User talk:Cynulliad3

Welcome!
Hello, Cynulliad3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 11:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Amccann421. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Borderline personality disorder, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amccann421 &#160; (talk) 00:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Amccann421, this editor is not a newbie, despite appearing so to the naked eye. I am watching the Borderline personality disorder article, though. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Really, Cynulliad, I don't see why you feel the need to keep changing accounts. You should stick to one. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Is it possible,, that you edited as User:Motivação}} until three weeks ago? In your recent edits to [[United States you seem, as Cynulliad3, to be exhibiting behavior and edits similar to that of Motivação on this article back in November. You seem to be headed toward an edit war, in more that one article, in ways that are very similar to the road Motivação took that led to a block. If you are the same editor, you should realize that revisiting the same articles with problematic behavior, under a different user name is going to get you in deeper trouble. — Neonorange (talk) 03:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * you seem to be involved in an edit war at China and at United States. Your persistent changes have been reverted by several editors, and your edit summaries have become border-line uncivil. A discussion has been opened at Talk:United States, but you have ignored the discussion and continued to edit war. Please engage in discussion, avoid intemperate edit summaries, and stop edit-warring. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. There are policies in place to make building an encyclopedia possible. — Neonorange (talk) 04:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but what is the point of this and this? GABgab 18:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at United States shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''A talk page exists. Take it there!'' Callmemirela  🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  20:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
GABgab 21:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)