User talk:Czeslawjaskiel

June 2013
Hello, I'm Malik Shabazz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Leon Feldhendler because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:22, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leon Feldhendler. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ''Please read the reply I left you on my Talk page. Thank you.'' — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at Leon Feldhendler shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''Please stop. I asked you to discuss your concerns on the article's Talk page, but you chose to edit war. Continuing in this vein will get you blocked.'' — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:13, 4 July 2013 (UTC)