User talk:Czar/2023

Your GA nomination of Parents' Day (novel)
The article Parents' Day (novel) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Parents' Day (novel) for comments about the article, and Talk:Parents' Day (novel)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Urve -- Urve (talk) 04:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Czar!


Happy New Year! Czar, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 03:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 03:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Growing Up Absurd scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 16 February 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/February 16, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Trader Joe's unions
The article Trader Joe's unions you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trader Joe's unions for comments about the article, and Talk:Trader Joe's unions/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Sparticist uprising -- "bloody week"
I can't find any other source besides Schwartzwald that refer to the uprising as Bloody Week. There aren't any German hits on "blutige Woche" either, except for the Paris Commune, which is also where most of the English searches end up. I'm fairly familiar with the topic and the period through my reading and my translations from German Wikipedia articles, and I never saw any Bloody Week references while I was verifying sources and info. Because of that, I'd like to have your update reverted unless you have something else to back up the usage of the phrase. It's probably better left with the Paris Commune.

Thanks, GHStPaulMN (talk) 15:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * @GHStPaulMN Reichstag Bloodbath and Spartacist uprising both come to mind in case there's confusion from author/editors. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 15:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @Shushugah Sorry, but I don't quite understand your point. What's the connection between the Reichstag Bloodbath and the Sparticist uprising -- or for that matter to referring to the latter as the Bloody Week? And how would they clear up any confusion? GHStPaulMN (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @Shushugah It belatedly came to me what you mean, and I agree that there's unlikely to be confusion, but for a different reason -- that I don't think Bloody Week is at all a common way to refer to the Sparticist uprising, so it's simply not likely to come up. I still know of only the one use of the phrase, and after reading p. 288 in Schwartzwald with its rather inflammatory wording (that I would flag in Wikipedia for its tone), I have question marks in my head about how reliable a source it is. So again, unless you know of another source or sources, I don't think the update / redirect add any value and should be reverted. Your thoughts on my main point about the phrase not being common? Thanks, GHStPaulMN (talk) 22:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Let's move this to the article's talk page (Talk:Spartacist uprising) where it will be of better use to future editors. czar  02:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Interview request
Congrats again on another Good Article. I would be delighted if you answered some questions in Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/WikiProject report on WP:LABOR. The question about WP:ANARCHISM is one I had in special mind for you. Feel free to directly edit/add any questions as you see fit. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 18:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the ping. I'll take a look later this week. czar  03:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Bloody week redux
So have I figured this question out correctly? As part of a discussion on the use of semaine sanglante, the Révolte spartakiste de Berlin article was brought in because it has a single unsourced use of the phrase. That then led to the English Spartacist article, with the Schwartzkopf book – which isn't referenced by any other Wikipedia article – as the source for adding a bolded Bloody Week to it. That was where I stepped in as (quite possibly) the Wikipedia subject-matter expert on the Weimar Republic with the objection that one English language source and none in German isn't enough to raise Bloody Week to the level of a "synonym" for the Sparticist uprising. It simply isn't accurate and could be potentially misleading.

I plan to remove the Bloody Week reference in the Sparticist uprising article by Monday unless there's some stronger supoort for it somewhere that I don't know of. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Thanks. GHStPaulMN (talk) 12:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, the place for this discussion is on the article's talk page, for other editors' future reference. That's where I replied and where you should too. I supplied a panoply of sources in which it's known by this name. czar  15:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Spontaneous order into Self-organization
Depends on the extent of predict.ability. Suggest change from "weak oppose" to "medium oppose". 110.174.102.124 (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Self-organization is 'human race' based. It was the global destabilizing factor. Spontaneous order is "human kind" based. Turtle knows best. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.102.124 (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi 110.174, if you're looking to participate in that discussion, it's here: Talk:Self-organization czar  02:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

"Nabbit" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Nabbit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. (Note: Just the messenger, not the proposer.) --Super Goku V (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ilie Cătărău
The article Ilie Cătărău you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ilie Cătărău for comments about the article, and Talk:Ilie Cătărău/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ezlev -- Ezlev (talk) 04:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarket scanner moment
The article Supermarket scanner moment you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Supermarket scanner moment for comments about the article, and Talk:Supermarket scanner moment/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 05:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Good Job! It's a fun read. Panini!  • 🥪 16:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Parents' Day (novel)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Supermarket scanner moment
Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for writing this, I really enjoyed reading it.  78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 03:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Unsuccessful Kickstarter campaigns has been nominated for merging
Category:Unsuccessful Kickstarter campaigns has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Re: Talk page length
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a help me notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Those are talk page guidelines, not user talk guidelines, as noted in the section itself. User talk pages are up to the user. It's also 98kB prose, not 500kB. Those points aside, yes, I intend to clean it up and yes, a short, non-templated message without those details would have been a sufficicent reminder. czar  20:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

ANABRON (talk) 07:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Editor of the Week
User:Etriusus and User:Gog the Mild submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
 * I would like to nominate the amazing Czar to be Editor of the Week. This user is a long time editor and an admin to boot!! This is to recognize their instrumental work at WikiProject Anarchism and maintenance of the associated pages. Seriously, they do so much gnomish activity the project would hit a deadlock without them. Additionally, they have over 100 GA's and is always around to help others with their own GAs, asking for no recognition of their own. I believe they're a wonderful addition to the halls of EOTW and was genuinely floored when I didn't see the name already here. Czar generates a steady flow of high-quality FAs.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

Thanks again for your efforts! &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   21:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Rose Street Club
Hi CZAR, hope you flourish! I've got a small favour to ask (hopefully only small, don't go to town on it for your own sake of course!) A few (where does the time go!) years ago, you looked favourably on this article I'd just written. Now, five years later, I'm expanding it slightly and I wondered—very presumptuously—whether you could point me to any sources on the German Communist Workers' League, from which the club stemmed. Only I can't find a mention of it on the web/ books anywhere, and I'd like to say why it stemmed from it (presumably a factional split, of course, but RS). Maybe my search engine isn't picking up German language results? Any advice or pointers would be much appreciated! Best, SN54129  22:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey @Serial Number 54129, my quick answer is that I think it's the German Communist League (Bund der Kommunisten), which was active during the period that Cole is referencing. Figuring that he just used a non-traditional name, i.e., not to be confused with the Communist Workers' League of Germany (de:Kommunistischer Arbeiterbund Deutschlands; KAPD) of the 1970s, as Cole published this book in 1941. czar  05:57, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Knight Lore
Hello Czar, Retro Gamer is quite often unreliable and I've found it regularly publishes "facts" that turn out to be wrong. I've added the weekly chart places from Gallup and RAM/C to the talk page which easily disprove the false claim made by Martyn Carroll. Stooob (talk) 08:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Eternal War
Hello,

You recently merged Eternal War into another article.

I really think you should open up a discussion publicly on what the best move would be in these situations and you should notify the user upon doing it. We don't know each other. I have no way to know whether this was done in vandalism, was done in error or was done under bad faith. You may be wrong or you may be right on the merger. A simple talk page message could explain what's going on before it happens and prevent various issues. I've seen this same situation lead to people getting into fights over here and those situations were easily preventable.

Thanks.KatoKungLee (talk) 19:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @KatoKungLee, you can see my edit summary in the page's edit history to know that it is not vandalism or done in bad faith. You are welcome to revert and/or initiate a discussion about it per the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Alternatively, you can respond to an existing discussion, if you wish: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. czar  19:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * You are completely missing the point of their reply. You can't just do what you want and expect everybody to be okay with it. That's why they are suggesting you start opening public discussions before making random changes. Are you just Arms & Hearts' other account? 2600:1700:8140:29C0:FCFF:2A6D:9D30:5446 (talk) 20:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you read the linked discussion, you will see that this was far from unilateral. And even if it was, my other link explains how being bold for easily reverted actions is the norm rather than its opposite. I hope you'll take the time to read them since you're clearly interested in how Wikipedia works. czar  04:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Against All Authority
What do you mean there isn't a "policy" for keeping a list of compilation appearances? Are you going to go around to all 5,000,000 music artist pages and delete their compilation appearances as well? 2600:1700:8140:29C0:FCFF:2A6D:9D30:5446 (talk) 20:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * It was a giant unsourced list of compilation appearances. Wikipedia does not keep that kind of content. If it was a handful of reliably sourced compilation appearances, it wouldn't be an issue. czar  04:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Why do you keep editing Against All Authority's page with info that is not true? What is the deal with you and Arms & Hearts being so obsessed with changing the page? The edit in which you say that the band is not ska punk anymore is entirely incorrect. That is a statement that was made in 2001 after their punk album came out. They released a ska album in 2006, and have since been performing at many ska festivals. I'm not sure where you are sourcing your info from but I know firsthand about this information, and it was fine before you (or whoever) changed it for no apparent reason. The band is a fricking ska punk band - they have 2 horn players and ~80% of their songs have ska in them. 2600:1700:8140:29C0:390C:28FE:9062:9C01 (talk) 10:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

The effective wiping out of Inclusive Democracy entry and the arbitrary removal of private information about a living person biography
The way you effectively swiftly deleted an all-encompassing entry about Inclusive Democracy, a new political and theorerical project (despite the entries issues,mainly of morphological nature, which are not restricted to this entry of course) does not offer any room for its improvement by any other editor. Its merge with Takis Fotopoulos' entry for "space" reasons or so is unjustifiable and derogatory, as the entry was self-contained, is being widely used in social science, and is not the only work between the multitudes of output of the theorist. To add insult to the injury, the deletion of private data from Fotopoulos' personal biography that is by any standard difficult to be "externally verified" (although this data can be found in his short bio in his books etc.) seems totally over the top and could be taken as completely biased if not distorting editing about the work of a living person, grounded on sheer improvization and negative bias, something that one couldn't expect from an experienced editor. 2A02:1388:142:A167:C8ED:E944:20E1:A0F (talk) 00:56, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Similar username
Hi czar, hope you're doing well. I came accross. For a second I thought you changed your username or had a backup account. I don't know if the usernames are dissimilar enough, so I thought I'd better let you know. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Please undelete my article
I don’t understand why did you delete my article titled Garima Poddar. Garimapoddar123 (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Also see WP:Requests for undeletion. The article has not been deleted, only turned into a WP:REDIRECT. Jay  💬 10:38, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Garima, the article was redirected per consensus at this discussion: Articles for deletion/Garima Poddar. We require subjects to have significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources (?) to warrant a dedicated article on Wikipedia. We also recommend against creating articles about oneself, as a conflict of interest. czar  12:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Notice

 * 54 grammar mistakes are fixed. You can also provide some feedback directly to my talk page or here. Happy editing! The person who loves reading (talk) 02:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Czar, the above copy-edit has been marked Partly done; please see REQ talk for details. Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  07:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅; well it ain't perfect but it's better than it was! :)  Baffle☿gab  04:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dilar Dirik
Hello, Czar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dilar Dirik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Archive VIT5 talk
Would you please archive the closed proposals on Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/5? The page is extremely cluttered now. I'd do it myself if I knew how. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  11:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dilar Dirik


Hello, Czar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dilar Dirik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, Czar,
 * It's always strange to post these template messages on the talk pages of well-established editors. If you want to return to this draft, of course, you can restore it yourself. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

GA reviews in the database
Per my note at User talk:ChristieBot, here's what I have for you. Let me know if anything is missing.

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Could have sworn there were more but I didn't keep track so I have no means of verifying. The redirects list looks like places where I made the redirect but didn't necessarily participate in the review. czar  14:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Doomfist
I have tagged the article for lacking any updates. Thank you. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 13:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Peer review request for indie video game developer article
Hi Czar,

I'm looking for someone to do a peer review of the Jonathan Blow article I've been working on and off for the past two years. I saw that you were listed on WP:PRV under indie video games, hence this message!

Would you have time over the next couple of weeks to review it? The article came back from the WP:GUILD last month, so I'm now looking for someone who knows the standards when it comes to indie video game articles to give it a read. I'd like to submit it for WP:GAN it the coming months, so I'd like to know how to improve the article so that it meets GA standard.

Let me know if you're interested! Neuroxic (talk) 02:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I've added the article to the list at WP:PR Neuroxic (talk) 17:13, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

August 12 TFA
Hello. I was wondering if I could convince you to move La Salute è in voi as FTA to November 4 (Luigi's death). I've been planning to nominate elephant for that date as it is World Elephant Day. LittleJerry (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @LittleJerry, that's reasonable and I'd be open to that, but isn't Elephant a re-run? We try to run new articles over re-runs. czar  17:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Old FAs can, and are, re-run after 5 five years. Its been 10 years since elephant was on the main page. LittleJerry (talk) 18:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Nominations for August 12 are now open. Can I go ahead? LittleJerry (talk) 00:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Wrecking Ball (Overwatch) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wrecking Ball (Overwatch), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Wrecking Ball (Overwatch) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Doomfist for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doomfist, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Doomfist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Growing Up Absurd scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Growing Up Absurd article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 6, 2023. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page blurb, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/July 6, 2023, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. If you wish to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article, you can do so at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 2023.

I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Featured topic removal candidates/Asher Vollmer/archive1
Letting you aware of this review. GamerPro64 22:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Held v. Montana
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

TFA?
Hi czar. You listed La Salute è in voi at Potential TFAs for 12 August, but never actually nominated it. The 12th is now filled - with Elephant for World Elephant Day. I have tentatively scheduled La Salute è in voi for 27th August. Is this ok with you? Is there any other date in August you would prefer? Or would you rather it not run this August at all, given that the 12th is not available? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Gog the Mild, thanks for checking. Can we hold it for another date? I'll add it back to WP:TFAR. czar  03:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure, removed from August schedule. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

La Salute è in voi scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 27 August 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/August 27, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Strange edit to VIT5
Take a look at this edit by an SPA IP from yesterday. Should this be reverted? 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  14:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Yep. Since that list is maxed out, any further changes are meant to come by discussion, so if any controversial changes are made outside of discussion, you should feel free to revert it. Since it's the IP's sole edit, I wouldn't say they're necessarily a SPA but that doesn't change the circumstances for the revert either way. czar  18:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Mary J. Morgan auction
- I noticed you have a draft of a page for the Mary J. Morgan auction that you have not worked on since 2021. I am upgrading the J. H. Hobbs, Brockunier and Company page right now in my sandbox, and am including a paragraph on the Peachblow vase. If you ever finish the Mary J. Morgan auction page, I will definitely add a "main article" that links to your Mary J. Morgan auction page. TwoScars (talk) 20:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Oddity
I opted to close the discussion since, as the creator, you supported the merger. Would you care to perform the merge? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Park Jisung (NCT)
Hi i did up this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Jisung_(NCT) which was just a redirect to the group page, to a whole biography of the artist in mention. I included a lot of verified sources (as per. WP:KO/RS) but another user deleted everything and said I should clarify it with you instead. Are you able to assist? Intuivo (talk) 14:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Links: special:permanentlink/1169147187; Articles for deletion/Park Ji-sung (singer) was special:permanentlink/1038625204; User talk:Hyphenation Expert
 * , many of those sources aren't in WP:KO/RS. What makes them reliable? czar  03:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * == Stuck on what to do ==
 * Hi Czar thanks for responding! i meant the one i edited not the draft which was deleted in 2021.
 * Citations I listed:
 * 2. news.sbs is a news site under broadcasting station SBS
 * 4. news.kbs is listed as KBS Broadcasting in WP:KO/RS
 * 8. news.sbs is a news site under broadcasting station SBS
 * 9. chosun is listed as The Chosun Ilbo in WP:KO/RS
 * 11. naver is listed as Naver News in WP:KO/RS
 * 12. herald pop is listed as The Korean Herald in WP:KO/RS
 * 15. star news is listed as The star news in WP:KO/RS
 * 16. herald pop is listed as The Korean Herald in WP:KO/RS
 * 17. aju news is listed as Korea Economic Daily in WP:KO/RS
 * 19. asia today is listed as Asia Today Korea in WP:KO/RS
 * So these are some of the citations which are listed. Some of the other citations are archived official websites (primary sources). Intuivo (talk) 03:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * , the new draft is significantly different from the last draft that there are clear merits to revisiting the discussion. I'm restoring it but I advise to (1) remove the unreliable refs, and (2) add publisher info to each citation with links to the Wikipedia articles for each publications, so readers unfamiliar with Korean sources can learn more about their credibility. czar  03:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Czar, yes my apologies i didn't know the previous draft existed so i just did a page from scratch since i saw that the page was just a redirect. Noted on points 1 & 2! thank you so much! Intuivo (talk) 03:36, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Czar sorry i'm confused, so which link can i put my draft in now? the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Ji-sung_(singer) or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Jisung_(NCT) ? able to delete one of them and just keep the other page? Intuivo (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * , they've been centralized at Park Ji-sung (singer) with a common history if anyone needs to review across drafts. czar  03:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * got it thanks! Intuivo (talk) 04:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * got it thanks! Intuivo (talk) 04:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stage works of Paul Goodman
The article Stage works of Paul Goodman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stage works of Paul Goodman for comments about the article, and Talk:Stage works of Paul Goodman/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 12:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Zhemao hoaxes
Zhemao hoaxes has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ltbdl (talk) 14:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Growing Up Absurd
Quick question ... this is at WP:TFAP for October 21, but the word "October" doesn't appear in the article. Would October 19 work just as well for you? I've got articles on the schedule with anniversaries on the 21st and 20th. - Dank (push to talk) 03:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Dank, it's in footnote 38 so the 21st is its anniversary but October 19th should be fine. Thanks for asking and for your work coordinating TFAP. czar  14:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, missed the footnote. Okay, if that works for you, I'm guessing it would be harder to move either of the other two. Thanks for writing this ... I agree it's an important and (I think) overlooked work. - Dank (push to talk) 14:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC) P.S. Now the 18th. - Dank (push to talk) 20:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Structure of Literature
The article The Structure of Literature you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Structure of Literature for comments about the article, and Talk:The Structure of Literature/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 16:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:REFORDER" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:REFORDER&redirect=no Wikipedia:REFORDER] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  20:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

"Dynamic Island" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dynamic_Island&redirect=no Dynamic Island] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

TFA and Precious anniversary
Thank you today for Growing Up Absurd, introduced (in 2022): "While hardly a classic today, this book was once the bible of a generation, found on bookshelves across American college campuses during the 1960s counterculture as well as, years later, the cabin bookshelves of Ted Kaczynski. Growing Up Absurd was a paean to 1960s youth, written by a hopeful yet outcast intellectual finally finding his audience after a lifetime of striking out. Originally writing on the then-hot topic of rising juvenile delinquency, Paul Goodman defended the youth subculture that rejected adult society much as Goodman did himself, writing that youth had no business "growing up" into a world designed to process and spit them out, and that adults had better create a world of worthwhile ardor, with more meaningful work, honorable community, sexual freedom, and spiritual sustenance. Growing Up Absurd launched Goodman from the bohemian underground into a flash of idiosyncratic stardom in the twilight of his life, from lifelong impoverishment to the top tenth of American incomes, as he became a high-demand public intellectual namechecked in Annie Hall, a Dutch uncle to the counterculture and Berkeley Free Speech Movement, the philosopher of the New Left, and within only several decades, largely forgotten from American public consciousness."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Today, it's a place that inspired me, musings if you have time. My corner for memory and music has today a juxtaposition of what our local church choirs offer. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Automonopoli
Automonopoli has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Super Mario Clouds.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Super Mario Clouds.gif, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Quick Quokka [⁠talk • contribs] 11:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA review of How the Red Sun Rose
Hi Czar, this is Thomas. I wanted to thank you for dedicating your time to reviewing How the Red Sun Rose (it must've taken you a lot of time), and I'm sorry for my late response to your last collection of suggestions for improvement, as the time then coincided with the start of my new job, and then the start of school. I've tried my best to fix the problems you pointed out. Please point out anything that still needs improvement, and I'd be more than willing to address.

This is by far the GA review from which I've learned the most about Wikipedia, its policies, and content-writing in general. Thank you again, Thomas Meng (talk) 00:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Thomas Meng, glad to hear it! Hopefully it was positive for you and you'll get to pay it forward for another editor. :) Just a few comments left in the nomination for you. Looking forward to your future book articles. czar  15:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ivan Illich.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ivan Illich.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Ukiah area for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukiah area is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ukiah area until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of North Atlantic Rail for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Atlantic Rail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/North Atlantic Rail until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)