User talk:Cyrej

Your draft article, Draft:Alignment layer


Hello, Cyrej. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alignment layer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

A goat for you!
Thanks for your contributions to physics articles/talk pages.

SpiralSource (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC) 

Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notice
Newimpartial (talk) 12:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages
Hi Cyrej, In case you'd not come across it before, I thought I'd message to ask whether there are any wikipedia articles that you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and submitting for external, academic peer review.

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

Note that we do have to publish under real names, so if you don't want your real name associated to your username, you may have to choose atopic that your username has not previously edited.

Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors).

All the best, T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 23:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Verifiability does not require 119 authors
Thanks for adding citations, but including 119 authors of a work, as you did in this edit at Transgender, does not enhance WP:Verifiability and is in no way helpful to the article. Thank goodness only one author is visible in the References, as it would really encumber the rendered page if they were all there. As it is, the only encumbrance is to editors trying to find their way through that thicket in the wikicode. Can you delete, say, the last 116 of them, and let them just be "et al" in the citation? Anyone really interested in the name of author 87 or author 105 can click through and look them up; this is in no way helpful to the article. That said, thanks again for using citations; it's more important to get them in there in the first place, and going overboard with it is secondary, compared to that. Mathglot (talk) 10:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)


 * @Mathglot Sorry, mobile edit, could not access the auto-reference tool or easily search for previous occurrence.  Copied the reference from WPATH-SOC 8 article, which is then affected by the same problem. CyreJ (talk) 10:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Understood. Any objection if I snip it down to 3 authors? Mathglot (talk) 10:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see you've already simplified it; thanks much! (I fixed the other article likewise.) Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 11:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)