User talk:Cymru.lass/Archive 6

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
== RE: Your "Fixing use of a template instead of a magic word, replaced: → " edits ==

Hi there,

I noticed that you've made these edits and it seems like you've finished more or less doing them, but it looks like you manually did the task using AWB. For future reference, my bot, User:Thehelpfulbot is able to carry out automated find/replace tasks so you don't have to press save every few seconds.

If you have another task that requires essentially find/replace, feel free to let me know and I'd be happy to help! :)

Hope this helps,

The Helpful  One  17:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * That actually would've saved me a lot of time... That was helpful, Helpful! (No bad pun intended.) It probably would've saved me a lot of time >.< — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Heh, no problem! It's a shame you didn't edit my talk page archives earlier in the task run (that's how I found you), else I would have been able to sort it out for you! :) Thanks, The  Helpful  One  23:26, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, that's what you get for having a username so low on an alphabetized list :P I shall let you know in the future if I need any more massive find-and-replace-ness:) — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk •contribs) 23:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Heh, feel free! :) Also, you "preceding signed comment" tricked me out - I was going to tell you to use signatures :P The  Helpful  One 23:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Good, it's doing its job! A lot of people, myself included, get superfurstrated by new users who don't sign their edits, so my sig is both a self-reminder and a mini-awareness-raiser that it may take a while for new users to understand the signing system on here — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Paddy and Wheat seed Producers, Private Limited Companies and Individual/single Farmer owned companies.
Hi there, I was first of all surprised to see the in-depth vertical scaling of directory structure of Agriculture in India since you own the section, Kindly allow me to contribute to the further refined scaling of structure as well as content published by Govt. of India sources(dept.) and rich content of growing as well established companies already operational in India, looking forward to your prompt response...

kind regards,

Anandvip (talk) 08:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC) Anandvip

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:46, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

About your Admin Coaching request
Last visit was 1-31-10

Danger: alert page unnoticed
The Outline of relationships was nominated for deletion.

It was then overhauled and the nomination was withdrawn.

Before → After.

Only a couple members from the Outlines WikiProject showed up at the AfD.

Do you have WikiProject Outlines/Article alerts watchlisted?

If not, please watchlist it.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 09:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:53, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Meta
Per request, m:WM:SBL. Courcelles 11:00, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

The Cutting Edge: Fire & Ice
In regard to the copyright violation in this article, please note that the original article creator was not the person who added the copyright violation. That was done by another editor a few months later. I have reverted the article to a non-violating version, notified the article who added the copyvio, and struck out the warning to the article creator. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for marking my creation of a Sandbox Template for Speedy Deletion
It's like my 3rd day now, and I created the Sandbox Template (of course accidentally) on my first day while trying to use My Sandbox to test stuff so I wouldn't do anything globally stupid (like create a global Sandbox Template where one shouldn't exist). Sorry!

I spent some time thereafter trying to learn all about how to delete pages, but when I went back and started looking at stuff, to start trying to figure it out, I saw repeated messages that a bot was repeatedly clearing the Sandbox. I assumed this meant that my f'up had been cleared fixed -- Never occurred to me that I was the reason that the bot kept repeatedly trying to clear the Sandbox every two seconds. I assure you, if I'd realized I was doing something like that, I'd have tried to find some way to fix it -- but again, I thought the bot cleared sandbox message meant the problem had been fixed.

Anyways, how it happened could happen to others (if they're as dumb as me and don't always read and follow instructions completely) so, since I still haven't really got a clue what I'm doing yet, if you don't mind I'll explain it to you and maybe you can, or know someone who can, make sure it doesn't happen to someone else.

I was at, I think it was the global Sandbox page, and it had instructions something kinda like "...to create your own sandbox click here . You can create a link to your personal sandbox on your user page by adding the code  ". Being an idiot, I didn't read the message thoroughly and instead just added the link to my user page without first clicking the here to actually create my personal Sandbox page. I then went to my newly revised user page and clicked on the 'My Sandbox' link which took me to a page that said it was the Sandbox (obviously the Global Sandbox template and not my personal Sandbox), but having never seen a Wiki Sandbox before, it looked pretty good to me, and besides, what harm could I do... I was in the Sandbox. Anyways, I saw a 'Create' link where other pages usually said 'Edit' so I created & Saved. After saving I realized that I had done something bad in the Global Sandbox, so I looked for a 'Delete' button, link, etc; then I looked for a 'Help' button, link, etc; then I started searching about deleting pages and got into the meriad of WP:YouNameIt_Protocols for every type of deletion, etc.  It was after starting to read some of these dozens of pages that I went back and saw that a bot was auto clearing stuff and I figured my goof had been auto-fixed; whew!

Anyways... whatever page it is that tells users to click here . and then tells them they can add a link to access their personal Sandbox, should be much, much, much   more clear about the fact that the user must first click here  or all hell will break loose. I seriously hope I didn't mess things up too badly (I think I'll consider just creating an 'Oops!' tagline); but maybe you could (or you know who else to mention this situation to who could) clarify the instructions on that page that has the directions about creating the link. Thanks! (I very sincerely promise to try really really hard not to f anything else up (at least for a while, but hopefully not for a long time)). -- Who R you? (talk) 04:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Templates for deletion
I'm not sure if you realise this, but adding a tfd tag a template does not automatically list it for deletion...  Night  w   12:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry, took you for a noob! ;) China-header  Night  w   22:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Aviation accidents and incidents in 2011
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Aviation accidents and incidents in 2011. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasonedconsensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

inre User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines
You are cordially invited back to User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines as I feel it going live is imminent and I value additional eyes and input. Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Citing sources
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Citing sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

It would be nice to have you visit
...this discussion.  Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Requests for bureaucratship threshold
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Requests for bureaucratship threshold. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:WikiProject Animals/Draft capitalization guidelines
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:WikiProject Animals/Draft capitalization guidelines. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 04:05, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Research into the user pages of Wikipedians: Invitation to participate
Greetings,

My name is John-Paul and I am a student with the University of Alberta specializing in Communications and Technology.

I would like to include your Wikipedia user page in a study I am doing about how people present themselves online. I am interested in whether people see themselves in different ways, online and offline. One of the things I am looking at is how contributors to Wikipedia present themselves to each other through their user pages. Would you consider letting me include your user page in my study?

With your consent, I will read and analyze your user page, and ask you five short questions about it that will take about ten to fifteen minutes to answer. I am looking at about twenty user pages belonging to twenty different people. I will be looking at all user pages together, looking for common threads in the way people introduce themselves to other Wikipedians.

I hope that my research will help answer questions about how people collaborate, work together, and share knowledge. If you are open to participating in this study, please reply to this message, on your User Talk page or on mine. I will provide you with a complete description of my research, which you can use to decide if you want to participate.

Thank-you,

John-Paul Mcvea

University of Alberta

jmcvea@ualberta.ca

Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Cymrus.lass!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Mystery
Please solve this mystery if you can...

On September 23rd, traffic to Portal:James Bond doubled, and has stayed at the new level since then. I can't figure out what happened.

See http://stats.grok.se/en/201109/Portal%3AJames_Bond

Traffic to Outline of James Bond stayed the same (though it was at the higher-level already), which leads me to suspect changes made somewhere in Wikipedia.

See http://stats.grok.se/en/201109/Outline%20of%20James_Bond

I'd like to find out what happened, in case it reveals helpful link placement tips that can double the traffic to outlines too!

I look forward to your reply. The Transhumanist 22:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Please help fill in annotations at Portal:Contents/Outlines
Please go to Portal:Contents/Outlines' and fill in as many missing annotations as you can, even if it's only one or two. Every little bit helps!

The annotating of the entries on Portal:Contents/Outlines is nearing completion.

Annotated entries look like this:


 * Basketball – team sport in which two teams of five players try to score points by throwing or "shooting" a ball through the top of a basketball hoop while following a set of rules.
 * Canoeing and kayaking – two closely related forms of watercraft paddling, involving manually propelling and navigating specialized boats called canoes and kayaks using a blade that is joined to a shaft, known as a paddle, in the water.
 * Cricket – bat-and-ball team sport, the most popular form played on an oval-shaped outdoor arena known as a cricket field at the centre of which is a rectangular 22-yard (20.12 m) long pitch that is the focus of the game.
 * Martial arts – extensive systems of codified practices and traditions of combat, practiced for a variety of reasons, including self-defense, competition, physical health and fitness, as well as mental and spiritual development.

Entries needing annotations look like this:


 * Industry – 
 * Construction –
 * Architecture –
 * Machines –
 * Industrial machinery –
 * Robotics –
 * Mining –

The links to the country outlines don't need annotations (they are listed by region).

Even if all you can do is one or two, the support will be greatly felt. Many hands make light work.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 00:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Community portal
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Community portal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and isnot a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Citing sources
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Citing sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and isnot a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensusposition, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 00:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and isnot a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:17, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and isnot a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Falafel
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTalk:Falafel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and isnot a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensusposition, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasonedconsensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:16, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (companies)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (companies). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasonedconsensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Citing sources
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Citing sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and isnot a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Article titles
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Article titles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marchmont Observatory
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Marchmont Observatory. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 18:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Kim Jong-nam
I've just reverted your addition to the above article. No reliable sources have yet confirmed that Kim Jong-Un has taken over from his father; it's widely reported that he is expected to take over, but not one source I can find states that he has taken over. Let's not jump the gun here; it's quite possible verging on likely that something unexpected will happen, if it hasn't already. Let's wait until reliable sources can confirm that what was expected to happen actually did happen. --NellieBly(talk) 04:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Tool apprenticeship
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Tool apprenticeship. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 19:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Inappropriate person/sandbox


A tag has been placed on Template:Inappropriate person/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk •contribs) 23:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Oh, please
RFC guidelines require "a brief, neutral statement of the issue" (emphasis is not mine). The alternative to editing the RFC to make it neutral would have been removing it and making Esoglou file again, which would have been tedious for everyone involved. –Roscelese (talk ⋅contribs) 19:37, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with changing the statement for the RfC by striking the other guy's comment and adding a new statement, or just replacing it entirely. What I'm not okay with is replacing the other guy's comment but leaving his signature. That's against Wikipedia policy. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 06:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I noticed afterwards that I'd forgotten to remove or change the signature, so I did so. Unfortunately, Esoglou restored his disruptive RFC text. –Roscelese(talk &sdot; contribs) 06:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Request
I want, if possible, to limit my reverting of Roscelese's revertings. I trust therefore that you will not mind attending to Roscelese's reverting of your edit.

The question for discussion is a relative one: In an article that contains the other two items that seem less important, is there any justification for deleting the information about Baudouin? Without the points of comparison, the question would be too abstract. Esoglou (talk) 20:49, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. Perhaps there is little that you can do.  I should not have bothered you with this request.  Esoglou (talk) 21:25, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

To Roscelese and Esoglou
User:Roscelese and User:Esoglou, I have stuck both your comments and written my own neutral phrasing of the RfC. Now please set about to discussing the issue rather than arguing with each other, reverting each other and editing each others' comments. I hope the fact that the RfC statement has been worded by an unbiased 3rd party will allow you both to set about reaching a consensus. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 07:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, if we had reached a consensus there would be no need for an RFC, but unfortunately Esoglou is not content with the current consensus reached with input from a third party. :P Would you mind editing your comment slightly? There's a grammatical error in the first line, and Baudouin is deceased so he opposed, etc. OCD, you know.–Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 07:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahh. I didn't know he died. Don't even know who he is. Probably should, since my best mate from when I was 6 is a Belgian countess or duchess or something like that. Anyway... My condolences to the people of Belgium. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 07:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * "Opposed to"? :3 See, I'm not refactoring your comment. Yeah, apparently the current King of Belgium is Albert II. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 07:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear lord, what is wrong with me tonight?? I never make these mistakes XD I have had a college age reading level since 4th grade and I have never once made a you're/your goof or an its/it's/its' goof either... — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 07:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Cymru lass. One request for comment was enough.  Esoglou (talk) 08:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! I know firsthand discussion/debate about a subject about which one is passionate can quickly descend into argument :P — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 08:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you again. Since there has been unanimity by all minus one, perhaps it is now time to remove the RfC.  Esoglou (talk) 15:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool - notes and office hours
Hey guys! Another month, another newsletter.

First off - the first bits of AFT5 are now deployed. As of early last week, the various different designs are deployed on 0.1 percent of articles, for a certain "bucket" of randomly-assigned readers. With the data flooding in from these, we were able to generate a big pool of comments for editors to categorise as "useful" or "not useful". This information will be used to work out which form is the "best" form, producing the most useful feedback and the least junk. Hopefully we'll have the data for you by the end of the week; I can't thank the editors who volunteered to hand-code enough; we wouldn't be where we are now without you.

All this useful information means we can move on to finalising the tool, and so we're holding an extra-important office hours session on Friday, 6th January at 19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. If you can't make it, drop me a note and I'll be happy to provide logs so you can see what went on - if you can make it, but will turn up late, bear in mind that I'll be hanging around until 23:00 UTC to deal with latecomers :).

Things we'll be discussing include:
 * The design of the feedback page, which will display all the feedback gathered through whichever form comes out on top.
 * An expansion of the pool of articles which have AFT5 displayed, from 0.1 percent to 0.3 (which is what we were going to do initially anyway)
 * An upcoming Request for Comment that will cover (amongst other things) who can access various features in the tool, such as the "hide" button.

If you can't make it to the session, all this stuff will be displayed on the talkpage soon after, so no worries ;). Hope to see you all there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:04, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool - things to do
Hey guys! A couple of highly important things to do over the next few weeks:
 * We've opened a Request for Comment on several of the most important aspects of the tool, including who should be able to hide inappropriate comments. It will remain open until 20 January; I encourage everyone with an interest to take part :).
 * A second round of feedback categorisation will take place in a few weeks, so we can properly evaluate which design works the best and keeps all the junk out :P. All volunteers are welcome and desired; there may be foundation swag in it for you!

Regards, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool
Hey guys; apologies for the belated nature of this notification; as you can probably imagine, the whole blackout thing kinda messed with our timetables :P. Just a quick reminder that we've got an office hours session tomorrow at 19:00 in #wikimedia-office, where we'll be discussing the results of the hand-coding and previewing some new changes. Hope to see you there :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 20:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

office hours
Another notification, guys; Article Feedback Tool office hours on Friday at 19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office :). If you can't attend, drop me a note and I'll send you the logs when we're done. We're also thinking of moving it to thursday at a later time: say, 22:00 UTC. Speak up if that'd appeal more :) Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Requests for comment/F&aelig;
A request for comments has been opened on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you,MadmanBot (talk) 19:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Southern british house?
It would seem that others agree that Southern british house may be a hoax, nothing on Google whatsoever. Do you have any evidence to the contrary? CheersTheroadislong (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2012 (UTC)