User talk:Cyrius01

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Recreated article
You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Lindsay Peters
Hi there. Please note, wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and cannot contain original research. Any claims that are dispute need to be verified by reliable sources. As such, I've removed some comments from the above article. Feel free to add them back if you find sources for them. (And can make them neutral). I should also probably add that a candidates webpage is usually not considered to be a reliable souce, as it tends to be biased. Your best bet would be to use independent reporting. Best, -- B figura (talk) 04:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)