User talk:Dƶoxar

Some editing suggestions
Please read the guidelines for when to mark edits as minor (what's this?). Note that you should not mark an edit as a minor edit when you are adding content to an article. Your additions of Ukranian examples are welcome (thanks!), but they are significant not minor changes.

I suggest that you check the results of your edit using the (Show preview) button before clicking on the (Save page) button. That way you can catch errors before making your edits public, and can avoid having a series of intermediate edits saved in the permanent history of the page.

—Coroboy (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Cherkassy. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cherkassy&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cherkassy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Toddy1 (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Barcelona in Champions league
Hi. I saw you removed green color for barcelona, but they have already qualified for the next round read here. QED 237  (talk)  21:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, somebody was distorted information about Barcelona's quantity of points. Thanks. --Dƶoxar (talk) 21:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

/ɦ/ in Ukrainian
Hello. This consonant is pharyngeal, so it must be linked to Voiced pharyngeal fricative in the consonant table. If you disagree about its place of articulation, first find a source that backs up your claim. Peter238 (talk) 11:50, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's disputable. For instance in Сучасна українська мова: Підручник. ред. О.Д. Пономарів, Київ, 2001, с. 21 this sound is classified as glottal (pharyngeal) and in Pugh, Press. Ukrainian A comprehensive grammar, 1999, p. 23 as just glottal.--Dƶoxar (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Good to know! Thanks. Peter238 (talk) 18:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Anatoli Prokopenko
Hi, I saw your edit on Viktor Prokopenko. I was wondering if you had any information concerning Anatoli Prokopenko. Are you completely certain that they are two different people? Elspamo4 (talk) 20:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I've made this conclusion based on the Prokopenko statistics. No reliable source I've seen proves that he has worked with Qatar, so if some Anatoliy Prokopenko has coached the team he must be the different person. Although it might be wrong conclusion, but anyway we need some reliable proves that exactly he was a coach of the Qatar team.--Dƶoxar (talk) 08:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Ahatanhel Krymsky
Please note that there is a broad consensus that Kiev is used in the English Wikipedia, and not Kyiv. This consensus has been documented at Talk:Kiev and even has a dedicated page. Please do not change the spelling to non-consensus version. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, I see a consensus about the name of the article about Kyiv, not about the common use of the city name in the English Wikipedia. Could you give me a limk to this concrete consensus you wrote above? --Dƶoxar (talk) 20:05, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * My reading of the consensus is that the name of the city in English is Kiev, and that Kyiv is not English.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, this is your reading. But e.g. Oxford dictionary and a lot of other authoritative linguistic literature concerning English vocabulary states that Kyiv is an alternate version of Kiev, and it's OK to use it in standart English language. The article had been written with use of Kyiv version, later some anonimous user has changed it to Kiev. I consider this change as unreasonable, so I have moved it back. Where is a problem of this edit? There is no rule limiting use if Kyiv in English Wikipedia.--Dƶoxar (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, I ill take it to the WikiProject. Edit warring is nopt really good, given that you have a record of a copyright violation.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine--Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The next revert will take you to ANI. The Wikiproject Ukraine has chosen not to comment, so we are back to the consensus reading you are edit-warring against.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Interesting. I have written an article, you don't like something, you have started an Edit-War and now I am guilty of this? Really?--Dƶoxar (talk) 21:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:OWN?--Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, not. But as I am the author I am not the one who started the edit-war. --Dƶoxar (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You may be misunderstanding how WP:Edit warring works: please read WP:BRD. The fact that you initially wrote the article doesn't mean others are necessarily the ones edit warring first. LjL (talk) 01:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ANI topic
I opened a topic at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents about your inappropriate behavior.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring over name of Kiev
Your recent editing history at Ahatanhel Krymsky shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LjL (talk) 22:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Demir-Kapu moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Demir-Kapu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 13:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Qarpa


The article Qarpa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No assertion of notability, no sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Partial block from Ukraine
You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of one week for violating the 3 revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 11:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Article about Ukraine
Hi. I saw your discussion about the article Ukraine. In my opinion, the material presented in brief information about the country on the history of state formation is incomplete. If you look at the articles of neighboring countries, they indicate the history of their state formation since the Middle Ages. As far as I understood from the logic of those who supported the deletion of information, they were guided by the logic that only a list of historical states, which are called modern countries, is indicated. Example, the First Bulgarian Kingdom - Bulgaria; Duchy of Austria - Austria. But historically this is not correct and is a violation of historical truth, because here the goal is to point out the state-building origins of modern countries. Accordingly, in brief information about Ukraine should be mentioned Kievan Rus, Galicia-Volyn principality, Hetmanate. What can be done to correct this article? Severo Joy Krzyżaniwski (talk) 20:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Ukrainian toponyms that were changed as part of decommunization in 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaumyan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Ukrainian Nobel laureates for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Ukrainian Nobel laureates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Ukrainian Nobel laureates until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ymblanter (talk) 11:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Murafa (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Murafa (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, thanks. I provided link to the discussion, I provided sources. Am I a source of the edit war? --Dƶoxar (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Protect for 72 hours?--Dƶoxar (talk) 18:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
Please read the following and adjust your unblock request accordingly.Opponents? Wikipedia is not a WP:BATTLEGROUND. Attract attention? Please read WP:POINT. Just because you discuss does not grant you a license to edit war. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block.

Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Points to ponder:
 * Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.
 * Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.
 * Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.

To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what it all means. Thanks,. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)