User talk:Cyde/Archive019

Category:Anti-creationism
Hi. This is about this debate. I believe you should take a second look at the discussion. You don't seem to have interpreted the debate correctly. The discussion makes it clear that the article should be kept. A.Z. 01:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI - September 2007
The September 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 09:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

PM
I have tried to PM you for days and no response. Please message me on IRC as soon as you get this. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Some things to think about
I have not seen you address this anywhere, so perhaps I have merely missed it, in which case please simply point me to where. However, it is possible you have not addressed this because no one has asked you, and you didn't think it appropriate to expound on an issue which is being, by and large, handled elsewhere, and in which it is possible your quickness to post without thinking things through may have caused harm already. I therefore ask you to consider the following:

It appears you may have been too zealous in your pursuit of wrongdoing to consider whether you yourself might be doing wrong by your handling of the situation. When it came to your attention, however it happened, that some edits had been oversighted on an account which had not been used in two years, did you consider that due to the very nature of oversight - as a way of removing that which is no one's business and can cause harm - that more harm than good could have come of a very public series of accusations of wrongdoing? Did you consider that the person in question has been stalked and harassed repeatedly, and that perhaps there were good reasons for the sock and for the oversight, of which you were unaware? Did you consider that by asking discreetly you could alert those in a position to investigate of your concerns without potentially causing more problems and grief? Now that some little time has passed, and you have had a chance to consider, do you think in the future you would still handle things the same way? I would hate to think that you see real life concerns of safety and privacy as secondary to minor infractions on Wikipedia.

I am also distressed by the way you presented this. "Caught red handed" could have easily been "area for possible concern" had you shown any restraint at all. It bears the appearance of preferring accusations over investigations, in a situation where you knew you did not know all. Even when an admin finds what appears to be wrongdoing in a newbie or a known troublemaker, the professional and gracious phrasing is preferred, rather than this phrasing which you used, which reads like yellow-tabloid "exposure" and damn the facts or who might be hurt.

I sincerely hope you have learned something from this incident, and you give careful consideration to how to handle future situations. I would appreciate a brief acknowledgement that this is so. KillerChihuahua?!? 12:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I already got messages like this that I responded to, but they were in private. Considering your first paragraph, that might make more sense. -- Cyde Weys 13:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Does that mean you're planning to send me an email? KillerChihuahua?!? 11:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I don't really have anything to say that I haven't already said to others. -- Cyde Weys  19:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Then would you please point me to where you have said those things, as I requested (perhaps you missed it) in the first sentence? KillerChihuahua?!? 09:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It was in private, like I suggested. -- Cyde Weys  00:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * But you're not planning to email me? I was not privy to that private conversation. KillerChihuahua?!? 06:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

You can email me if you wish. -- Cyde Weys 02:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I have already made my comments and asked my questions above. I see no reason to paste that into an email. Are you planning to answer me? KillerChihuahua?!? 03:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Honestly, no. I'm hella busy recently (barely any time for Wikipedia-related activities), and I this matter is over and done with.  Everyone has already said what they felt needed to be said.  -- Cyde Weys  00:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

CFR request
Could you please instruct the Cydebot to rename Category:House of Battenberg to Category:Battenberg family? It was not per a CFR, but rather per the WP:RM request at Talk:Battenberg family I closed. Thanks. Duja ► 09:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Cydebot rename of Category:Members of the United States House of Representatives from Georgia
User:Cydebot recently renamed Category:Members of the United States House of Representatives from Georgia to Category:Members of the United States House of Representatives from Georgia (U.S. state). The rationale given in the history at List of United States Representatives from Georgia was the change was implemented in response to disambiguation concerns between Georgia (country) and Georgia (U.S. state) at WP:CFD. However, those CDF concerns were specific to a category on state highways in Georgia (U.S. state). Using the modifier U.S. state is only necessary when it is unclear whether the entity being referenced is the country or the U.S. state. I think this catetory should be renamed back to its original Category:Members of the United States House of Representatives from Georgia. The fact that the category includes United States House of Representatives means the parenthetical (U.S. state) is redundant. Is this something you could have Cydebot revert or should I make a new request at WP:CFD?Dcmacnut 04:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Attack sites
Remedies have been proposed at Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision which relate to you. You are welcome to participate as appropriate in the arbitration. Fred Bauder 00:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

I fail to see how the proposed remedy follows from the proposed finding of fact. I don't see how you can get "desysopping" from "In response to allegations by the banned user Wordbomb, who has been engaged in a lengthy campaign of harassment of SlimVirgin, a dialog was initiated by Cyde with respect to the allegations." Especially because, as I've repeatedly said, I never even dealt with WordBomb before, thus I didn't know who he was, and wasn't aware there was a connection between him and AntiSocialMedia.net anyway. -- Cyde Weys 02:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

1E6
A milestone, Cyde. Thanks for all the effort. Rich Farmbrough, 15:45 23 September 2007 (GMT).

Captain Sim page
Hi,

I wanted to make a page for Captain Sim, but noticed that there already was one but has been deleted several times in the past. I just want to know if it is OK for me to make a page or if it is not allowed. Thanks. Pash Master 06:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

The deleted article is actually fairly high quality, so rather than rewriting it from scratch I would go to deletion review and argue to have it undeleted. My rationale would be that it did not meet the speedy criterion that it was deleted under, and that it should have at least deserved an Articles for deletion. -- Cyde Weys 02:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Too Fast Deletion of Category
What gives with the way too rapid deletion of the category "Northern California Weather"? There was no notice I'm aware of, and furthermore, why then does the category "Southern California Weather" remain? The same rationale should apply to both categories. Tmangray 21:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

People from Boston, Massachusetts
Cydebot is moving articles from the category "People from Boston" to "People from Boston, Massachusetts." But the new category is redlinked, and I was unable to follow the link and create a page. Even after purging and bypassing my browser cache, I still see a page that has not been created yet. What's up? Has this category been blocked? -- Rob C. alias Alarob 17:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Errmm...
...can you check what went on with the post-CfD process relating to Category:Young Men organization of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? It contains, rather surprisingly, an article about the history of cricket in Pakistan, and is parented by other Pakistan cricket categories. Thanks! BencherliteTalk 23:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Divisive userboxes
Requesting your input concerning some speedy deletions. Please see: User:CharonX (and a semi-related DRV). - jc37 00:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVII - October 2007
The October 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 09:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging
I had been tagging image with fair use rationale that seems to be invalid per WP:NFCC - like this one. Am i right in tagging this? As far as i know, the header where the phrase Fair use rationale for (name of the article where the image is used) must contain the title of the article and the image description of this one doesn't follow. Thanks. BritandBeyonce (talk•contribs) 09:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania 2008/Conference of the Americas
Hello, As you may or may not know, Alexandria, Egypt was selected to host Wikimania 2008. So as to prevent the hard work of the many Wikimedians involved in the Atlanta bid from going to waste, we have decided to host a conference for the Americas. This is in no way an attempt to compete with Wikimania or make a statement against Wikimania.

As one of the people signed up to help with the Wikimania Atlanta bid, we hope you will join us at the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas. We will be having a meeting tonight in IRC tonight (Oct 15) at 9:30PM in #cota-atlanta on irc.freenode.org to discuss the conference. For more information about IRC see.

For more information about the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas see http://www.cota-atlanta.org and our wiki http://www.cota-atlanta.org/wiki.

If you do not wish to receive further notices about the COTA please remove your name from our notify list. --Cspurrier 20:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Image:Cyde.png
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at. Thank you. Rocket000 22:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

New abusive sockpuppet of User:SlimVirgin
The new one is User:Sunsplash. --Stroynaya Deva 23:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've restored this without any opinion whatso ever on the truth of the above.. Cyde can remove this if he wants. SirFozzie 01:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Shortcut for User:Cyde/List of candidates for speedy deletion
I've made a shortcut for User:Cyde/List of candidates for speedy deletion - WP:SDL. However, the bot overwrites the entire page when it listifies the category so the shortcut template comes off. Can you configure it to prepend   before the listify output? Thanks! Resurgent insurgent 03:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Your solution works just as well. Thanks! Resurgent insurgent 03:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Belfast ships
With regard to Category:Belfast built ships, could you move or delete the talk page? Thanks. -- Mal 01:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Problem with re-name
Your bot's edit and (|and the preceding renaming of the category) made an incorrect edit to the Trigun article. The renaming of the category assumes that all of the shows in that category are original programing of Adult Swim and/or Cartoon Network. This is not the case. I'll go ahead and remove the category from Trigun, but you may want to check all of the other articles that were affected by this renaming. I've posted the same concern to the Category's talk page. ++Arx Fortis 17:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Brett larsen
I have moved this to User:Brettlarsen. Bearian 18:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't know why you notified me of this, but in the future, please tag the redirect left in mainspace for speedy deletion. I got rid of this one. -- Cyde Weys 02:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Police Rugby League -Victoria
i need some help and some answers please.

The Victoria Vikings have a page that keeps being tagged for one thing or another and it is very annoying.

I don't want to get bogged down in wiki jargon and computer talk. In laymans terms, there is a good page written about a club/league that has played an integral role in certain aspects of rugby league in Australia. It deserves to be available for reading but various people keep wanting to interfere with it. At present it is tagged with a comment that it needs to be wikified. Not sure why, it was good enough for months so why the issue now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.25.230.150 (talk) 23:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

An essay up for deletion
Just noticed that nobody had pointed this out to you, and it doesn't look like you've had a chance to give your opinion. Thought I'd make you aware just in case you hadn't noticed it and had anything to add. I'm assuming notifying the original author won't be considered canvassing... --Onorem♠Dil 19:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me. Apparently the person nominating it for deletion didn't feel it necessary to do me the courtesy of informing me. Makes his deletion reason seem kind of hypocritical. -- Cyde Weys 02:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

AFBot
I would like a bot, that checks contribs, and for WP:FOWL, or any other WikiProjects, moves a user to the inactive part of a list of participants, and vice versa. If possible, could you make the account named "AFBot". Thank you. Dreamy §  20:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I would also like to be the operator, if not the programmer. Dreamy  §  20:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Please see WP:BOT. I don't have anything to do with vetting bots. -- Cyde Weys 21:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Veropedia
Hmm, that was my fault partially- I misread your blog entry. I've modified it accordingly. Is that a fair statement as of now? JoshuaZ 01:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

That's fine, thanks. -- Cyde Weys 02:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Summary
Would make removing the individual line much easier. Thanks! SkierRMH 03:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Since when did Cydebt add templates to book articles? As far as I know, I didn't code anything to do that. Can you point to some example diffs of the problematic edits? -- Cyde Weys 03:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

List of candidates for speedy deletion
Hi, I left an enhancement request for the CSD listing bot here. Could you let me know if you are able to incorporate the enhancement into the bot. Thanks. → AA (talk) — 16:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

DC meetup #3
Interested in meeting-up with a bunch of your wiki-friends? Please take a quick look at Meetup/DC 3 and give your input about the next meetup. Thank you. This automated notice was delivered to you because you are on the Meetup/DC/Invite. BrownBot 01:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVIII - November 2007
The November 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 15:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Need Help
Hello there, first off I'm really sorry to bother you, but I have a problem with another administraitor, the users name is: Can't sleep, clown will eat me

It started when some other kids were fooling around with Wikipedia at our school, and they eventually got us banned until March 2008 by Can't sleep, clown will eat me. On his message about all of the vandalism made by the vandals, he said that we should try to "create an account" but unfortunatly, Can't sleep, clown will eat me locked us from even making our own accounts! When we tried to tell him on his talk page, it wouldn't let us send him a message, I had to make this account, Weasel123, at my own house. We finally went to the last thing we could do, trying to appeal it on our own user page, but again, we were blocked. If you could tell Can't sleep, clown will eat me that when he ties to block peple, he should at least try to let us send him a message and tell him what happened tht would be really great.

Thank You Shadowbot3 00:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weasel123 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Cydebot request - recategorisation
Could you please merge all non-category pages in Category:Anime and manga characters by series to Category:Lists of anime and manga characters, per this CFD? I am reluctant to list this task at WP:CFD/W for fear that the bot may also automatically move all categories. – Black Falcon (Talk) 23:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

CydeBot, The Legend of Zelda series characters
I'm trying to find the speedy CFD discussion that CydeBot used to move all of our pages to this new Category. I can't find that discussion or any mention of that discussion on the project page. I've tried looking up the editors that CydeBot lists as authors for that discussion, and they don't turn up any Zelda-related edits in the last few months.

Could you please have it reverse these edits, then? The move does not fit any of the guidelines for speedy renaming, and is in fact messier than what the guidelines suggest (i.e. "X in Y", or "Characters from The Legend of Zelda series", as we had it).

Thank you for time, and sorry to trouble you. Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 03:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

category:category - was it something I said?
Hi Cyde - after closing a couple of CfDs, I left the results on the working page, but we've ended up with Category:Category:Association for Computing Machinery magazines and Category:Category:Association for Computing Machinery Special Interest Groups. I thought I'd followed the instructions correctly, it being my first time using my shiny newly acquired mop on the CfD page, but I messed up. Sorry! Can you fix this? BencherliteTalk 04:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed it myself, to teach myself a lesson! BencherliteTalk 14:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:User WikiProject MusicBrainz
I'd appreciate it if you'd restore Template:User WikiProject MusicBrainz. Thanks. --Mperry (talk) 19:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Just thought I'd leave a note to let you know that I'm back. I can't see why you would care in the slightest, but always worth a shot.  ♥ Fr  ed  il  04:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Please??
Can you please run Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Generate categories for Wikiproject High School Musical? Thanks! -- Whiteandnerdy111 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Clydebot request
I was wondering if you could have clydebot remove the Roman Catholic politicians category from all the pages that it is on like you did with the other religious categories. I've been trying but there's over 600+ and that is way to many for me. Thanks here's the discussion if you don't have it Categories for discussion/Log/2007 November 21 Gang14 04:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm on it. -- Cyde Weys 17:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Secret Page?
Why did you delete my Secret Page? Che tbl ong talk to me 12:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Please read What Wikipedia is not. -- Cyde Weys 16:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Unblock Image:Flushvul_numbered.jpg and Image:Male genitalia reworked.jpg
Hey Can you unblock so that I may use it in the article: reproductive system. I'm doing a major over haul of the page and I want to add this pic, but due to its use in vandalism it's blocked for new pages without admin approval. Thanks, Earthdirt 02:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you also unblock [[Image:Male genitalia reworked.jpg]] for the same page? Thanks Earthdirt 02:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Done. -- Cyde Weys 03:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

People from template
You recently changed the people from ... template "per cfd". Where will I find his discussion? Rjm at sleepers 09:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Can you be more specific (like with links?). I do lots of things. -- Cyde Weys 00:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:England people message Rjm at sleepers (talk) 08:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

See this discussion. Incidentally, the issue appears to be more muddled than when the resolution was posted to WP:CFDW. The "by settlement" suffix on the end of the category names does indeed seem unncessary, though. -- Cyde Weys 15:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Rjm at sleepers (talk) 15:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Godsmack
Hi, would you please talk some sense into User:Demantos. He is trying to merge Godsmack discography with Godsmack. Godsmack has enough music to warrent a seperate article for discography, and any substantially successful band has one on wikipedia. Please comment on his talk page, and comment here.

Thank you,

Skeeker &#91; Talk &#93; 01:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 10:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

User: Thirdman
Not really vandalism, but the user keeps on posting very short articles about villages in the UK that may/ or may not exist. The articles are around 1 sentence long and do not contain any information whatsoever except stating that the village is in "New Yorkshire." The User: Thirdman does not have a user page but does have a talk page. I have put up a few for deletion but there are so many short articles that I can't all put up for deletion as it probably take me a day, so maybe you can do it for me. Or even better you could delete it is you feel it does not meet the criterea for a good article. Thanks Fattyjwoods (talk) 03:20, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Unsuccessful nominees to the United States Supreme Court
Hello. The logs show that in February you deleted as per Categories for discussion/Log/2007 February 5. Then in June, a DRV overturned the decision as per Deletion review/Log/2007 June 9. Just curious, but why did you re-delete the category this week? Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 17:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Ditto for --Kralizec! (talk) 17:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Well here's your problem. I'm not sure why he was snooping around in months-old CFD pages, but he didn't see the DRV. -- Cyde Weys 17:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia images
Last year you deleted "Wikipedia images" which redirected to "Wikipedia:images." This is a useful redirect since many (most?) Wikipedians won't know the "colon" syntax to access special Wikipedia pages. Why did you remove it? Happywaffle (talk) 01:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

cydebot
is a shits —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.93.88.35 (talk) 06:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging
Hello! Please have your bot stop changing the tag for. Town seals are not subject to copyright. Thanks! Sahasrahla (talk) 09:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:WPZW
Hi there. Cydebot keeps editing this under the CFD protocol. I can understand this, however, the edits made have an impact on our statistics and it is messing up Wikiproject Zimbabwe and Rhodesia. Please could a compromise be made so that the edits made do not affect our Wikiproects. Many thanks Mangwanani (talk) 15:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Robot - Moving category 1980 television program debuts to 1980 television series debuts per CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 December 14.)
"The Fact's of Life" debuted in 1979 not 1980. The first episode aired on August 24, 1979. You categorized it's television series debut link incorrectly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bps8876 (talk • contribs)
 * Cydebot didn't add the category originally, it just updated what was already there. Here is where the 1980s category was entered.  The bot just renamed it.  Metros (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging
Hello! Your bot is still changing the tag for. Town seals are not subject to copyright. Please find a way for this to stop. Reverting it each day is becoming tiresome. Sahasrahla (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Why do you say town seals are not subject to copyright? Many town seals are, in fact, copyrighted. But ignoring that, if this seal isn't copyrighted, then it should not be tagged with seal, because that template is for tagging non-free images. -- Cyde Weys 20:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging
Please provide examples of copyright town seals. I work in municipal government, and have never come across a town which had actually coprighted its seal (nor more than a handful of towns with a seal designed recently enough to qualify for copyright). I would be interested to research to see how towns are managing to do this, and the processes they went through. Sahasrahla (talk) 22:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arabcartoon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Arabcartoon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Seal of Freetown, Massachusetts.gif
Please stop your bot edit warring on this page. The user is right. Per Non-free content/templates the correct template to change to is non-free seal, not non-free logo. -Nard 21:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I've modified the bot's working file to change it to Non-free seal. But that user's reversions are still incorrect, because he's reverting to a redirect. -- Cyde Weys 03:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect editing by Cydebot
Please look at this edit which took out too many line breaks, moving a heading up to be immediately after an inline comment and not functioning as a heading - you'll see what I mean. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Error in template renaming of non-free content templates
Please see this diff --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 10:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. That used to be redirected to the fair use template, but then it was deleted, and then finally recreated as pointing to something else. -- Cyde Weys 22:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Curiosity
In this edit, your bot added "Category:Main pages with misplaced talk page templates" to the page, and I was curious why it did that. (Technically that category is automatically added when a template is misused on article page.) - Penwhale &#124; Blast him / Follow his steps 13:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008
The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 13:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)