User talk:Cycy234

Welcome!
Hello, Cycy234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Section 377A of the Penal Code (Singapore) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. – robertsky (talk) 06:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! And with regards to your question, the MRHA Act is basically a recent policy that also protects the LGBTQ community. It's basically all over the internet except the Wikipedia page. And so I thought, why not add in to be more accurate? It's okay if that's not possible, we can just leave it as it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cycy234 (talk • contribs)
 * Need sources. If it is all over the internet, I am sure you can provide some links for this policy. – robertsky (talk) 07:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, found it in the text of the article. However, I think 377A page should remain untouched since it is a separate law from MRHA. I don't think both have been tested in a same case. – robertsky (talk) 07:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah sure, alright. Whatever you feel is right. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cycy234 (talk • contribs)