User talk:CynicalCinephile

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Russell Hantz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. — cyberbot I NotifyOnline 02:33, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Chief Keef, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  STATic  message me!  19:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Influx Magazine, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 12:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Influx Magazine. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I NotifyOnline 19:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Influx Magazine, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I NotifyOnline 05:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Influx Magazine
Hi, I noticed that you removed the AfD template on this article a few times and as you have seen, this is such undesirable behavior that we even have a bot to automatically put back the template. If you continue doing this, you are going to find yourself blocked from editing. A much better approach would be to read about the AfD procedure and then participate in the debate, telling the community why you think the subject of the article is notable and why the article should be kept. If your arguments are good (and policy based), you'll find that most people who have !voted "delete" up till now, will readily be swayed to change that to "keep". In general here on WP, talking with people whom you disagree with is much more productive than edit warring. Hope this helps. --Randykitty (talk) 08:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lil Durk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avalon Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Montana of 300


A tag has been placed on Montana of 300 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Montana of 300. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 23:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Montana of 300. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. red dog<i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 23:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Montana of 300. ''You will be banned from edit or creating articles of you continue your disruptive behavior. Pleas stop.'' red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 23:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Montana of 300 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Montana of 300 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Montana of 300 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glo Gang


A tag has been placed on Glo Gang, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Compassionate727 (talk) 16:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ep, sorry. Some IP vandalized it. I have removed the tag and restored the redirect. Compassionate727 (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, I'm The1337gamer. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Gears of War because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The1337gamer (talk) 08:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of God, Guns & Automobiles


The article God, Guns & Automobiles has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Out of the <10 hits on ProQuest, all were trivial mentions in articles about other shows. Couldn't find any decent sourcing whatsoever"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:20, 14 May 2022 (UTC)