User talk:Czarnezcki

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 10mmsocket (talk) 12:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:International Intelligence Agency of Sponia


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:International Intelligence Agency of Sponia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

But it is not vandalism… i am extremely close to the organization and its members and i am not vandalising but just editing the page and doing my own business

If “they” want to take this to somewhere serious please contact my email at ThatGuyYouBlocked@Outlook.com

Thanks, Czarnezcki (talk) 12:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Assuming this is a real organization, please be aware that not all subjects - whether they are people, organizations, companies, products, etc. - are suitable for Wikipedia articles. They have to be notable subjects according to Wikipedia's definition of notability; in the case of an organization, it needs to meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. This means that the company/organization must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources.


 * If you are connected to an organization, then please be aware that writing about it is considered to be a conflict of interest. Wikipedia isn't interested in what organizations want to say about themselves; only what third-party sources have chosen on their own to publish about them. Readers expect plainly factual articles about notable topics, neutrally worded and reliably sourced, written independently of their subjects. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

we, havent even started editing the page and just added an infobox. Why should anyone think this is vandalism, and how is it vandalism if i created the page. Isnt it a bit petty deleting a page and blocking an account for a minor edit?, assuming wikipedia dosent depend completely on bots i think you understand that i did not vandalize the page and just did a minor edit. Are “they” doing this because i edited it one time without a reason? Czarnezcki (talk) 06:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

I am adding, i am not part of the organization in any way, i said “i am very close to the organization and members”. Which means i am just a writer writing about organizations and not a part of anything, i am aware about how conflict of interests work and is not hoaxing anything Czarnezcki (talk) 06:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)