User talk:Cyclopia/Archive 8

Belated Happy New Year with a Toast!


~ TheGeneralUser  (talk)  — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A Very Happy (belated) New Year to you Cyclopia! Enjoy the Whisky ~ TheGeneralUser   (talk)  23:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Effective method
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Effective method. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Recent edit at Cannabis (drug)
You may be interested in my recent addition to the Talk page of Cannabis (drug). This further highlights some peer reviewed medical journals. Rlsheehan (talk) 15:10, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * More recent edits on the article today involve an editor removing the section you worked on the other day. I wonder if you've got this article on your watch list? I ask because it seems to be under attack, along with other cannabis-related articles, right now and could use extra watchers.   petrarchan47  t  c   22:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * It is, but today's been a mess. Thanks for keeping my heads up -I'll look now. -- Cycl o pia talk  00:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem, it is probably more of a long-term request.  petrarchan47  t  c   00:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * It looks like we could use you again when you're available. Parts of the "safety" section that seemed well con-sensed are coming under question. I said I would ask you to come by and comment.  petrarchan47  t  c   01:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, however I suspect you'll be disappointed. -- Cycl o pia talk  09:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 14:26, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Ryan Vesey 17:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Renewable energy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Renewable energy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anhuiphyton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Septa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Writ Keeper's removal
User:Writ Keeper is removing Talk Page content under copyright issues on .61.245.165.22 (talk) 17:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * He's right, you can't copy verbatim copyrighted stuff. -- Cycl o pia talk  19:17, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Andiva
Hello! You created the article about Andiva, I think this article will be interesting to you.

Ivantsov, A. Yu (2007). "Small Vendian transversely Articulated fossils". Paleontological Journal 41 (2): 113–122. Free temporary link to pdf

Andiva, Ovatoscutum and Dickinsonia had an no carapace. It was a fantasy of the Mikhail Fedonkin, which is not confirmed by fossils. Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 22:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC))


 * Thanks! In fact I wrote "in the original Fedonkin reconstruction" or something like that. I'll look at the paper. -- Cycl o pia talk  22:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Can you point me where in the paper it discusses the existence or less of the carapace hypothesized by Fedonkin? -- Cycl o pia talk  22:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The hypothesis of the Mikhail Fedonkin not discusses in published articles. I discussed this idea with Andrey Ivantsov. In the published articles you can find that imprints of the Proarticulata are usually strongly compressed, distorted, curly or sprained (particularly this pertains to Ovatoscutum, Yorgia, Andiva and Dickinsonia) that disagrees to the carapace hypothesis. For example read Feeding traces of Proarticulata - the Vendian Metazoa Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2013 (UTC))


 * Thanks, but if I want to fix the article, I need WP:RS explicitly refuting it, otherwise I sin of WP:SYNTHESIS. I however made clear it's just the original interpretation. -- Cycl o pia talk  09:50, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * For this reason I not create the new articles in Wiki and not edit the existing Wiki articles about some Ediacaran organism. I do not want to the promote invalid published information, and I can not refer to the not published information. We shall wait the new scientific articles. Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC))


 * Then what are you doing here? Anyway, thanks a lot, and I'll be cautious in the future: however I'm curious to know why such new information is unpublished. -- Cycl o pia  talk  14:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It is published: for Yorgia see Ivantsov 2010, for Dickinsonia see Ivantsov 2010, Gehling 2005, Dzik and Ivantsov 1999, Runnegar 1982.
 * Chondroplon is known from single deformed fragmentary specimen, and can be Dickinsonia (Hofmann 1987).
 * WTF? You said it wasn't published, above, when I asked for papers. I'll look. -- Cycl o pia talk  21:08, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * In these articles the Fedonkin hypothesis is not discussed and mentionned, there broughted facts which disagrees to his hypothesis. Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC))
 * But that's fine as well -I mean, if they explicitly state an alternative interpretation ,then I can put it in the article. -- Cycl o pia talk  00:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Shortcoming of these article is not about Andiva. Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 08:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC))

There are two ways to express disagreement or doubt to the hypothesis:
 * 1) Ignoring. The idea is not popular amongst inhabitants and broad scientific public, is not accepted amongst specialists. No need in special immediate disclaimer. There are more hot topics.
 * 2) Disclaimer (for example, Kimberella)

There are more hot topics. M. Fedonkin proposed that Kimberella had a dense shell and a proboscis with two teeth. He had interpreted this animal as oldest mollusk (Fedonkin and Waggoner 1997, Fedonkin, Simonetta and Ivantsov 2007). This idea is become popular amongst inhabitants and scientists, is become the base for other hypothesises. However many characters of the imprints contradict the hypothesis of a shell and proboscis. The general body plan of Kimberella is substantially different from those previously proposed. (Ivantsov 2009, Ivantsov 2010, Ivantsov 2012) Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC))

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

WP:EVENTS
I know it's late in coming, but I posted a reply for you in Wikipedia talk:Notability (events). I would love to get more ideas on how to tweak the wording there. Location (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Taxobox for Vendian/Ediacaran fossils
I offer not to use generator Template:Taxonomy for Vendian organisms. Their classification and interpretation are weakly designed, inconsistent and changed in the time.

Arumberia is not trace fossil. See Kolesnikov et al. 2012 Other articles about Arumberia links to pdf-files are temporary Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 15:41, 27 January 2013 (UTC))
 * Bland 1984
 * Callow et al. 2011
 * McIlroy 1987
 * Kumar et Pandey 2008
 * Kumar et Pandey 2009
 * Glaessner et Waller 1975


 * Thanks a lot!! Edit the page as you see fit. -- Cycl o pia talk  16:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 18:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Andiva
The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

"Safety section" needs you :)
Hi, if you get a chance, could you stop by here and help tie up a few loose ends to resolve the safety section dispute?  petrarchan47  t  c   04:57, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nikola Tesla
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nikola Tesla. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Rizana Nafeeks' Image
Since 9 editors including 3 administrators(including Jimbo Wales) agreed that the image qualifies under fair use, I have added back the image to the page Execution of Rizana Nafeek. User:Future Perfect at Sunrise removed it. There is a going on currently. Please let others know whether still you believe the Image has a Fair Use value?61.245.172.21 (talk) 15:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:41, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Perfection
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Perfection. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Help requested for tau.
User_talk:Tazerdadog/Tau_(Proposed_mathematical_constant) for User:Tazerdadog/Tau_(Proposed_mathematical_constant) to become live. John W. Nicholson (talk) 16:08, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Microsoft Windows
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Microsoft Windows. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Computus
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Computus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:16, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:40, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bicycle helmets in Australia
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bicycle helmets in Australia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 13:51, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 20:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Suicide
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Suicide. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 13:12, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 18:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 02:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:13, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ribbon (computing)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ribbon (computing). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avalofractus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Newfoundland and Spaniard's Bay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. ''Your placing of a vandalism warning on the talk page of DracoEssentialis over her change on the image used on Jimmy Wales was absolutely inappropriate. The choice of infobox image is a content dispute and you should have followed WP:BRD rather than templating the user and then running off to AN. Please AGF in the future.'' &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Ouch! You've used a template to send a to an experienced editor. Please review Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes. &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Are you just kidding, or are you really thinking that the addition of that image with that caption is a standard content dispute? -- Cycl o pia talk  17:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Tell me which one of these it is: WP:VANDTYPES. It may be that it's one of these: WP:NOTVAND, but as you can see, those are not vandalism.  I would say that a change in infobox image with any reasonably descriptive caption is in fact a content dispute.  You may legitimately disagree with that, but there is no way it's vandalism, and you should not have used twinkle to issue a vandalism warning template.  Your failure to AGF strikes me as WP:TWABUSE.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * "Uploading shock images, inappropriately placing explicit images on pages, or simply using any image in a way that is disruptive. It was trolling, pure and simple. -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  17:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Given that I never used the word "vandalism", nor does the template I used, there's little you can wikilawyer around the definition of vandalism. It was trolling, and as such I marked it as disruptive editing, and that it was disruptive is clear. -- Cycl o pia talk  18:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Misquoting
This is not what I said. Do you have the ability to understand "A is true, and B is false"? True, the articles are nice and well-written. False, they do not belong on the home page. The two facts are independent of one another. I get the feeling that you are more interested in winning and argument and gloating than in coming to some sort of shared understanding. Jehochman Talk 19:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You get wrong feelings, and yes, that is what you say: it is a verbatim copy of your post. I honestly do not fathom what's wrong with having "nice, well written" articles on the front page, and I am asking a honest question. -- Cycl o pia talk  20:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I specified on the thread we're talking about their placement on the talkpage. The question still stands, and I am still baffled. -- Cycl o pia talk  20:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * (If you want, the question is exactly about the fact that "the two facts are independent of one another" -in my opinion they're not independent at all, and that's what I do not understand).-- Cycl o pia talk  20:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

CFD
Hello; you recently participated in a discussion about Category:Reissue albums, which I closed as "no consensus". The category has now been re-nominated for deletion; you may be interested in participating in this second nomination. The discussion is here. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beothukis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newfoundland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Ansh666 17:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation Museum
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation Museum. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)