User talk:Cypriot Chauvinist

February 2020
Hello, I'm GreenMeansGo. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. G M G talk  16:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. G M G talk  20:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Cyprus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr.  K.  20:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Dr.  K.  20:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cyprus. Praxidicae (talk) 20:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. --John B123 (talk) 16:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 15:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Turkish invasion of Cyprus. Dr.  K.  11:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a WP:AIV. As predicted by User:Ponyo in this edit, an indef block was likely. The question was whether you would be able to edit 'collaboratively and productively'. Clearly the answer is no. EdJohnston (talk) 17:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla I have tried to resolve disputes by going on talk pages in fact I resolved one with John B123 recently and that was put behind but when people refuse to listen to facts its impossible to do anything. Its good to see though how misinforming wikipedia really is and how you have an agenda against my country. I honestly couldn't care less right now about unblocking me or not, your admins ought to be ashamed of themselves. A country is not a debate and a fact is not a debate either. Besides that, it takes more people not to engage in an edit war not 1 person. I have made this public to my following on social media though and I couldn't care less whether its 1000 people or 1 million, the incredible bias is beyond stunning.

Block
So your argument against me is that I write too much about a topic I know? Isnt that the point of wikipedia, to share your knowledge on subjects? Besides you say I only write warnings to other editors, but I have clearly writtent before what I am doing but people still change it. Please tell me 1 logical way an edit war can be avoided when, if you do try talking it out, they dont listen. Cypriot Chauvinist (talk) 07:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You should read policy on edit warring, which includes advice on how to address an editing dispute. 331dot (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

^Actually helpful thank you.

is open. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC) is closed. Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Cypriot Chauvinist. Noting checkuser block and WP:CBAN. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 19:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

is closed. Note further ban evasion via in September, 2023. --Yamla (talk) 12:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)