User talk:CyrilThePig4

CyrilThePig4/Sandbox
I've moved CyrilThePig4/Sandbox to User:CyrilThePig4/Sandbox since I think you intended to create the page in user space, given its title. If you don't think it should have been moved, let me know, but it can always be moved into mainspace once you finish the article and give it a title. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 15:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

And for the record, your four reversions within 24 hours are (1),  (2),  (3) and  (4). Jpatokal (talk) 15:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

HVP
Have you considered merging Hydrolyzed protein with acid-HVP? It certainly makes sense as the acid-HVP is simply a production method of hydrolyzed protein and the acid-HVP is still identified as hydrolyzed protein. --Calibas (talk) 21:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

What is Chemical Warfare?
Hello, CTP4;

I do not think your last contribution to Chemical Warfare was a valid improvement of the article. "chemical" warfare means warefare in order to incapacitate or kill people (see: OPCW web site). I don't think that "herbicidal warfare" qualifies as a subchapter to this article. Please, answer to my comment here. Greetings, Lost Boy (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


 * The article already states
 * Between 1961 and 1967 the US Air Force sprayed 12 million US gallons of concentrated herbicides, mainly Agent Orange...etc etc. The US Air Force is a tool of warfare and Agent Orange is a chemical. CyrilThePig4 (talk) 17:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Armenian Genocide reparations
Well done and thank you. -- PBS (talk) 22:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you for the work on the article. However, the things you removed in the historical background section are not included in the Armenian Genocide article. I think it is worth keeping them. -- Davo88 (talk) 22:46, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes I will accept the thanks for effort, not necessarily achievement. I have no prob with the info being reinserted within the colabrative editing process (or I will get round to it myself in a bit) and I still need to engage with User:Aregakn ...and add a bit to the talk page...and... CyrilThePig4 (talk) 22:59, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Personal attacks
There are already 2 but I hope these will be your last personal attacks. I hope this is clear Aregakn (talk) 20:38, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Alan Hill
Disambiguation by year of birth is standard practice for footballers. Regards, GiantSnowman 19:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Mendicity Oyster Sauce.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Mendicity Oyster Sauce.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Stephen Tennant.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stephen Tennant.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

1,2-dimethyl-benzene (ortho-xylene) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1,2-dimethyl-benzene (ortho-xylene). Since you had some involvement with the 1,2-dimethyl-benzene (ortho-xylene) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DMacks (talk) 16:39, 4 November 2018 (UTC)