User talk:Cyclonebiskit/Archive5

Re: Track map imagery
I recently finished JTWC tracks for 2006 and 2007. All of 2005's are still out of date, and I'm working on those when I can.

I can really only help with the track map program if you are wanting to run it under Mac OS X. I first installed MacPort and then I installed all the required packages (Gettext, etc.) using that. MacPort may need some other installations like X11 and other Apple stuff it tell you, but that's pretty easy to do. Once you have those you can install the track map program exactly as the instructions tell you. Potapych (talk) 02:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Heads up
Just an on-Wiki reminder, try and focus on one project at a time. Otherwise, nothing gets done. ;) Cheers. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #23
–Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  03:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Links

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Cyclonebiskit (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

2001 AHS Timeline
Since you helped previously when I was last working on it, I'd like if you helped give any comments needed to complete the A to FL chapter so that I can see what is needed for it to pass FLC. Thanks! -- Dylan  620  ( Contribs ) 19:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Tropical Depression Auring (2009) Track Map
OK! I made another version of both the Auring's track map and the seasonal map using the JTWC's running best track. -Ramisses (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

2008–09 Australian region cyclone season
is correct with their edits and didn't add false information to the article. Tropical Cyclone Advice for System 1 and Tropical Cyclone Forecast Track Map System 1. Bidgee (talk) 02:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Hurricane Allen class
The original reference from NHC contains no information on Mexican impact of Allen, although it was probably significant in the northeastern most section of the Yucatan peninsula and mainland Mexico. Are we holding these articles to higher standards than original sources would provide? Even if we do, C class allows for missing sections within articles. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Not than wikipedia standards, they're not. If you think the other sections need more info, add expansion tags and say it on the talk page.  Thegreatdr (talk) 15:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool. I've been noticing over the past several months that people would rather pass over the C and B class options, going straight from Start to GA nomination.  I've noticed this has been a personal preference of a couple of the members of the project, and it has allowed me to re-read the class structure within wikipedia.  It doesn't seem like we use C class as often as we should as a project.  You're right of course, it is minor, but it does impact the wikiwork score of the project.  Thegreatdr (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Cinda's track map
The track map is already made with the running best track. Only the track of the Cinda's remnant low is lacking and I think it's not very, very important. -Ramisses (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Cyclone Charlotte
Cheers for the notice, I have passed it on :) Andy (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Fanele's track map
Sorry Cyclonebiskit. I unfortunately have no much time available in the coming days. -Ramisses (talk) 23:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

1998 PTS
It does not appear I've placed any information concerning that season online. I'll take a look at the data this coming week and see if this is a problem to resolve. I can tell you this...Clark AFB was already gone by then due to Yunya and the volcano in the summer of 1991. Thegreatdr (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Why was my article tagged for speedy?
It did not even remotely fall under G4. The article was not "substantially similar" to the its version before it was redirected. There was no deletion discussion involved whatsoever. Why? Jonathan321 (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC) I'm sorry that it was incorrectly referenced. I was soon going to correctly reference it, as it was midnight when I created the article. Similar to your experience with deletion, I do not have much experience in article creation (except for this article). I wouldn't call the article "extraordinarily short". Many, many stubs are a mere sentence, and they are kept. I will probably work on it some more, but I would appreciate it if you would restore it, as I feel rather uncomfortable doing it myself. Cheers, Jonathan321 (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Please Assume Good Faith!
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tropical_Storm_Dongo&diff=266250315&oldid=266249220 ''Read the article before slapping a tag on it. It's in the beginning of the MH, it wasn't OR....''] is rather bad faith! Since I did look at the only source that was there until you added this source and I also didn't say it was OR. Bidgee (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Calling my edit vandalism is bad faith! Bidgee (talk) 04:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Please don't template experienced editors. I know you're not trying to, but it's very annoying to template regulars. VX! 04:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no policy against "templating experienced/long term editors". It's clear that Cyclonebiskit assumed bad faith with my edits which my edit were clearly good faith edits. Bidgee (talk) 04:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:DTTR –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  04:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Essays are not policies or guildlines! Bidgee (talk) 04:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, correct Essays are not policy, but we still use and heed many of them. For example, WP:SNOW, think how many times that has applied to WP:XfD or WP:RfA. VX! 04:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Or WP:HAMMER is another good one. Just because it's an essay doesn't mean it's not good advice. :) VX! 04:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW is not the same issue. It's a bit like talking about Oranges and Apples, both are fruit but they don't look or taste the same. Bidgee (talk) 05:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Bidgee, I find it ironic that you come to Cyclonebiskit's talk page to complain about AGF, yet you leave a template notice. Perhaps you should heed your own advice? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  05:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? I left a nice message but it seems that Cyclonebiskit didn't read it or choose not to assume good faith to my edits. How would you like being called a vandal? Again there is no policy or guildline against "templating experienced/long term editors". Bidgee (talk) 05:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, I wouldn't like to be called a vandal, but I certainly wouldn't make a stink of it. Also, templating an established editor is most certainly bad-faith, regardless of whether there is an official policy which says that. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  05:07, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Upgrading of articles due to media coverage
In principle, I'm not opposed to this idea, so I upgraded the 1985 Atlantic hurricane season to High as well. Besides, at the time it had the record for number of landfalling systems. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Old sandboxes that should be deleted
✅ –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  21:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

1972
Hello, this is Irmela, can you rate Timeline of the 1972 Atlantic hurricane season? Thanks -- Saola Talk to Me 21:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I have a little problem, see the talk page. -- Saola Talk to Me 22:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

1972--Again
I just moved it to FLC, I forgot and remembered when I was updating the notice board.-- Saola Talk to Me 22:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

1998 Comfrey – St. Peter tornado outbreak
Hi there- after a few months break I'd like to make another run at FAC for this article. Do you have any comments or suggestions about if you think it is ready? Rather than put it up for another peer review, I figured I'd just do a quick survey first in case people think one is not needed.

Honestly, I never quite understood what was wrong with it the first time (specifics) but I think I have found a few minor improvements here and there. WxGopher (talk) 05:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Typhoon Chaba
Per your request on IRC earlier herre are the advisorys for Typhoon Chaba Jason Rees (talk) 22:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * First Poor - N/A
 * First Fair - 0000z, 18-08-2004
 * First TCFA - 1430z, 18-08-2004

First Warning : 1800Z 18 Aug 04 Last Warning : 0600Z 31 Aug 04, Extra-tropical Max Intensity : 155 kts, gusts to 190 kts Landfall : Near City of Kushikino, Kyushu Japan - Near Hikari, Honshu Japan - Near Shizunai, Hokkaido Japan

JTWC Advisories
 * 01 // 02 // 03 // 04 // 05 // 06 // 07 // 08 // 09 // 10 //
 * 11 // 12 // 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 //
 * 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 29 // 30 //
 * 31 // 32 // 33 // 34 // 35 // 36 // 37 // 38 // 39 // 40 //
 * 41 // 42 // 43 // 44 // 45 // 46 // 47 // 48 // 49 // 50 // 51 // (Final)

Prognastic reasonings
 * 01 // 02 // 03 // 04 // 05 // 06 // 07 // 08 // 09 // 10 //
 * 11 // 12 // 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 //
 * 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // (final)

Accusing me of adding incorect information to the 2008-09 South-west Indian Ocean Cyclone Season page.
I didn't, the jTWC did upgrade the system to Tropical Cyclone 13S, and Meteo France assigned the name Gael, I didn't put incorrect anything on there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.143.29.183 (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The JTWC did upgrade to TC13S, but I don't see an advisory saying MF upgraded to Gael yet. -- RattleMan 21:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

2008-09 South Pacific Cyclone Season.
Okay, someone keeps adding a "Tropical Depression 09F" to that season, but I cannot find anything on the net about it actually existing....does it exist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Browns902 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Mala

 * 24-04-06 0600z
 * 25-04-06 0600z
 * 26-04-06 0000z // 1200z // 1800z
 * 27-04-06 0900z // 1200z // 1800z //
 * 28-04-06 0000z // 0100z // 0900z // 1200z //
 * 29-04-06 0900z // 1800z //

JTWC 23-04-06 18z // 24-04-06 10z // Jason Rees (talk) 22:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

convert
The template is not broken. The template automatically conserves the number of significant figures. If you want a different level of precision, add |sigfig=# to the end of the template ("#" being the number of significant figures you would like). I have restored the template to February 2009 tornado outbreak using this trick. Also, some of the figures you changed are too precise (for instance, when you say "winds near 70 miles per hour", the conversion should be 110 km/h, not 112 km/h, since you're dealing with approximate figures. If you have any questions/comments let me know.- Running On  Brains  06:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Do NOT delete these pages OR merge them
I worked hard on these pages and if it's so important, find references yourself. (I couldn't find a huge amount of information on those storms, they were almost twenty years ago, that's why the paragraph was not extremely long) besides, there are other short pages on Wikipedia, RIGHT? I also put the new articles there so that the info on those storms wasn't just a couple vague "descriptive" sentences, and that reference at the bottom of the pages leads to a page for NHC info on those two storms(best track,strength data,etc.), so there aren't ANY lack of sufficient references. By the way, I'm about fifteen years old, so if you want to criticize it,or delete my profile, or block me from editing (because I'm not "Old" enough to be as smart as you adults).(Because you adults think all people my age are just KIDS!!), besides, they were my first articles, so I don't have as much "Experience" as you adults who think they own Wikipedia!!Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 22:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Age does not matter; typing in all caps and accusing other editors of ageism is what we should worry about. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  22:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

You are sixteen?
If you are sixteen, how did you learn so much about Wikipedia? When did you start learning about writing articles on Wikipedia? (I thought all people on here were adults!)I guess I'm not the only "younger" person on here after all. Also, some pages (ie. 2008-09 South Pacific cyclone season, 2009 Pacific typhoon season, etc. need to probably be updated a little faster).Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments needed
You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Meteorology, WikiProject Severe weather, and/or WikiProject Non-tropical storms. I have made a proposal to start an official assessment page for these three projects, under the WP:METEO banner. Since this would need significant participation to work properly, I'd like input from as many interested parties as possible (even those who may not watch the project pages), so please visit the discussion here and leave your thoughts/opinions. Thanks! - Running On  Brains  02:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

GAN for Typhoon Conson (2004)
I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 03:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

DYK Cyclone Arthur (2007)
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. XLerate (talk) 00:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)