User talk:Czsamu

Your submission at Articles for creation: AIP Labs (January 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AIP Labs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:AIP_Labs Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MarcGarver&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:AIP_Labs reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 12:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello Czsamu. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Czsamu. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 01:54, 15 March 2023 (UTC)


 * As a doctor I have been involved in the research project, I think the work is great and there is a place for it on the site, but I don't get paid for editing the wikipedia page, nor have I been instructed to do so, nor do I have a financial interest, as I work in a public university. What does that count for? Czsamu (talk) 02:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response, but either way Wikipedia should not be used for promotional activity. MrOllie (talk) 02:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Many University project is named on the Wikipedia page. At "The following are examples of large companies that have contributed to AI algorithms for use in healthcare:" many companys also mentioned. I don't quite understand the basis for one promotion and the other objective reporting. The point, I suppose, is the credible source, i quoted an independent research institute, and I have identified a university article, from Semmelweis, which is now in the top 250 universities in the world. Czsamu (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Be that as it may, at the very least you must declare your conflict of interest (COI), which clearly exists since you have been involved in this project yourself. I will post a message below with instructions. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Czsamu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:AIP Labs, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:AIP Labs


Hello, Czsamu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AIP Labs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  01:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)