User talk:Cyrus noto3at bulaga/Archive 4

Up to 18 discussions. Archive 4: noto3at

I would like to propose that the recipients section be standardised such that for all candidiates who are not eligible, only living past awardees are shown. Do feel free to give your opinions.
I would like to propose that the recipients section be standardised such that for all candidiates who are not eligible, only living past awardees are shown. Do feel free to give your opinions. 115.66.245.50 (talk) 03:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)s

Your contributed article, The Wild(Album)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The Wild(Album). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Wild (album). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Wild (album) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Robert McClenon, I am not created it. -- cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! ( Talk  |  Contributions ) 02:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It appears that Twinkle became confused in notification. It appears that you moved the page to correct its title, and the author then created another copy of it.  One of the two copies should be deleted.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Sattvata Samhita
I've declined your CSD nomination of Sattvata Samhita. While it's clear the page doesn't belong in the encyclopedia, it's equally clear it isn't a test page. ~ Rob 13 Talk 06:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sri Viswanatha Gopalakrishna Sastry
Hello Cyrus noto3at bulaga, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sri Viswanatha Gopalakrishna Sastry, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: the title of Mahamahopadhyaya indicates importance. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you.  So Why  11:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Scott Guberman
Hello Cyrus noto3at bulaga, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Scott Guberman, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: being in a band with a notable musician indicates significance. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you.  So Why  06:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nominations
Please stop nominating pages for speedy deletion until you have more experience here and show a better understanding of our policies and guidelines. this is an incorrect A1 tag (the article made it very clear what it was about, and with the bluelinked actor had a claim to notability as well). It also was a too fast A1 tag, you need to give people some time to expand an article even if it hadn't been clear what the subject was (which was clear from the start in this case).

Similarly, this was a probably worse A1 tagging. The article was very clear what it was about, and had a very good source to support it. This should never be tagged for speedy, and certainly not for A1.

As has been said above, this was also incorrect. A musician playing and touring with multiple notable artists is a claim to importance. It may be that this article needs deletion, but then it will be through an AfD discussion, but not a speedy. Fram (talk) 10:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Bear Brand Swak Pack in Makati.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Bear Brand Swak Pack in Makati.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Tang drink in southside makati.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Tang drink in southside makati.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nesfruta


The article Nesfruta has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No credible claim of significance with no references and no independent coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Sunsilk logo old.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sunsilk logo old.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Joy Ultra logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Joy Ultra logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 09:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Good Game crew
The edit I made to the Good Game producers list is based on the official crew list at the show's website here: http://www.abc.net.au/tv/goodgame/about/crew.htm Which lists Eliot Fish as the show's Series Producer - essentially the show runner. It makes sense to list him under the producers. This was not vandalism. Thanks.

Thanks. I am see the extenal markup to vandal but it was not. -- cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! ( Talk  |  Contributions ) 02:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nesfruta logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nesfruta logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

TR6 Edits
All edits were explained. My restore of your revert adds additional clarification. Any questions, just ask - Don't revert. Yours, 24.61.220.85 (talk) 02:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes boy. -- cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! ( Talk  |  Contributions ) 02:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your vigilance, User:Cyrus noto3at bulaga. Have a nice day.  Yours, 24.61.220.85 (talk) 02:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Doteli Wikipedia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doteli Wikipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Doteli Wikipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jc86035 (talk) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 15:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I am IP 174.19.155.239, or as you might better know, the one whose change to the Barbie (film series) article "didn't seem constructive", and you encouraged me to leave a message on your talk page if I believed there was a mistake. That would be the case. My revision to the article was a single cosmetic change in the table formatting, which (at least on my computer and browser) made the entire page from that point on look much cleaner. Before the change, the Season 4 table was compressed to the stretched on to include the rest of the article, including the reference list and Barbie template. This was jarring, ugly, and unintentional. I had rationed that the edit that created the mishap had simply gone unnoticed, and I figured I would remove the error in the formatting. Your reversion of my edit reinstated the error, and my only thought as to why is that it has now disrupted is that on your setup, it appeared fine, and upon my revision, it had appeared wrong, but I checked on another computer with a different OS and browser, and it appeared the same as it did before on mine. Unless I seem to be missing something, I believe the revert to be unwarranted and likewise, should be reverted to my original edit. 174.19.155.239 (talk) 04:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * IP: I've undone the unexplained revert. Thank you for fixing that article. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Hālaliʻi Lake
Hello Cyrus noto3at bulaga. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hālaliʻi Lake, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 03:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lotus 3-Eleven
You slapped a db-nocontext on Lotus 3-Eleven a minute after creation. Was it really not obvious what the article was about? And could you not have waited ten or fifteen minutes to let the editor add more content? Uncle Roy (talk) 08:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes Uncle Roy, I can't tag this page again. -- cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! ( Talk  |  Contributions ) 08:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Dr. Crabblesnitch
db-a7 applies to real people, not fictional characters. Please read WP:CSD carefully before you mark any more pages for deletion. Thank you. Uncle Roy (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Malaysia Global Chamber of Commerce (MGCC)
Which blocked/banned user? Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using  in your reply. 02:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Mgcc my has recently blocked, Ks0stm. -- cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! ( Talk  |  Contributions ) 02:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Ahh, gotcha! I blocked them because of a username violation; they created the page before they were blocked. CSD G5 is only for pages created by sockpuppets of blocked or banned users, so that doesn't qualify. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using  in your reply. 02:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, Ks0stm. -- cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! ( Talk  |  Contributions ) 02:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you patrol and place a maintenance tag in an article Wikipedia. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)