User talk:CzakNoris

April 2015
Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wykop.pl without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Dewritech (talk)  19:11, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wykop.pl with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Talk pages
Don't delete remarks from talk pages as you did at Talk:Wykop.pl and my talk page. Also don't refer to others as cockroaches. If you continue in this fashion you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

July 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eminem. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Rob van  vee  17:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Warning


If you will vandalize and change content on the page Polish language again you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia per WP:Vandalism rule. Oliszydlowski (talk) 01:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tommy Wiseau, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 01:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Tommy Wiseau. Thank you. Ionmars10 (talk) 01:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)