User talk:Cynthiacrane

Hi, please have a look at WP:AUTO concerning the article Cynthia Crane. Also, please do not write in all uppercase letters. --Aleph-4 17:55, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

fixed up article
Its actually acceptable to write your own article, but frowned on, as it doesnt usually get written well, (we are as humans oddly biased about ourselves). i have taken the liberty of fixing up your article to WP standards (at least as i understand them). i know you appreciate "standards". sorry to hear about your piano. my mother is from your generation and started to write music and play piano spontaneously, but not professionally, and its rejuvenated her life. Ill let her know about your music. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Cynthia Crane has been reverted. Your edit here to Cynthia Crane was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://matthewwells.typepad.com/rhapsod/2010/01/berating-bernie.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IMPOSSIBLE RAGTIME THEATER


A tag has been placed on IMPOSSIBLE RAGTIME THEATER requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 15:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Headshot by the wonderful Heather Sullivan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Headshot by the wonderful Heather Sullivan.jpg, which you've attributed to Heather Sullivan. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Cynthia Crane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cynthia Crane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cynthia Crane until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cynthia Crane
Your recent edits to Cynthia Crane adding external links seem to violate the guideline on external links a huge mass of external links, some for reliable sources, some not, none identified, is not helpful to the reader. Please don't do this again. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Also, you have an apparent conflict of interest and it would really be better if you didn't edit the article directly, instead making edits on the talk page. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)