to give another week before acting on it. Also on the two Super Outbreak articles: Is it alright if I put the F/EF rating in the titles of the sections that are about each tornado (ie: Tornado outbreak of April 6–9, 1998 and the Jarrell tornado)? Thank you.--Halls4521 (talk) 22:26, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:


 * 🇺🇸 Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
 * 🇩🇪 FrB.TG, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
 * 🇮🇳 Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
 * 🇺🇸 Ceranthor, 🇮🇳 Numerounovedant, Carbrera, 🇳🇱 Farang Rak Tham and 🇷🇴 Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Courses Modules are being deprecated
Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Education noticeboard/Archive 18.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * ✅ — xaosflux  Talk 17:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed merger of Mesoscale convective vortex into Mesovortices
Please go to Talk:Mesovortices if you have an opinion on the subject. Pierre cb (talk) 12:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Hurricane Max (2017)
Would you be interested in helping me draft an article for Hurricane Max (2017)? I have it here. And my apologies for reverting your edit. I'm sure a former NHC student intern would know more about tropical cyclones than I would ever know. Cooper 20:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Cyclone Gita tracking data
I see you have managed to extend the post-tropical track for Gita another couple of days beyond the JTWC and NOAA data. Could you possibly add your data to the entry at Talk:2017–18 South Pacific cyclone season/tracks, so I can include it in future updates to the season summary map? Alternatively point me to the original source of the data, if it's still available.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 13:02, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Hurricane Carmen scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that Hurricane Carmen has been scheduled as today's featured article for 3 May 2018. Please check that the article needs no polishing or corrections. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/May 3, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

2002 Pacific hurricane season summary map.png
I just made that summary map of the season. But the bad news has a bad quality that I did from PowerPoint 2013. It makes a new PNG format for the tracks. As you did the 2017 season in the Eastern Pacific with the last update of Kenneth and others. --Liam Betancourt 19:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter
The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
 * Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
 * 🇮🇳 Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
 * SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
 * Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
 * Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

What im i doing wrong
Hello i am using the wptc track maker and i have it installed properly i closed out of it and now the track wont load after i reopend it can you help me

This appears $ ./track --input TC-1.txt --format atcf --extra -bash: ./track: No such file or directory

thanks Douglas the Fun Cake or aka TheLunar2 17:21, 19 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fun Cake (talk • contribs)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for today's Hurricane Bret (1999)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter
The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
 * SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Question
Just out of curiosity, do you know where the hurricane information for ATCF is found? <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Figfires Send me a message! 01:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Retired names on EPac tracks


Add at overall including Hurricane Ioke for extratropical cyclone TCR and all Hazel, Adele, Knut, Iva, Ismael, Adolph, Alma, Manuel, Odile and Patricia on that map of the retired hurricanes in the Eastern Pacific. If you do not do it, I don't care, I'll do it myself. -- Ian Brendan 1 02:34, 19 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by IanBrendan1 (talk • contribs)

Hurricane Bret scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that I've scheduled Hurricane Bret to appear on the main page as today's featured article on 18 August 2018. If you need to make tweaks to the blurb, it is at Today's featured article/August 18, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Hurricane Hector (2018) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurricane Hector (2018) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hurricane Hector (2018) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Figfires Send me a message! 17:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Maria in Puerto Rico draft
I was wondering if your planning on expanding the effects of Maria in PR draft since you originally created it and it’s been sitting relatively unchanged for several months now. Just kinda curious. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 14:59, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:


 * Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
 * Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
 * Other contestants who qualified for the final round were 🇲🇭 Nova Crystallis, Iazyges,  SounderBruce,  🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Kosack and 🇺🇸 Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Irma
where are your sources for IRMA's wind speed??????? Do you even know what you are talking about??????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthHurts2018 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The Tropical Cyclone Report from the NHC. Winds were lowered to 155 knots in post-storm assessment. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Hurricane Ivan retirement
What do you mean by that. I just want to add more relevant information. Igor did get retired in the 2010 season. They are some articles that uses the same thing. Look at the retirement sections of Hurricanes Allen and Mitch. They both talk about retired names. Allen was replaced with Andrew with Andrew being retired in the 1992 season. Mitch was replaced with Matthew which was replaced with Martin. So none of the information is irrelevant.Flasty Jam 2 (talk) 18:10, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Spaghetti
Talk about perfect timing. I saw that the lede of Hurricane Florence was unreferenced. Well, of course it is. It's the lede. As I removed the tag I got an edit conflict.

Meteorologists are referring to the predicted paths as "spaghetti". I'm wondering if the term is documented anywhere on Wikipedia or where I might suggest it.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  15:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * We have an article on Spaghetti plots that may help explain it. They're an output of ensemble forecasting that depicts various potential outputs. It doesn't show a forecast track, just possibilities. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 15:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I added that to Spaghetti (disambiguation). It looks like the topic is covered briefly. There are lot of different types of spaghetti plots.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  15:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Tropical Cyclones in 2018
Hey, just wanted to see what your opinion is on the Tropical cyclones in 2018 article so far. I decided to work on something I was more familiar with at first before focusing on past years. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Figfires Send me a message! 23:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

ITN for Florence?
Downgraded to a TS, still stalled over the Carolinas, is it time to nominate yet? --LaserLegs (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It's right on the border of what I think ITN/C would let pass. Could be construed as US-centric bias with the low death toll, especially with Mangkhut occurring simultaneously. I'm personally waiting for more of the inland flooding event to unfold, but if you think it's ready go for it. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 19:26, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurricane Florence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hydroplane ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Hurricane_Florence check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Hurricane_Florence?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Hurricane Maria protection
Hello, I don't think your protection of Hurricane Maria is appropriate per WP:INVOLVED, since you've participated in reverting the very edit being edit warred upon and have expressed opinions on the dispute. Also reverting just before protecting the article makes it seem, even if you don't intend to, like you're using your tools to protect your preferred version. While protection for edit warring may be appropriate, I'd strongly ask that you remove your own protection and request it from an uninvolved admin at WP:RPP or another venue. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * My understanding of page protection is to restore the last stable version before the edit warring began which is the reason for that final revert before protection. However, I'll yield to involved and remove the protection momentarily. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 19:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! AFAIK most sysops generally protect whatever version is there when they get to it unless there are major and blatant issues (such as with WP:BLP) per The Wrong Version Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

MaYbE bAnNed FRoM wiKIpeDIa
Now why did i do it? Well let me see, scrapiron has been doing this for the last 3-4 months and it's getting quite ridiculous and childish. If he doesn't like the fact that we have told him multiple times to stop and he still doesn't stop attacking my edits and other's edits as well (pullchain123 bless his heart). He is nothing but an inconvenience, no matter how much unsourced or I'm being mr professional garbage he can throw at us, we will fight back, it doesn't matter how unsourced it is on wikipedia, as long as others can believe it, that's what matters. And isn't this THE PEOPLE'S encyclopedia? Furthermore, what makes him so special as to go in and delete everything in there just because it's unsourced, if he had contacted me through wikipedia and told me what he was going to change, that's fine, but he goes behind my back when I'm not looking and does this stupid shit, that's some seven year old doing it behind the teacher's back bullshit. Does he even know what a mall is? Because he must be old and useless if he is scrapiron.

The Signpost: 1 October 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Michael preps and impact
Can you help with expanding the preps and impact section on Hurricane Michael? It’s really lacking in detail rn which is bad considering it’s hours away from landfall as a C4. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 14:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Good article reassessment
1939 California tropical storm, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

I opened a discussion, as I didn't find that the article quite met GA status. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 04:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Tracks for List of Category 5 Pacific hurricanes
The track thumbnail needs to be updated on the page above, can you do it? Thanks! Hdjensofjfnen (♪ Oh, can I get a connection? Alternatively, trout me.) 16:57, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Vicente
Thank you for expanding the impact section. I had intended to do that myself, but I had internet problems yesterday and today that prohibited me from doing so. I might add some other items in tomorrow.

One other thing... could you please move User:CooperScience/Hurricane John to Hurricane John (2018)? <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Figfires Send me a message! 02:57, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * moved it to the mainspace for you. Regarding the fatalities, I believe only 4 are attributable to John and the other 3 (Chiapas) are from Ileana. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 03:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The source has attributed seven deaths to John. Unless something else contradicts this, we should leave it as seven. Appears multiple other sources are claiming John and Ileana together caused the same deaths, others claim John solely caused them, and yet another bunch claim Ileana caused them. I guess it will be impossible to tell due to them being so close together. I can add notes to the season articles and the page for John to clarify this.<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Figfires Send me a message! 13:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks CB for both the publication and clarification! Cooper 03:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is, who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:



All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:


 * wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2.
 * wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3.
 * wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall.
 * wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall.
 * wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1.

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. ,, and.

List of Pokémon page
Yeah, definitely made a mistake there. Think I got really confused. Sorry for the mess. TardisTybort (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 21:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Updating track summary
Can you update the summary map for 2018-19 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season? Thanks! Hdjensofjfnen (♪ Oh, can I get a connection? Alternatively, trout me.)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Effects of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico
Are you still working on Draft:Effects of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico or can it be moved to main namespace? Kaldari (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!
Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are, , and. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

CPHC Rebest
Hey Cyclonebiskit, any updates on the discussuion that we had some time ago? ABC paulista (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I no longer work at the NHC, had a lot of changes in my personal life, so I don't have direct contact with the specialists. Would be best to recompile that list in an email to Chris Landsea and possibly the CPHC. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, all right then. Thanks a lot for the responses and attention. ABC paulista (talk) 19:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * 🇺🇸 L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
 * Pirate_Flag_of_Henry_Every.svg, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
 * 🇩🇰 MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
 * Flag of the United States Library of Congress 2.svg Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
 * Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Effects of Hurricane Matthew in Florida has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Effects of Hurricane Matthew in Florida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 09:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Effects_of_Hurricane_Matthew_in_Florida help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Idai
I hope that I have done a decent job with Idai's article thus far. This is the first SHEM article that I have written. I archived all of the MH sources since they will be removed at some point (I think JTWC stuff is removed after a week). I hope to get impacts expanded tomorrow now that the MH will not require updating as often. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 03:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Idai deaths
552 is indeed the number... "The first landfall killed more than 120 people in Malawi, where drought conditions gave way to flooding. Malawi’s government has reported 56 additional deaths since Idai made landfall." 120 deaths and the 56 additional in Malawi are from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/fears-of-massive-toll-as-mozambique-zimbabwe-survey-damage-of-cyclone-idai/2019/03/19/4d806ad2-4a4c-11e9-8cfc-2c5d0999c21e_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f77c5d0a8802 <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 00:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * no other sources corroborate this. It appears to be a mixup on the Washington Post with the various fatality reports. The total for the first wave of flooding between Mozambique and Malawi is over 120, with Malawi reporting 56 of these. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 00:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * 122 in Malawi mentioned here: https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/News/Tanzania-sends-relief-aid-to-flood-ravaged-Zimbabwe--Malawi-/1840340-5032530-3ni1u2/index.html <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 01:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Still looks suspicious to me, especially with a quick google search not showing corroboration again. 122 is the total deaths between Mozambique and Malawi (66 and 56, respectively). A higher combined total would be mentioned explicitly somewhere if Malawi was significantly worse. Associated Press reiterated 56 death and 577 injuries today. CNN states this as well. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2019 Iran floods
– Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

ANI
The vandalism/unsourced content was reported at ANI for Es204L, but he never responded and left. The report auto-archived. Seems he is at it again. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 03:06, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * for the record I left them a message on their talk page after reverting some of their edits to season death/damage statistics a few days ago. ~ KN2731 {t · c} 05:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep in mind this individual was told to NOT edit any further and discuss the problems at ANI. He was told he would be blocked if he continued to edit. This never occurred because he "left" and the report auto-archived. He returned about 10 days later and began editing again. The fact that he has continued editing and continued to cause problems requiring several reverts is an issue. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 21:36, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

User:Cyclonebiskit/Oma
Mind if I publish Oma's article? Your sandbox is in really good shape! ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:19, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Tropical Low 22U
Hi Cyclonebiskit. I can see where you're coming from regarding not considering 22U a TD. However, if this system were in the western Pacific basin, cyclone warnings would already have been initiated on the system, with the classification of a tropical depression. It is inconsistent on the JTWC's behalf, but I expect that it is most probably because the JTWC exists primarily as a warning service for the US navy, and the US navy has many bases in the western Pacific. Notwithstanding this point, however, we have a reliable statistical source in the track file which informs us that this system is a tropical depression. It is not for us to decide whether or not it is actually a tropical depression, as we are not the people who should be deciding that. If it says TD, it is a TD. Additionally, regarding the point you made about defined circulations, the JTWC has just recently increased their outlook on tropical storm development for this system to medium due to its well-defined low level circulation with prevalent winds of 30 knots (with a few 35 knot areas as well, but predominantly 30 knots). There is no way that this system is just a disturbance or frontal low or otherwise non-cyclonic tropical system without a defined centre. ChocolateTrain (talk) 04:15, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Xerneas and Yveltal


The article Xerneas and Yveltal has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:SUSTAINED."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvalidOS talk  22:52, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Actually, nevermind. I'll withdraw because upon review, I think it does actually meet all guidelines. Feel free to ignore this message. InvalidOS  talk  22:55, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter
The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

Other notable performances were put in by Barkeep49 with six GAs, 🇺🇸 Ceranthor, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, and  Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and 🇩🇰 MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
 * Pirate_Flag_of_Henry_Every.svg (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
 * Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> <span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular"> <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> <div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Xerneas and Yveltal
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Xerneas and Yveltal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 16:21, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Xerneas and Yveltal
The article Xerneas and Yveltal you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Xerneas and Yveltal for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 17:02, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Hey
Sorry for being so extra. Shouldn't have written you and the article off without giving it a proper review. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 01:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * no harm, no foul I appreciate the additional comments and I'll get to them tomorrow after work. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 04:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Awards
Just wanted to let you know that the awards for WPTC are coming along and will be live soon. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 20:24, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2019 Nepal tornado
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Infobox storm
You are apparently clueless, so I guess hundreds of damn articles will have to be changed now for no reason. I don't know what necessitated this change. United States Man (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tornado outbreak of May 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burrell, Pennsylvania ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tornado_outbreak_of_May_2019 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tornado_outbreak_of_May_2019?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

EF3+ tornadoes
News sources are saying THREE EF3+ tornadoes. https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/local/ef3-tornado-confirmed-beavercreek/vjklb2LUNZvmtyj78jNaZN/ <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 20:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * survey teams have identified three areas of EF3 damage, not three separate tornadoes, thus far: Celina, Trotwood, and Beavercreek. The latter two areas are along the same damage path caused by the first Dayton tornado. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 20:53, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Unless every media source is wrong, it is three tornadoes. The NWS source said a tornado of at least EF3 intensity for each one, not three areas of EF3+ damage. Here is a track. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 21:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * they actually are all wrong. Refer to the preliminary tornado tracks. Trotwood and Beavercreek are along the same track with the first Dayton tornado. They're being reported as separate tornadoes because surveys are incomplete and NWS Wilmington has only released the information in three separate tweets, which is evidently creating confusion. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 21:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Turns out they just barely considered them separate tornadoes, so I was wrong. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * There may have been more tornadoes than the seven we have. Depends on how the remaining four surveys go. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 01:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * EDIT I just added a surprise EF0 tornado that was discovered. Just a question... what do you think about Cyclone Idai's chances with GAN? <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 01:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Idai needs a massive amount of information added on impact and aftermath. There's more than two months of material from ReliefWeb to sift through. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

I will see what I can do. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 02:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Is this level of tornado activity unprecedented? I know it is way above normal just looking at the last several years. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 18:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It's certainly unusually prolonged but numbers-wise it falls far short. April 2011 holds just about every record for numbers of tornadoes in one day to thirty days. The current outbreak falls short of the May 2003 tornado outbreak sequence as well. It seems extra active relative to the last few years as it's been relatively quiet up until this point. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 18:10, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks... Just so you know, I will be doing a MH split for Idai before the update on impacts and aftermath in order to keep the article at a decent, readable size... There is simply so much information to add as of now and there will be much more to add in the coming months. The article will be over 100k for sure. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 19:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019 WPTC Newsletter
<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 22:14, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Re:Talk:List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes
You might want to look at the Talk:List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes page (and the 3 new sections). Thanks.--Halls4521 (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Halola
Would you be okay with a good article nomination for Typhoon Halola? <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 06:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you today for Tropical Storm Faxai (2007)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Merged 2019 Nepal tornado
I saw a merger tag placed on the article about the March 2019 southern Nepal tornado that I was working on. So, I completed the merge and also edited the resulting article extensively to make it stylistically consistent and to remove redundancies. But, I think the final article has more content from the source article than the destination. So, I am not sure if I did it right. Maybe, I should have merged it the other way? I just liked the title better for specificity purpose but I am not sure anymore. I think I misread the discussion on the source talk page, also. Would you please look at what I've done and see if I've made some mistakes in the merger process? I was not sure if I was supposed to copy the discussions on the talk page from source to destination as well because it doesn't say anything like that on the "How to merge" guidelines, so I left it in the source talk page for now. Thanks! Usedtobecool <sup style="font-family:Candara; color:#0000ee">TALK  20:05, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter
The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * 🇳🇫 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
 * Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
 * SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pokémon Sword and Shield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Football stadium ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pok%C3%A9mon_Sword_and_Shield check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pok%C3%A9mon_Sword_and_Shield?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Hurricane Lane
I was just wondering if you had any plans for Lane. I had been planning to get the article up to FA after the release of its CPAC TCR. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 20:48, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I usually take care of the EPac Cat 5s in the year after they occur. Once the pressure snafu is figured out with Lane it'll at least be going to GAN. Will be working on Willa later on. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Just note HH and I had started working on Willa a while back and do plan to take it to FAC. Willa will be my priority after I finish the Sergio update in the next couple days or so. If you do decide to pursue a FAC eventually, I would like to co-nominate as a significant editor of the article. I am pursuing a 2018 EPAC featured topic and it has a good chance of happening. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 01:57, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to let you know that I am starting on Willa work. Since I did create a majority of the storm articles for 2018 EPAC (all except for Bud and Carlotta), I simply want to see them through. I intend to expand Willa significantly as the impact was quite severe. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 17:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Looking forward to your work on Willa! Featured topics take an incredible amount of work and you're well on your way to having the 2018 PHS be one. Glad to have you as part of WPTC; always wonderful to have new diligent and detailed writers. Keep up the awesome work! ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat)

I have Sergio up for review right now and hope to get most of the Willa work done this weekend. HH will make more additions once he gets some time. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 01:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Faxai (2007) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that Tropical Storm Faxai (2007) has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 30 August 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/August 30, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 17:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daulatpur–Saturia tornado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daulatpur ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Daulatpur%E2%80%93Saturia_tornado check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Daulatpur%E2%80%93Saturia_tornado?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)