User talk:Cyrus73

The article "Search for sanity" has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. NawlinWiki 14:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not recreate this article unless you can indicate how or why the subject is notable. Please be aware that Wikipedia strongly discourages people from writing about themselves or their own projects. Also, Wikipedia does not accept articles about games that have not been released yet unless other external sources have written about them. FreplySpang 16:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to "Evil days of Luckless John":
Your recent edit to "Evil days of Luckless John" (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism or link spam to the page. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 11:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, I noticed you removed the speedy deletion tag on the article "Evil days of Luckless John". I am guessing you want to use this to try things out? Well why not create a sandbox? This will be in your userspace (so it's unlikely anyone will find it). Just start this page (User:Cyrus73/sandbox) and you can test things out. Alternatively you can use the snadbox but that will be edited by other people so your tests might be undone. If you want any help just ask me by editing my talk page. James086Talk 11:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

December 8
Please do not recreate deleted articles, such as "Search for sanity", without at least attempting to explain why they are notable. --Onorem 13:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

re:Creating a clist of contents
I presume you mean a list of contents that appears on virtually every page? (like the way Maserati MC12 has contents starting with "1 Development") Don't worry about it. It makes itself once there are 4 sections (I think it's 4). Wikipedia is great in that respect hey? If that's not what you meant then ask again. James086Talk 14:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop reposting this article about a game that isn't even finished yet, or you are likely to be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki 15:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

What kind of external sources do you want to let me speak about the unfinished game? I've already got some links. Would you like previews, interviews or something else?Cyrus73
 * We would like you to wait until the game has actually been published and has proved to be notable. If so, someone else will write the game up for you here. -- RHaworth 19:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I thought this preview I have given a link to would be enough to make SFS notable.

Cyrus73

re:Search for Sanity
Your article has been deleted, (I can tell from the comments further up this page) because it seems the subject wasn't notable. When you make an article, it should be sourced with links to websites (or books, newspapers etc.) so people can tell that it is factually correct, and notable. The notability guidelines say that it should have some published works (from people not involved in the project) used as references. I'm not sure (because I didn't see your article) but I'm guessing it didn't meet these criteria. Also (this policy is still in development) see computer and video games notability guidelines. James086Talk 03:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Dreep
A tag has been placed on Dreep, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 65.188.142.186 09:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent review here.  Rockpock  e  t  09:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I haven't done it. It must be some kind of mistake. Cyrus73
 * Remember that administrators have access to logs that you cannot see. According to the Dreep deletion log:


 * At 06:43, 30 December 2006 . . Cyrus73 (Talk | contribs | block) (←Created page with 'Image:Dreep.jpg')
 * At 11:08, 30 December 2006 RHaworth (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Dreep" (content was: 'Image:Dreep.jpg' (and the only contributor was 'Cyrus73'))
 * At 01:55, 31 December 2006 . . Cyrus73 (Talk | contribs | block) (←Created page with 'Image:Dreep.jpg')
 * At 01:57, 31 December 2006 Rockpocket (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Dreep" (CSD A3 no content)


 * Are you suggesting the software incorrectly logged you as creating the page when it was actually someone else (even though the content was exactly the same as when you previous created it?) Rockpock  e  t  10:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on "Funky Duck", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Chris 73 | Talk 10:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

It's not blatant advertising, it's just a badly-styled article. I'll improve and post it again later. Cyrus73.

A tag has been placed on Funky Duck, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Chris 73 | Talk 13:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC) What do you need to prove Funky Duck's notablity? Cyrus73

October 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? J.K.Rowling has mentioned that Dumbledore's homosexuality was just an element from many fanfics, I've also added other sources saying he's not a gay. It was not vandalism but ascertaining of the fact. Cyrus73 12:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You are either misreading the sources, or just vandalizing intentionally. Given your edit history, I think it's more likely to be the latter.  So stop.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Rowling has stated "Dumbledore homosexuality" idea was from the fan fiction. What's the matter? Cyrus73 13:03, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, she didn't say that. Your BBC source doesn't say that.  All she said was, "Oh, the fan fiction," referring, in context, to her opinion that this revelation will result in people writing fan fiction about a gay Dumbledore.  I am going to assume that you misunderstood what you read, and are not intending to maliciously misrepresent her words, even though you did falsify the title of the article in your edit. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't falsify it, I just tried to explain the main idea of it - how I understood it. Yes, I've just checked it and learned I has misunderstood it. Thanks for noticing. --Cyrus73 13:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)