User talk:Cyphernormie

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bismuth Protocol (August 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Newystats were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bismuth Protocol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Bismuth_Protocol Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Newystats&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bismuth_Protocol reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Newystats (talk) 04:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Greetings. I sincerely disagree with this decision based on the fact that there are countless entries in Wikipedia where this rule does not apply. Those conditions are simply not met in most cases. But I know that my opinion matters not and the substance of Wikipedia as a free and public encyclopedia has changed dramatically over the past years into an opressive, censoring, gatekeeping platform centered around political correctness and elitism among moderators. Bismuth has academic presence - if that's not enough for you as in-depth, reliable, secondary, independent reference, then it only solidifies my point. How many articles on wikipedia exactly do you have that link to academic publications? Perhaps I should involve a reference to some newspaper?
 * Best regards,
 * Jan Kucera Cyphernormie (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * And of course you need to keep the conditions vague as possible so you can deny Wikipedia presence at will. That's abusive, authoritarian and fascist. I am simply stating fact here, I am not personally attacking you or being rude or assuming bad faith. Enjoy your day.
 * Best regards,
 * Jan Kucera Cyphernormie (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)