User talk:Cyclonenim/Archive Jan10

Dermatology-related content progress
Thanks again for your help in the past with the dermatology-related content on Wikipedia. We have continued to make significant progress with the Bolognia push. Also, the most recent project popular page statistics are out, and the list of cutaneous conditions continues to rise, now #49, up from #65 last month. Thanks again for your support! ---kilbad (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I've responded to your comments..
..and attempted to explain my position at RMHED's talk page. Cheers.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 17:03, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Nancy talk  19:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

RFA
Hi, if you don't think you could pass then the system is more broken than I thought - mind you I supported you last April. I would hope that even if only 6 people get through RFA in February you could be one of them, and if you ever do agree to stand I'd be honoured to nominate you. You have been active since 2006, and one of the reasons why I believe RFA to be broken is that you and editors like you didn't become admins long ago.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  16:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)